| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "OEDIPUS KING VICTIM FATE MASTER": |
|
|
"Oedipus the King": Victim of Fate or Master of Destiny?, 2004.
An essay examining fate's role in the life of Oedipus in the play by Sophocles.
963 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the character of Oedipus the King in the play by ancient Greek playwright, Sophocles. It shows the culture of the audience of the time and discusses the overall plot of "Oedipus The King" to show that Oedipus was driven by forces other than himself, these forces being fate and destiny.
From the Paper
"So far he has been fate's toy, being tossed around in the sea of destiny and now he is washing ashore confused and yet never more enlightened. Slowly it unravels and he sees that the prophecy has come true, he has killed his own father and his wife is really his biological mother. This realization causes him to gouge out his eyes, causing him to truly go blind. For once he can see nothing, but the truth. He realizes this when he says ?What good were eyes to me? Nothing I could see could bring me joy.? These events have a rhythm, that cause the audience to suspect that destiny is at the helm of this ship."
| |
|
Fate in "Oedipus the King", 2002.
A discussion on the way Sophocles addressed the concept of fate in "Oedipus the King".
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper includes examples and source references supporting most fate oriented topics in the text. It shows how Sophocles shed great light on the role of the gods and how the society interacted with its religion and each other. Because the audience already knew the story of Oedipus and his doomed fate, it allowed Sophocles to create irony, and to demonstrate the futility of resisting the Fates.
From the Paper
"The Ancient Greeks, as with many societies always put great emphasis on the past and the future. Their religious ceremonies were to gain the favor of the gods, honor the past, and ask for a good future. The more extravagant the festival, the more honor to the god. The Greek people would want to carry the god?s favor for many reasons. The gods knew the future, the past, and the present and they embodied many important human characteristics such as jealousy, rage, and vengeance. The gods could protect them from famine, and just as easily expose them and their descendants to the worst things imaginable. No one quality exemplifies the power of the gods more than their control of one?s fate. They place a human on a linear line of life, and set them in the straightaway motion of living. This goes against a basic backbone of many other societies, the existence and practice of freewill. The Greek gods deprived its people of this and effectively made people the playthings of the gods. These powers vaulted the gods to a stature that could inspire fear, and also instill reverence for the ceremonies and festivals that were such a large part of Greek life and history."
| |
|
?Oedipus the King? and ?Death and the King?s Horseman?, 2002.
An analysis of two literary works, comparing the nature of parenthood as portrayed through the characters of the plays.
1,480 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship of parents and children in Sophocles "Oedipus the King" and Wole Soyinka?s "Death and the King?s Horseman". The writer describes how Sophocles allows Oedipus? theme of parentage full stage in the play, while in Soyinka?s work, Elesin?s son, Olunde, contributes to the plot throughout the play.
From the Paper
"Although written some two thousand years apart, both ?Oedipus the King? and ?Death and the King?s Horseman? deal with a father?s shame and ultimate fate as a social outcast. One is a king, the other a king?s horseman, yet both are equally men of honor and social standing, bound by customs, cultures, and spiritual beliefs in the afterlife. There are no true villains in either play. The characters are simply human, with human frailties and vanities, but appear good at heart with good intentions. The nature of parenthood is important in each author?s theme. Sophocles?s Oedipus and Wole Soyinka?s Elesin are both fathers who inadvertently cast shame not only unto themselves, but to their children as well. Moreover, both fathers are concerned with the fates and their own personal role in fulfilling their place in this life and the life beyond death. Sophocles?s play centers on Oedipus? parentage, discovering in the end that he has unwittingly killed his own father and committed incest with his mother."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2008.
A brief analysis of Sophocles' "Oedipus the King".
874 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles is about Oedipus, a man doomed by his fate. It looks at how, like most tragedies, "Oedipus the King" contains a tragic hero, a heroic figure unable to escape his own doom, and how the tragic flaw that Sophocles gives Oedipus is hubris (exaggerated pride or self-confidence), which causes Oedipus to walk right into the fate he sought to escape. The paper also discusses how Oedipus' pride pushes him toward his tragic end in the initial journey, when he kills his father, in the episode of the sphinx.
