Papers on "The Singaporean Paradox" and similar term paper topics

Paper #064586 :: The Singaporean Paradox
Buy and instantly download this paper now

This paper discusses the Singaporean paradox: The co-existence of Singapore as a model of Western culture and achievement with Draconian laws, which limit political opposition, freedom of speech and expression and even relatively innocuous acts.

Written in 2005; 2,910 words; 2 sources; MLA; $ 86.95

Paper Summary:

This paper explains that the Draconian laws of Singapore, which would hardly be tolerated in Europe and North America, have gone without much criticism from other democracies. Singapore still enjoys a reputation of being a successful example of democracy in a region that has suffered much political instability. The author points out that, although Singapore is a parliamentary republic, the People's Action Party (PAP) has had a politic monopoly ever since the United Kingdom granted Singapore its independence. Opposition parties do exist and contest elections, but the PAP holds 80 of 83 elected parliamentary seats (1 is vacant) and all the ministerial positions. The paper relates that the penal code permits caning, in addition to imprisonment, as punishment for some 30 offenses involving the use of violence or threat of violence against a person, such as rape and robbery and for such non-violent offenses as vandalism, drug trafficking and violation of immigration laws.

From the Paper:

"But do Singapore's ends justify the country's means? Although Singaporeans go to the polls once every five years and many people thus are under the impression that Singapore is a democracy, the country's leader are not at all shy about their hostility to Western-style liberal democracy. Following January 2000's general election, won by the ruling People's Action Party (PAP) in a landslide, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong said the result showed Singaporeans had "rejected Western-style liberal democracy and freedoms." Education Minister Teo Chee Hean has said that "a two party system would put us on the dangerous road to contention when we should play as one team", while Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew recently told Hong Kong people not to "waste time talking about democracy. There never was any democracy in Hong Kong in the first place."

Tags: rejection caning women glistening authoritarian-democracy

More papers on "The Singaporean Paradox"

1. Paper #054849 :: "The Ravens' Paradox" ( 2,685 words; 10 sources; MLA )
2. Paper #032031 :: The Paradoxes of American Nationalism ( 1,900 words; 1 source; )
3. Paper #060785 :: Zeno's Paradoxes ( 1,610 words; 4 sources; MLA )
4. Paper #074820 :: Kant's Paradox ( 1,400 words; 1 source; MLA )
5. Paper #009556 :: Paradox in "1984" ( 938 words; )

About AcaDemon

We have thousands of high-quality term papers, research papers, essays, book reports and dissertations on every topic. At AcaDemon, you can download those term papers to help you write yours! You can be sure that the term paper, essay, book report or research paper, you download are top-quality, competitively priced and high-level work.

Look for more research papers, essays and book reports on The Singaporean Paradox

This Free Term Paper Abstract is a part of our Term Paper Library. Here you can purchase research papers, examples of essays, academic dissertations, articles, notes, analytical papers, book reports, stories and poems. We have thousands of persuasive, point-of-view, narrative, critical, compare and contrast and other types of essays in our Library. You can also find here Term papers on "The Singaporean Paradox", Essays on "The Singaporean Paradox", Research papers on "The Singaporean Paradox", Student papers on "The Singaporean Paradox", Book reports on "The Singaporean Paradox", Dissertation on "The Singaporean Paradox", Thesis on "The Singaporean Paradox", Summary of paper on "The Singaporean Paradox", Articles written on "The Singaporean Paradox".