| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "MUSIC COPYRIGHT": |
|
|
Music Copyright, 2004.
An analysis of the current issues concerning music copyright in Australia.
2,213 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 24 sources, MLA, £ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the current issues facing music artists in Australia. These include: DJs, copyright issues and intellectual property laws (file sharing, copying CDs ). The concerns of the current music industry are also addressed in response to these issues.
From the Paper
"Copyright protection in Australia, and 'any other country which is also a party to an international copyright treaty', (www.law.gov.au) begins the moment the work is completed. Australia is a member of a number of international treaties and conventions including: Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (Berne Convention), World Trade Organisation Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement), International Convention for the Protection of Performers, Producers of Phonograms and Broadcasting Organisations (Rome Convention); and Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of their Phonograms (Geneva Phonograms Convention). (www.law.gov.au)"
| |
|
Controversy of Napster and Internet Music Files, 2002.
This paper discusses the affect that globalization and the Internet has had on music copyright.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The current day of Globalization and advanced cyber-technology has tended to weaken all matters of patents, ownership and copyright. (Fitzgerald:2001) This is exemplified in different ways by the threat that Napster and shared internet music files represent to artists and to the music recording industry, at large. In this paper, the controversy created by the advent of Napster is explained in addition to possible prognoses for the future.
| |
|
The Music Industry and the Internet, 2003.
This paper discusses the early history of the battle by the music industry against the downloading of copyright music from the Internet and argues against the position of the industry.
2,115 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 12 sources, APA, £ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, despite the enthusiastic participation of some recording artists such as the Dave Matthews Band and Courtney Love, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has brutally attacked file sharing programs, such as Napster, which allow the downloading of music from the Internet, by arguing that the availability of music on the Internet is destroying record sales. The author points out that the industry's use of "fake files," which attempted to halt Internet music downloading, was an almost laughable endeavor, but intentionally damaging a consumer's computer was not so humorous. The paper relates that, in 1999, a law was passed, which declared that recorded music was the property of the company that recorded the music, not the artist; this outraged many artists.
From the Paper
"The Dave Matthews Band broke ground by releasing the first single from their 2001 album "Everyday" through the now defunct file-sharing program Napster. Napster, an Internet based file-sharing program, gave its users the ability to search for and download music (in MP3 format) to their computers by directly tapping into another user's computer. The program gained popularity rapidly, with millions of users at its peak in 2000 and 2001. When the Dave Matthews Band premiered "I Did It" through Napster, the album debuted at number one, and generated the highest first-week sales the band had experienced thus far."
| |
|
Music Piracy Battles, 2004.
Shows that illegal file-sharing and illegitimate duplicating of copyrighted music is the cause for record declines in global music sales and examines lawsuits against Napster and others.
2,132 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 13 sources, MLA, £ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Napster 1.0 , launched in 1999, allows Internet users to share, upload, and download MP3 files directly from any computer connected to the Napster network free of charge. This paper provides background on Napster and similar sites. This paper examines principals of the RIAA (Recoding Industry Association of America) in suing consumers who disregard the copyright laws, including its lawsuit against Napster. The paper also examines Napster's views and arguments on the lawsuit. The paper includes an outline.
From the Paper
"Contrary to recent reports through the RIAA, and despite a wave of lawsuits unleashed by the recording industry, college students appear to be downloading just as much music illegally as they did in past years. The Chronicle reports that they see little evidence that the industry?s efforts are presenting any significant impact other than profit making capabilities to new and upcoming legal networks. Music sharing, many experts say, continues almost unabated on college campus networks. The only way for music companies to compete near the same level is by making music easily accessible and cheaper to purchase."
| |
|
Online Music Distribution, 2007.
This paper explains that the rise of peer-to-peer (p2p) digital technologies has led to a fundamental transformation in how the audience of popular music regards music as property.
1,360 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that, while property rights in the music industry remain based upon rigid copyright laws, which give the copyright holder protection against any unlicensed copying or use of a music property, digital media has permitted widespread disregard for this law. The author points out that, even though there remains an opposing view by some people in the music industry that peer-to-peer (p2p) networks exchanging music amounts to theft of their property, a transformation in the understanding of property rights and music is underway on a global scale. The paper concludes that, as the phenomena of mashes and sampling indicate, artists and audiences have come to see digital music as a new medium for creative growth, which promises substantial changes in our popular music in the future.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Copyright Law and the Question of Ownership
Peer-to-Peer Technologies and Music Exchange
Audiences and Music Property
Conclusion
From the Paper
"It must be noted that even this limited copying capability was the result of fierce renegotiations between Apple and the leading recording industry companies who were unhappy about the one fixed price business model, as well as Apple's limited support for the audience's right to copy music. However, this right was based upon a key limitation on copyright known as "fair use" in the United States, and "fair dealing" in Canada. Under "fair use", for example, it is possible to not only use a copyrighted work without the copyright holder's approval but even to do so over the owner's express objection."
| |
|
Digital Distribution of Music: The Way of the Future, 2001.