From the Paper
"On his trip away from Corinth, he unknowingly met with his father, King Laius. When Oedipus tells Jocasta of his encounter he says that he met with a carriage at an intersection and they fought over the right of way. He also mentions one man (King Laius) struck him and said that: "He [King Laius] was paid in full and ... my stick had struck him backwards from the car and he rolled out of it. And then I killed them all" (45, 1.801-13). Oedipus' pride caused him to kill his own father (unknowingly). He kept seeking for ways to avoid his destiny. This shows that he was so zealous that he thought he could avoid destiny. Also, in trying to avoid his destiny, he got into an argument over a small right of way incident. Had he just swallowed his pride and let the carriage have the right of way, he could have avoided everything. "
| |
|
Oedipus the King and Antigone, 2008.
An analysis of the underlying themes and character development in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King," "Antigone" and "Oedipus Colonus."
1,464 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the deeper inferences that Sophocles portrays through the vivid character history of the main characters in his "Three Theban Plays." It describes the characters and the development of the character Oedipus as the model for the tragic hero in "Oedipus the King," "Antigone" and "Oedipus Colonus." The paper concludes that the life of suffering is the underlying theme in the story of Oedipus and Antigone.
From the Paper
"It is also important to note that 'innocence' is not rewarded with an escape from any type of suffering. As in the case with Jocasta and Ismene, who play passive roles, both experience an element of suffering. While many view Jocasta as more a tragic character than Ismene, it is important to note that Ismene is governed by fear of man, rather than will of the gods; serving as the perfect foil to her older sister Antigone.
"Ultimately, the life of suffering is the underlying theme in the story of Oedipus and Antigone. In both plays, the hero's suffer extreme consequences for the choices laid upon them, regardless of their favor to the gods. In this sense, suffering is not only a consequence of choice, but also an inherent part of life. Sophocles portrays this theme perfectly through his tragic hero's and characters, laying the groundwork for many tragedians in the future."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
A literary review of the character of Oedipus in Sophocles' "Oedipus the King".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 4 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A paper on the character of Oedipus in Sophocles "Oedipus the King".
| |
|
Oedipus the King, 2008.
A discussion on "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles, where the central character is high-born, a king, and a man of power, but by the end of the play he has been destroyed.
1,299 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and looks at how the story is about the damage caused by pride, which was seen as a particularly egregious sin in the Greek view. The paper relates that Oedipus fails to take proper precautions even though he knows his fate from what the Oracle has foretold, but he does not exercise sufficient care to avoid that fate. The failure is because of his pride, because he sets himself above the gods and believes himself to be invulnerable.
From the Paper
"He then rules for years unaware of his crime. He has not forgotten his crime, for he does not realize he has committed it. From the point of view of the gods, though, he should have known this would happen and should not have killed anyone or married at all. At the same time, it is always clear that he had no choice because the prophecy was a statement of fate and could not be avoided, which really suggests that human memory of the prophecy is in some ways irrelevant."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
Analysis of the Greek Tragedy "Oedipus the King" with special focus on the meaning of the last line in the play.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"Oedipus the King" is a tragedy that focuses on the life and downfall of the unfortunate King Oedipus, who was condemned by the oracle at an early age to murder his father and marry his mother. This paper, analyzes, and pays special attention to the last line in the play, "Crave not mastery in all." And what this means in the context of the play and the ending of it all.
| |
|
"Oedipus the King" and "Death of a Salesman", 2003.
A comparative analysis of the tragic heroes from Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman."
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the tragic heroes from Sophocles' "Oedipus the King" and Arthur Miller's "Death of a Salesman." It looks at the characteristics and fates of tragic the heroes and the effect of their quests.
From the Paper
" The tragic heroes of Sophocles' Oedipus the King and Arthur Miller's Death of a Salesman, Oedipus and Willy Loman respectively refuse to passively accept their fate. In his essay Tragedy and the Common Man, Miller argued ..."
| |
|
Oedipus the King, 2002.
An examination of the feelings and emotions that run through the play "Oedipus the King" by Sophocles.
930 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"Oedipus the King" (Greek: "Oidipous Tyrannos") is a Greek tragedy written by Sophocles in the 5th Century BC. This paper examines the underlying theme of violence and inevitable tragedy brought about, in part, by the uncontrolled temper, arrogance and stubbornness of its central character, as well as the irony of fate. These aspects of the play are analyzed in this essay.
