| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "OEDIPUS TYRANNUS": |
|
|
Oedipus Tyrannus, 2006.
This paper describes the drama of "Oedipus Tyrannus" as the finest of Sophocles' three plays.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes how "Oedipus Tyrannus" is based on the complex story involving Laius and his crime against Chrysippus, along with the birth of Oepidus as the son Laius was forbidden to have. Reference is made to the story throughout the play. The paper explains that the drama is a psychological mystery which is based on the limits of human understanding. According to Grene and Lattimore, the king defies all assaults upon his decision until the deadly self knowledge which starts to work in him has accomplished its course and he is convicted out of his own mouth.
| |
|
Sophocles' "Oedipus Tyrannus", 2008.
Reviews the play Sophocles' "Oedipus Tyrannus", especially the theme of fate and free will.
1,320 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Sophocles' play "Oedipus Tyrannus" asks the question whether Oedipus could have used free will to stop the fulfillment of the prophesy concerning his life and, if not, whether he deserved his self-imposed fate at the end of the play. The paper points out that one of the central flaws in Oedipus' character is his confidence, stubbornness and pride in himself, which led to his fate in the end. The paper concludes that Oedipus cannot be regarded as guilty but rather a victim of forces outside of his control.
Table of Content:
Character
Fate vs. Free Will
Oedipus' Guilt
From the Paper
"The audience is not presented with the impression that Oedipus' fate is the direct result of any flaw in his character. Indeed, the people of Thebes love and respect him. He also shows his integrity in dealing with those seeking his downfall. Creon for example seeks a private audience with Oedipus, but Oedipus refuses this in the interest of disclosure in matters regarding his people. He also shows himself to be a good king, in placing the interests of his people before his own."
| |
|
Kafka?s ?The Metamorphosis? and Sophocles? ?Oedipus Tyrannus", 2002.
This paper contends that both Franz Kafka?s short story, ?The Metamorphosis," and
Sophocles?s drama, ?Oedipus Tyrannus", focus on the protagonist as a classical Greek tragic hero, who is a victim of fate, and the absence of freewill.
1,600 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 0 sources, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses that, although both the protagonists, Sophocles?s Oedipus the King and Kafka's Gregor Samsa, are victims of fate and paternal jealousy, both men emerge as preeminent heroes in the world of literature. The author states that Gregor Sarnsa and Oedipus the King are both tragic heroes, victims of their father?s fate and of their own, who are not in control of their destinies. The paper demonstrates that both Oedipus the King and Gregor Samsa assume the roles of their fathers, which contribute to their downfall as heroes.
From the Paper
"Laius tried to kill his infant son by leaving him to die on the side of a mountain; similarly, Gregor?s father successfully kills his son by throwing apples at him. Because of the prophesy that his son was going to murder him, Laius acted in self-defense. Oedipus usurps his father?s power inadvertently, but he does rise to power and becomes a hero because he killed his father. Gregor rose to power and became the head of his family because his father was disabled. Like Laius, Gregor?s father felt that he acted out of self-defense when he killed his son."
| |
|
Wisdom from Suffering, 2006.
An analysis of the theme of wisdom from suffering in Sophocles' plays, "Oedipus Tyrannus", "Oedipus at Colonus", and "Antigone".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
While it is true that the concept of wisdom from suffering is basic to Aeschylean drama, it is also true that the very same concept has an important role to play in the Theban plays". This paper analyzes the theme of wisdom from suffering as it applies to "Oedipus Tyrannus", "Oedipus at Colonus", and "Antigone". The paper examines how the two plays, "Oedipus Tyrannus" and "Oedipus at Colonus" reveal a progression of wisdom for Oedipus. Oedipus is blinded as predicted by the prophet, but the full maturity of understanding finally comes in the second play. The paper also analyzes "Antigone", explaining that Creon learns wisdom through the death of his son, but not before it is too late.
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
An analysis of "Oedipus the King" as interpreted by Sophocles, Aristotle, and Sigmund Freud.
880 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how "Oedipus the King" ("Oedipus Tyrannus"), by Sophocles, which is set in the remoteness of ancient Greece and has come down to us in the form of a tragic myth, was allegedly inspired by true events and actual characters. It examines how the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, referred to this play continually in his "Poetics", pointing out features of the ideal tragic poem, and in the later years of the 19th century, Sigmund Freud adapted this myth as the basis for one of his most controversial psychoanalytic interpretations, namely, the "Oedipal Complex."
