| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "O J SIMPSON TRIALS": |
|
|
The O.J. Simpson Trials, 2002.
A look at the O.J. Simpson trials and legal precedents set.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This ten-page undergraduate paper examines and analyzes the O. J. Simpson criminal and civil trials of 1995 and 1997 and discusses the interactive nature of the relationship between the media and the audience, and the social changes that resulted.
| |
|
The O.J. Simpson Trial, 2002.
A brief discussion of the O.J. Simpson trial for the murder of his wife.
733 words (approx. 2.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a brief insight of how the murder of the wife of ex-football-star-turned announcer caught the country's full attention in 1995. It examines some of the evidence leading to his arrest and provides some incriminating facts that the jury did not have access to during the trial and discusses how Simpson was eventually released. It evaluates how the schism between the races still exists and how televised criminal cases and media-hype can cripple the justice system in America.
From the Paper
"None of this evidence is circumstantial. It was incriminating evidence that pointed to a killer. By law, it was all hard evidence that would have resulted in the conviction of any one else by the justice system. However, the fact that O.J. was a celebrity and the fact that the trial was moved out of Santa Monica were contributing factors to a non-guilty decision.
Unfortunately, too many things went wrong in Simpson's favor and he got off Scott-free. If the LAPD had conducted a full interrogation, if Mark Fuhrman had not lied on the witness stand about his use of the "n" word and if Cochran hadn't played the "race" card so well, justice would have prevailed in this case."
| |
|
The O.J. Simpson Murder Trial, 1999.
Analyzes trial and pre-trial events, media, jury, evidence, police, the role of race, prosecution and the reason for the verdict.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 8 sources, £ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"This research paper examines how the evidence in this case was used by the jury to find the defendant, O. J. Simpson, not guilty. The predominantly black and female jury took less than four hours to arrive at its verdict. Such a speedy decision appeared to many to be strange behavior after a case which took nine months to try and involved 1015 pieces of evidence, 45,000 pages of transcript and scores of witnesses (Behind 27). This led many observers to conclude that the jury had ignored a 'mountain of evidence' against Simpson and had voted to acquit based on its emotional biases and external perceptions unrelated to the evidence. A more accurate interpretation would be that the jury made up its mind before it began its deliberations and found that a reasonable doubt existed as to Simpson's guilt, largely because..."
| |
|
The O.J. Simpson and Scott Petersen Trials, 2005.
A brief look at the similarities and differences in the two trials.
1,645 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the O.J. Simpson trial, where former football star, O.J. Simpson, was accused of murdering his wife and then found innocent of the charges, and the Scott Petersen trial, where Petersen was accused of murdering his wife and unborn child and subsequently found guilty of the charges. The paper analyzes the two trials, looks at why the verdicts of the two juries were different, and describes what the author of the paper believes to be weaknesses in the U.S. judicial system.
From the Paper
"The Scott Peterson trial has provoked as much debate around America as OJ Simpson's trial did a few years ago. The similarities between the two cases are remarkable. However, there are also important differences: OJ caught his wife with her lover, while Scott Peterson killed (or so it would seem) his pregnant wife to be with his mistress. They both committed a double murder, but the decisions of the two juries were opposite. This fact was caused by multiple factors."
| |
|
O.J. Simpson, 2002.
This paper discusses the O.J.Simpson trial.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the impact of the O.J. Simpson trial on law enforcement in the United Sates.
| |
|
O.J. Simpson, 2007.
This paper looks at the O.J. Simpson law case that intrigued America.
986 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer examines the O.J. Simpson case in which Simpson was put on trial for the murder of his ex-wife. The writer provides a summary of the case and then discusses that today, 11 years after the case ended, the debate over Simpson's innocence or guilt continues. The writer notes that Simpson, a college football star, has moved on with his life. However, his reputation haunts him. The writer comments that, throughout the trial and even now, people around the world have conflicting and strong opinions about whether or not Simpson is guilty. The writer points out that some say he looked guilty and displayed behavior that is commonly associated with abusive husbands and privileged celebrities, however, others truly believe that he is an innocent victim of a racist system. The writer concludes that regardless of whether Simpson is guilty or innocent, he is a free man.
Outline:
Introduction
Summary
Guilty or Not?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The prosecution seemed to have a strong case at first, as Simpson had a clear motive, an opportunity and no alibi. He had a history of physically abusing and harassing Nicole and had made violent threats against her. The prosecution proved that he had recently bought a knife similar in size and shape to what was believed to be the murder weapon. Finally, it was believed that Simpson dropped the bloody gloves, one at the crime scene and one at his home, and that he wore shoes the same size as those found at the crime scene."
"The defense case was not nearly as strong. There were no witnesses to the crime and no actual murder weapon could be found. However, the defense argued that Simpson was framed by police officers and found numerous flaws in the police evidence. They argued that Simpson was as a black victim of a white judicial system, on trial simply because he was a black man and the victim was a white woman."
| |
|
The O.J. Simpson Investigation, 2002.
Examines factors surrounding the mishandling of the O.J. Simpson investigation by the L.A.P.D.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In June 1994, football legend O.J. Simpson was charged with the double murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and her acquaintance, Ron Goldman. Despite vast amounts of evidence linking Simpson to the crime scene he was ultimately acquitted, at least in part, because of police negligence in handling the investigation. This paper traces the events surrounding the murders and subsequent investigation to show how the L.A.P.D. failed to provide key evidence and allowed doubts to arise over the credibility of physical evidence it had gathered.
| |
|
The O.J. Simpson Case and The Media, 1999.