From the Paper
"The start of the play depicts its main character, Oedipus as a wise, happy, and beloved ruler of Thebes, though hot-tempered, and somewhat impatient, and arrogant. Oedipus flees Corinth because of a prophecy by a Delphic oracle that he would murder his father and wed his mother. While journeying to Thebes from Corinth, the young Oedipus angrily attacks and kills a small band of travelers who refuse to make way for him at a crossroads, a ?place where three roads meet.? (Therese). The scene depicts the terrible and self-destructive temper of Oedipus as well as the irony of fate with the tragic hero taking the road leading to ultimate tragedy. His fiery temper is further exhibited in the argument between Teiresias and himself, where Teiresias states the truth and Oedipus replies, ?Do you think you can say such things with impunity?? and later calls Teiresias a ?Shameless and brainless, sightless, senseless sot!? (Tragedy in Oedipus the King)."
| |
|
Irony in "Oedipus the King", 2002.
Examines how Sophocles wove irony into all elements of his tragic play "Oedipus the King".
1,100 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 1 source, £ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay addresses the numerous instances of irony in Sophocles' renowned Greek tragedy "Oedipus the King"; in the plot, the themes, and the dialogues. The author discusses how the audience knows of Oedipus' situation, long before he figures things out for himself, and examines one of the most ironic scenes between the king and the blind soothsayer, Teiresias.
From the Paper
"Oedipus the King is one of the best-known Greek tragedies in dramatic history. The central theme was instrumental to daily life of the early Greeks, because it demonstrates the powers of fate. The main plotline revolves around Oedipus and his quest to escape his own destiny, which turns his life to turmoil. The play is about murder, incest, and suicide. Knowing the play contains these exciting elements, one would think there would be no problem drawing an audience. When the play was produced, however, the Greek audience would have been familiar with the legend of Oedipus Rex. Sophocles faced a great challenge to develop a play that would generate interest in watching a play in which the patrons already knew the story. Sophocles captures and holds his audience?s attention by introducing profound irony in the dialogue, in the plot and in the setting of Oedipus the King. "
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
An analysis of "Oedipus the King" as interpreted by Sophocles, Aristotle, and Sigmund Freud.
880 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how "Oedipus the King" ("Oedipus Tyrannus"), by Sophocles, which is set in the remoteness of ancient Greece and has come down to us in the form of a tragic myth, was allegedly inspired by true events and actual characters. It examines how the Greek philosopher, Aristotle, referred to this play continually in his "Poetics", pointing out features of the ideal tragic poem, and in the later years of the 19th century, Sigmund Freud adapted this myth as the basis for one of his most controversial psychoanalytic interpretations, namely, the "Oedipal Complex."
From the Paper
"In the case of Aristotle, Oedipus the King was interpreted not only as a powerful myth but also as a source of what defines true tragedy. For Aristotle, this connoted "an imitation of an action, not of narrative, that is serious and complete and through pity and fear, the proper purgation of these emotions is effected" (Martin 136). Thus, the central character of a tragedy like Oedipus the King must emote some sense of being virtuous despite having feelings of pity and fear for his eventual downfall which creates in the reader or the viewer a kind of outrage. Also, such a character cannot revel in evilness; he must be one "who is not outstanding in virtue nor full of righteousness but through a fatal flaw (hamartia) meets his end" (Woodard 178)."
| |
|
"Oedipus the King", 2002.
This paper discusses Sophocles's "Oedipus the King".
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 1 source, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the character of Oedipus in Sophocles's "Oedipus the King" and an ineffective ruler.
| |
|
Character In Oedipus The King, 2002.
Analyzes "Oedipus The King" focusing on a very important character, Jocasta.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This sophomore level paper analyzes a Character In Oedipus The King focusing on a very important character, Jocasta, who plays the role of Oedipus's mother and wife in the play. This paper thoroughly analyzes her personality and her motives. This paper also compares the character of Jocasta with Oedipus and how both end up in a miserable situation in the end, from where there is no turning back. The paper also highlights few quotes from the play, which contribute to the development of important theme. In the end an analysis of Jocasta's complicated character is made.
|
|
|