From the Paper
"In the case of Aristotle, Oedipus the King was interpreted not only as a powerful myth but also as a source of what defines true tragedy. For Aristotle, this connoted "an imitation of an action, not of narrative, that is serious and complete and through pity and fear, the proper purgation of these emotions is effected" (Martin 136). Thus, the central character of a tragedy like Oedipus the King must emote some sense of being virtuous despite having feelings of pity and fear for his eventual downfall which creates in the reader or the viewer a kind of outrage. Also, such a character cannot revel in evilness; he must be one "who is not outstanding in virtue nor full of righteousness but through a fatal flaw (hamartia) meets his end" (Woodard 178)."
| |
|
Oedipus and the Absurd Life, 2003.
An argument against the views of Robert Cohen's argument in "Oedipus and the Absurd Life".
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper disagrees with Robert Cohen's argument in "Oedipus and the Absurd Life" that Oedipus is a bullheaded, unschooled primitive and his persistence brings about his downfall. The primary source is Sophocles' "Oedipus Tyrannus."
From the Paper
"In Robert Cohen's Oedipus and the Absurd Life, Cohen's estimation of Oedipus in Oedipus Tyrannus is frequently harsh. As Cohen writes Oedipus is stubborn, bullheaded, frequently stupid, often rude and admittedly and unashamedly..."
| |
|
Oedipus, 2005.
An analysis of the character of Oedipus in Sophocles "Oedipus the King".
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how in Sophocles "Oedipus the King", Oedipus endures a dramatic transformation in character. It details the fall of Oedipus's character from a confident king to an ashamed person of exile. It also follows Oedipus's change in his self-perception and his change in identity.
From the Paper
"When Oedipus first addresses the city of Thebes, he confidently states, ?Here I am myself-- you all know me, the world knows my fame: I am Oedipus? (ll. 7-9.) This statement affirms his self-assured nature. At this point in the play, by claiming ?I am Oedipus,? he is emphasizing his self-knowledge, or at least what he believes to be this. He feels proud of his past accomplishments and believes that he has nothing to hide. He appears confident, open, and trustworthy; these characteristics have brought Oedipus respect and admiration within the community, and they have helped him to achieve such a prestige position as king."
| |
|
Sophocles's "Oedipus the King", 2005.
Character analysis of Oedipus in Sophocles's "Oedipus the King".
1,050 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes the plot of "Oedipus the King" and analyzes the main character of the tragedy, Oedipus. The paper looks at the effect that Oedipus's pride had on his life and whether it was ultimately the cause of the tragedies in his life.
From the Paper
"In Sophocles' tragedy Oedipus the King (Barnet et al. 986-1027), the title character Oedipus, cannot seem to catch a break in life. As the play opens, the kingdom he has married into and rules, Thebes, is ravaged by a terrible plague, and Oedipus despairs of being able to help his people. Later Oedipus receives the unwelcome knowledge from the blind prophet Tiresias that as a baby he was abandoned by his parents and left to die, since his father, Laius, had heard prophesy that his son would otherwise kill him (lines 508-26). When the baby Oedipus is handed over to a kindly shepherd, to do with him as he pleases, the infant's ankles have been bound so tightly that he develops swollen feet (the literal Greek meaning of the word "Oedipus"), and walks, forever after, with a limp."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
A literary review of the character of Oedipus in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper on the character of Oedipus in Sophocles "Oedipus the King".
| |
|
Oedipus and Othello, 2006.
An analysis of the character flaws that lead to calamitous falls of Othello and Oedipus in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and William Shakespeare's"Othello".
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Oedipus's and Othello's character flaws or weakness in the two plays, Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and William Shakespeare's"Othello". The paper describes the two plays as classic dramatic tragedies, in the sense that the audience experiences fear and pity as they witness the hero undergo a huge and disastrous change. It then suggests that in both plays one crucial reason for this calamitous fall is character flaws or weaknesses in the protagonists, Oedipus and Othello.
From the Paper
"Discuss Oedipus's and Othello's character flaws or weaknesses Sophocles' Oedipus the King and Shakespeare's Othello are two plays with much in common. Both are classic dramatic tragedies, in the sense that the audience experiences fear and pity as they witness the hero undergo a huge and disastrous change. Moreover, in both plays one crucial reason for this calamitous fall is character flaws or weaknesses in the protagonists, Oedipus and Othello. This paper will examine and compare the character flaws and weaknesses of these two protagonists. Both plays begin with their protagonist in a very good position."
| |
|
Oedipus Rex, 2007.