This paper looks at the impact of the internet on businesses, specifically the music industry.
2,700 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 0 sources, £ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the impact of the internet on businesses, specifically the music industry, and the benefits of systems and technologies that can be implemented to counteract the negative effects of the web on one's business.
From the paper:
"That is why the record industry launched the Secure Digital Music Initiative. This was supported by both record companies and hardware manufacturers, in December 1998, with a promise to have agreed on technical specifications by June last year. SDMI participants include music content, consumer electronics, information technology, and wireless telecommunication companies. SDMI's work is based on the core principles that copyrights should be respected, but that those who wish to use unprotected formats should be able to do so. (Teller, 2000) The specification developed by SDMI will answer consumer demand for convenient accessibility to quality digital music, enable copyright protection for artists' work, and therefore enable technology and music companies to build successful businesses."
| |
|
Technology and Music, 2002.
A discussion on technology and innovation and their impact on the music industry.
710 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 10 sources, MLA, £ 17.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper considers the ways in which technology and innovation have challenged the music industry, with an economic perspective in mind, drawing on current articles and supports. In particular, it looks at the move from the LP to the CD and more recently, the innovation of MP3 technology which has forced the industry to make swift choices about marketing strategies. It evaluates the legal aspects of downloading free music from the internet and copyright violations through examples of lawsuits.
From the Paper
"Even though bootlegged copies of popular albums had been available for decades, the poor quality of these products limited this impact on the music industry. But the emergence of the MP3 changed not only the way that consumers accessed product, but also the way that artists and their labels contemplated their business. The quality of the product offered by MP3 technology rivaled the CD market, leaving little room for consumer discretion in this regard."
| |
|
Copyright Law, 2006.
An overview of copyright law and copyright infringement.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 6 sources, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a definition of copyright infringement, explaining that in the United States copyright infringement is the violation of the exclusive rights of a copyright owner. The paper also explains that violations of copyright may include literary works, musical works, dramatic works, pantomimes and choreographic works, artistic works, motion pictures and audiovisual works, sound recordings and architectural works as well as other created materials that are protected under copyright law. Additionally, the paper looks at how the definition of infringement, however, is subject to fair use conditions that are contained in the U.S. Code.
| |
|
Copyright Laws, 2005.
This in-depth paper examines and compares the issue of copyright and their applicability in terms of the law in the U.S., U.K. and China.
11,904 words (approx. 47.6 pages), 100 sources, MLA, £ 160.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This well-researched paper centers on the matter of copyrighted material in terms of literary works, musical compositions, dramatic works, pantomimes and choreographic works, pictorial and multi-media packages within CD-ROMs among others. This paper focuses on the legalities of copyright in the three countries cited primarily from the point of view held by archives. The writer of this paper begins by offering a detailed definition of both archives and copyright. According to this paper, a copyright is a set of laws and rules that are established as a particular form of government with the primary goal of protecting the original works of the author. This paper delves into various concepts of copyright including its being construed as a certain specification of law within a particular field of work. The writer examines the situation in the U.K. which currently houses nearly 2,000 archive repositories of various types in England. This paper analyzes the Title 17, U.S. Code copyright law which applies and can only be enforced in the U.S. The Title 17, U.S. Code is given to original works of authorship including literary, dramatic, musical and other forms of artistic works which give the owner of the work in question the permission to reproduce said work. This paper details the significance of China's copyright laws on America while delving into the vast differences between China's perception of archived and documented material to that of the western world. The writer examines the growing field of online archives and libraries. This in-depth and informative paper also contains pertinent data and statistics relevant to this specific topic. According to published figures there are 1.5 million visits a year to archives while up to 75% of those who visit do so for private or personal research.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Archives and the Copyright Provisions in the West
Archives and the Copyright Provisions in China
Discussion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"The term copyright has to be explained to some extent. Copying takes place in a number of instances and can be considered when a single copy is made of an article through photocopying, downloading pages from a Web site, or seeing a picture that has been loaded in the digital format. In all these instances, there is no violation of the rights of the copyright holder, as they may be considered to be a fair use of the facility. Since the question of copying is involved, there has to be an understanding as to whether there are violations of any rights of the copyright holder. The permissions have to be given when certain actions are involved like a movie version from a book, translation of a book into other languages, etc. In these cases, the rights of the copyright holder are involved, and it does not matter from where the person desirous of making the change got hold of the material. It depends on the copyright holder to say how the work for which they are holding copyright will be distributed to the public at large."
| |
|
Canadian Governments approach to Copyright, 2002.
This essay will look at copyright, in particular assessing how copyright pertains to the Internet today.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The first part of the assignment will explore what copyright is and why it is needed to protect people. The second part of the assignment will explore what laws the Canadian government institutes in order to hamper the dissemination of authors' ideas and information and come to assessment as to whether or not the government's actions are efficient and responsible.
| |
|
The Internet and the Music Industry, 2004.
This paper argues that music downloads and online radio have a positive effect on the music industry.