Argues that print and TV journalists were sensationalistic and irresponsible in the coverage of murder, trial and aftermath.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Examines components of effective business writing, assessment criteria and the need for and techniques of teaching college students to write intelligently and effectively
From the Paper
Examines components of effective business writing, assessment criteria and the need for and techniques of teaching college students to write intelligently and effectivelyThe real winners were the television stations, book authors, and reporters who turned the case into a media gold mine. Perhaps the most lasting social effect of the trial was the revelation of racial differences in thinking in America.
The O.J. Simpson criminal case had all the ingredients that tabloid journalists crave. Simpson was, of course, a celebrity. In addition, he was attractive, as were the murder victims. Spicing up the case were the added, forbidden elements of race and sex: "America's dirty little secret--the obsession with race and sex that had haunted the nation since the days of slavery and ..."
| |
|
The OJ Simpson Trial, 2000.
An analysis of the problems and injustices of the verdict in the trial of OJ Simpson.
1,810 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 2 sources, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes Vincent Bugliosi's "Outrage", who recounts and attacks all the problems and mistakes he believes were made in the trial of OJ Simpson, and the reasons why Simpson was not convicted for the murder of his ex-wife and her boyfriend.
From the Paper
"Author Vincent Bugliosi states that O.J. Simpson?s acquittal is one of the most gross cases of injustice in the history of the legal system. He claims that O.J. walked not because he is innocent of the murders, but rather, that the circumstances surrounding the evidence, the weak and flawed case presented by the prosecution, the legal gaffs made my Judge Lance Ito, and that pertinent and damaging evidence was left out of the court proceedings all contributed to Simpson?s verdict of innocent. The result is that O.J. ?walked.? "
| |
|
OJ Simpson Trials, 1999.
Analyzes the different outcomes of Simpson's criminal & civil trials, focusing on the racial make-up of the juries.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"O. J. SIMPSON CRIMINAL TRIAL: EXPLAINING THE VERDICT
This research attempts to explain why O. J. Simpson?s criminal trial for the murder of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goodman ended in a verdict of ?not guilty,? while the civil trial, O. J. Simpson was found responsible for causing the wrongful death of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goodman. To the extent possible, this explanation is couched in concepts from social psychology. Within this context, it is hypothesized that variations in the outcomes of the criminal and civil trials involving the deaths of Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman was a function of the social psychological concept of social identity in relation to the jurors of the two trials.
Social identity is defined as the individual?s knowledge of personal membership in specific social groupings, together with the .."
| |
|
OJ Simpson Trial Evidence, 1999.
Critique's defense attorneys' claims that police mishandled, altered & created false evidence to frame Simpson.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 13 sources, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" The Simpson trial still reverberates in American society, more than two years after a jury acquitted the former football star. The loudest echoes surround the Los Angeles Police Department, which endured withering criticism before, during, and after the legal proceedings. Alas, casual observers would have to be excused for thinking that the LAPD was actually on trial. The defense served notice in opening statements, declaring the evidence ?contaminated, compromised, and ultimately compromised? (Los Angeles Times, January 31, 1995, A1). Their closing argument went even further, accusing the police of criminal misconduct in orchestrating a massive frame-up of Simpson (Los Angeles Times, September 29, 1995, A27). Was this the usual hyperbole of a criminal defense lawyer, or did the LAPD really deserve such condemnation? This paper will attempt to answer.."
| |
|
"Irrigating Crops With Seawater" ( E.P. Glenn, J.J. Brown and J.W. O'leary ), 1999.
Reviews this article on experimental study testing feasibility of such irrigation.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Glenn, Brown, and O'Leary (1998) conducted an experimental study to find and develop crops which could be irrigated by seawater. As the population of the earth increases, the production of food becomes more and more of a problem in order to feed this growing number of people. One of the specific problems facing agriculturalists is the need for water. Fresh water is needed not only for irrigation but also for other human activities, and there is no process that is effective enough at desalinization to provide the volume of water human beings need. The authors also note that the top five plants eaten by people cannot tolerate salt, and these are wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and soybeans. Since finding enough land and water to produce the foods needed by the world is an urgent problem, the authors ask how the supply of food can be augmented. They answer that one ..."
| |
|
OJ's Trial, 2002.
A look at the many issues surrounding the OJ Simpson murder trial - evidence, testimonies, verdict and public opinion.
1,758 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes and examines the multitude of issues related to the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. Part II discusses the evidence procedures that should have been followed in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial. In Part III, the evidence errors made in the O.J. Simpson criminal trial and their impact on the outcome are outlined. Lastly, this paper concludes with recommendations for improving the handling of vital evidence in criminal trials.
From the Paper
"Law is one of the most complex and powerful things in society. Unlike most things that have a minimal impact on most individuals, law impacts everyone?s life and provides set guidelines for proper behavior while punishing those who violate such guidelines. What makes law particularly unique is that cases have the ability to establish new precedent that may drastically alter societal norms (i.e., Roe v. Wade and its impact on womens? right to choose). The O.J. Simpson criminal trial was dubbed ?The Trial of the Century,? complete with a ?Dream Team? of lawyers for O.J. Simpson, an ex-Heisman trophy winner and B rate actor who was accused of murdering his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. Besides the notoriety of the accused murderer (news and television crews swamped the courtroom), this case was unusual both in its ultimate outcome (O.J. Simpson was found not guilty) as well as in the application of the law."
| |
|
"Public Opinion and the Supreme Court", 2002.
An analysis of the book "Public Opinion and the Supreme Court" by Marshall, in light of the O.J. Simpson trial.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A book report and analysis of Thomas R. Marshall's "Public Opinion and the Supreme Court". The book itself concerns the influence of public opinion, the media, and interest groups on the decisions handed down by the Court, and vice versa. The conclusion points out that the influence of the public has grown (or the Court's has diminished) in the wake of the OJ Simpson trial.
|
|
|