An analysis of the flaws of the character Oedipus Rex, in "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles.
1,116 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper introduces, discusses, and analyzes the play "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles. Specifically, it interprets the play and the main character, Oedipus Rex, and his inability to listen to those around him. The paper examines how Oedipus is a tragic hero with a fatal flaw. He does not listen to the advice of those around him, and this is his downfall by the end of the play. The paper concludes that he is a brave and good leader and ruler, but his flaw keeps him from being truly great, and causes the city of Thebes hardship and great misfortune.
From the Paper
"The lesson from Oedipus is that pride can get in the way of common sense and the good of the many. Oedipus is prideful, and will not listen to the voices of the people around him. Many different characters give him excellent advice, but he chooses to ignore it and follow his own path that eventually leads to doom. If Oedipus had just taken the time to listen to the words of older, wiser individuals, he might not have suffered the fate he did. He let his pride get in the way of common sense, and it led to tragedy for his family and his people. He lost his real mother and father, fathered two children in incest, and ended up blind and alone."
| |
|
"Oedipus Rex", 2003.
An analysis of the downfall of Oedipus in Sophocles' "Oedipus Rex".
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper outlines why the downfall of Oedipus in Sophocles' play "Oedipus Rex" is so tragic. It discusses whether or not he was accountable for his own downfall and what Sophocles was trying to say to the people of Athens.
From the Paper
"There is an old saying that says pride goes before a fall which means that when someone thinks and behaves in an over confident manner sooner or later something will happen usually brought upon themselves insome way to humiliate them. The more grand the ..."
| |
|
"Hamlet" and "Oedipus the King", 2005.
Character analysis of Prince Hamlet in "Hamlet" by William Shakespeare and Oedipus in ?Oedipus King? by Sophocles.
807 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, a character analysis of both Prince Hamlet and Oedipus is conducted, arguing that both characters have exhibited tragic flaws that ultimately determined their downfall in life.
From the Paper
"In Aristotle?s literary discourse, ?Poetics,? he discusses his theory of tragedy, wherein he introduces the concepts of tragic flaw or ?hamartia,? which serves as the catalyst for the protagonist?s downfall or the tragedy of the story to happen. He determines a tragedy as a ?drama? that brings about a ?sorrowful conclusion, arousing fear and pity in the audience? (Roberts and Jacobs, 1998:1189). Tragic stories are identified through three (3) characteristics or elements: first, the protagonist, usually a male, must be of noble stature; second, the protagonist or tragic hero must possess a tragic flaw or ?hamartia? that shall become his downfall at the end of the story; and third, the hero?s downfall must come with a self-realization on his part, making him a ?reformed? individual even if a tragic outcome happens to him."
| |
|
"Oedipus Rex" and "Death of a Salesman", 2004.
An analysis of fate, insanity, and the tragic lives of Oedipus in "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles and Willy Loman in "Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller.
846 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Considered as fine works of literature that demonstrate the tragic lives of humanity amidst its flaws and weaknesses, the plays "Oedipus Rex" by Sophocles and "Death of a Salesman" by Arthur Miller aptly reflect, through their protagonist characters, their belief in fate and resulting tragic lives that marked their downfall to insanity and, later, towards death. This paper discusses these three significant concepts: fate, insanity, and tragedy, which are relevant to the main point in both of these plays.
From the Paper
"Similarly, Willy Loman in Miller's famous contemporary play illustrates the modern American who depended heavily on fate-in American culture, it is synonymous with the concept of "American dream." Willy's beliefs that he and his sons, Biff and Happy, are destined to have a life of economic success, just because they have the 'proper social connections' and personality that will endear them to many people, and in fact, towards having a lucky and prosperous life. Willy's obsession to achieve the American dream by relying on pure charisma alone resulted also to his downfall: not only did he fail in his career as a salesman, but his sons also failed to realize their dreams in life, in the belief that their father's promise of an economically successful life will come true (Ardolino, 1998:2). Like Oedipus, Willy's belief in his fate as a successful salesman led to his indolence, which led to his family's increased fall towards poverty, causing him to commit suicide."
|
|
|