2,725 words (approx. 10.9 pages), 5 sources, APA, £ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that online radio, which simply rebroadcasts the content from existing, traditional radio stations or is solely virtual, has done the music industry much more good than harm because it is able to expose a greater diversity of people to artists and a greater diversity of artists to people. The author, using statistics, points out the correlation that the more you burn from the Internet, the more CDs you buy; therefore, the author seeks other causes for the lagging sales in the music industry, such as the recession, competition from other forms of entertainment, consolidation of radio stations, the ever-increasing CD prices, and even cellphones. The paper relates that the music industry?s legal campaign against downloading is being circumvented by new technology, such as ?Grouper?, which only allows users to ?stream? songs from a peer and, thus, operates legally under the ?private performance? section of the copyright law.
Table of Contents
Introduction
History of Online Radio
History of Music Downloads
Effects of Online Radio on the Music Industry
Effects of Music Downloads
Current Legal Status of Downloading
From the Paper
"As technology increased, so did the popularity of file sharing software like Napster. Although the use of such file-sharing software to download non-copyrighted material is not illegal, the propensity was for users to download copyrighted materials (?File Sharing?). For the last few years, the legalities of file sharing have made the issue one of the central debates. Record companies and musicians argue on both sides of the issue. Most, however, feel that unauthorized music downloads infringe on their livelihood and have negatively affected the profitability of the music industry as a whole. However, this may not be true."
| |
|
Downloading Free Music, 2005.
A look at how free music downloads online have dramatically impacted several industries, including CD and record retailers.
5,515 words (approx. 22.1 pages), 7 sources, APA, £ 93.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This report looks into data regarding downloading of free music on the Internet in the business setting of music distribution and music retailing. The report also looks at perspectives from the government and recording industry, as well as legal cases that have sprung up around this issue, focusing on principles of copyright law. The report presents both sides of the issue and pays attention to how the issue of downloading music for free over the Internet has affected internal and external business environments in terms of the ability to adapt to change, as well as the ability to control pricing.
Statement of Purpose
Setting of Problem
History of Problem
Scope of Project
Importance of Project
Definition of Terms
Review of Literature
From the Paper
"The problem originated in copyright law. There have been many technological innovations over time that have changed communication and distribution, and have also changed industries associated with communication and distribution. The music retailing industry as well as the recording industry should be familiar with change, since these
industries have gone through many different media over history: the vinyl record, the 8-track cassette, the audio cassette, and the compact disc are a few innovations that have kept the industry in a position to react to change as well as controlling change. This is mainly because in this history of technological development, music retailers and recorders have had the luxury of price control. There have been some bands over time who have tried to fight the establishment and sell their CDs without markup for between eight and ten dollars, but despite these few aberrations, the industry remained firmly in control of pricing throughout most of the twentieth century."
| |
|
Copyright Infringement in Electronic Publishing, 2000.
This paper explores the issues of copyright infringement in the Internet environment.
840 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines copyright infringement and its use with public domain, author's rights, and electronic publishing. It refers to downloading and uploading copyright material, how a copyright is developed and possible legal actions when a copyright has been stolen.
From the Paper
"In a recent Themestream Journalist Club email, a women wrote to complain about how her article on ?birthing experiences? had been illegally taken and copied onto another website. To make matters worse, she said, ?The infringer not only posted my work to his private website, he signed his own name to my article claiming it as his original work.? Copyright infringement has always existed, but as electronic publishing becomes progressively popular, the danger of Copyright infringement increases."
| |
|
Software and Copyright Laws, 2006.
This paper examines the various laws and regulations which were created to protect the owners of software copyrights.
878 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the legalities surrounding the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the Technology, Education and Copyright Harmonization Act (TEACH) which were both passed to protect the owners of software copyrights. This paper discusses the issue of software copyright as it pertains mainly to the field of education. The writer contends and explains the manner in which both laws clarify several complicated issues for software users while also offering international protection to owners of copyrighted material. This paper examines the basic premise of TEACH which contains recommendations made by the U.S. Copyright Office that addresses the use of informational material and services obtained via the internet. This paper discusses the responsibilities of online educational organizations who make use of informational software. This paper also delves into the additional concerns and responsibilities facing school libraries regarding the software used on library computers.
From the Paper
"These requirements are in addition to laws and regulations previously on place. The laws are intended to give software publishers the same protections text publishers have. Just as it is illegal to photocopy textbooks to avoid buying published copies, schools cannot copy software for use on multiple computers unless they have purchased a multiple-use license. Then, they must restrict the number of copies to the number authorized in their purchase. They may not install personal copies of software they purchased for home use on a school computer; or make copies of school-owned software for either home use or to share with parents and students. In addition, the laws address the use of shareware. Sometimes people think of shareware as "free," but it is not, and schools may not use shareware beyond the date at which the shareware copyright owner demands payment. In addition, although freeware is free in that the school does not have to pay for it, the law states that people may not sell freeware."
|
|
|
