| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "MORALITY LITERATURE": |
|
|
Social Morality in Modern Literature, 2004.
An analysis of the concept of social morality in modern literature.
811 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses four literary works in an attempt to define social morality: Chinua Achebe?s novel, "Things Fall Apart", W. B. Yeats?s "The Second Coming", "The Guest" by Albert Camus, and T. S. Eliot's "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock". The paper examines how, through literature, writers are able to provide people with varying themes related to the discussion of social morality, offering people avenues wherein morality can be created and developed by society and adapted by the individual.
From the Paper
"Literature, as the primary source of information of people in witnessing and experiencing realities interpreted by the author/writer, is more than a medium that extends messages of reality and experience. Literature is, first and foremost, an expression of thoughts and ideologies that may or may not be agreed upon by the author or his/her characters in the said work. The concept of social morality is such example of these ideologies extended thru literary works. Through literature, writers are able to provide people with varying themes related to the discussion of social morality, offering people avenues wherein morality can be created and developed by the society, and adapted by the individual."
| |
|
Changing Moral Values in Vietnam Literature, 2000.
An examination of the shattering of American moral values in Vietnam War literature.
2,175 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 3 sources, £ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
A discussion of the effects of the Vietnam War on ideals of morality, rationality and logic. Examines how America had to completely rethink its ideals; explaining that the Americans saw a side of themselves that had previously thought extinguished by moral superiority. Several explorations of this phenomenon can be found in the literature that grew out of the Vietnam conflict. The paper provides a discussion of how the Vietnam War influenced and changes ideals of morality.
From the Paper
"Kant here argues for the existence of a supreme moral law which exists as the sole extension of reason; he contends that the only purpose of reason is to define and create moral ethics, and thus the conclusion that any action is ?moral? must be reached solely through reason itself. This idea, that reason dictates morals, has been one of the most influential philosophical ideas in western thought. It influenced strongly the great political theorists, including Locke and Voltaire, and was hailed as the New Ethics for the Enlightenment. Indirectly, it can even be said to have influenced strongly the two great revolutions (French and American), both of which resulted in nations which held that reason was the highest goal of humanity, and that morality could be defined by rational means."
| |
|
Moral Standards and Moral Consistency, 2008.
This paper explores the moral standards in the associations of Eberhard Faber, Incorporated.
1,049 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper examines the decision to allow Eberhard Faber to associate with known bribe-givers. The paper is of the opinion that this association seems like an affront to the moral consistency requirement demanded of any credible moral standard. The paper contends that respecting the law in some, but not in all, circumstances makes a mockery of the organization's avowed commitment to legal dictates and therefore is inherently immoral.
From the Paper
"Before going too far, the stakeholders in this situation need to be listed. Obviously, the share-holders of Eberhard Faber are one significant stake-holder; so too is the Board of Directors and, especially, the key principals (Mr. Faber and Mr. Carey) who offer widely divergent views on how to approach this matter. Not to be forgotten, the other company involved is a stake-holder as it could lose a major deal with an American company - a deal it would seem to covet. Lastly, IRS and legal consultants who convinced Mr. Faber that the deal was above-board and breached no US laws are stake-holders with credibility on the line (for a lengthier discussion on all of these parties, please see "Eberhard Faber, Inc.," n.d.). In the end, many people stand to win - or lose."
| |
|
Nietzsche, Morality, and the French Revolution, 2000.
This paper is a reconstruction of Nietzsche's moral theory in "On the Genealogy of Morals" and its application to the moral-political philosophies of the Old Regime and the French Revolution.
1,775 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an examination of Nietzsche's "On the Genealogy of Morals" and its relation to the historical context in which it was written. A parallel is drawn between Nietzsche's view of the historical evolution of morality and the development of the moral-political philosophies of the Ancient (Old) Regime and the French Revolution. The Ancient Regime is associated with Nietzsche's idea of "good, bad" morality, while the French Revolution is connected with "good, evil" morality. Some other issues discussed are the idea of the slave revolt and the morality of Napoleon.
From the Paper
"Every civilized society is concerned with its moral fabric: the ethical and behavioral norms that all citizens are expected to obey. Morality, on its surface, appears to be a philosophical issue. Some people speak of a universal morality, beyond time and devolving upon all people equally. In this way, they explain the prevalence of certain moral laws, for instance, the prohibition against murder, in almost every society. Others view morality as a subjective concept, yet still one with philosophical origins. They maintain that many societies possess laws against murder because each group of people has made an independent philosophical evaluation, and determined that the value of life is something they as cohabitants of the same state all uphold. For Friedrich Nietzsche, both of these approaches are fundamentally flawed."
| |
|
Southern Literature, 2004.
Analyzes the roots of Southern literature and how the authors view moral freedom in their works.
1,295 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The pervasive and massiveness of the diversified American culture at the time of the settlement of the colonies posed a mixture of excitement and danger as settlers struggled to strongly cling to their heritage. One observes these traces in the culture of the Southern population, especially during the 19th and 20th centuries, through the writings of authors like Mark Twain, Cormac McCarthy, and William Faulkner. The paper shows that, in their works, the authors recounted the initial settlements and how they have changed over time in their attempt to adapt to their new habitat, but perhaps the most prominent feature of their writings was the portrayal of the struggle for moral freedom and the emotional dilemma the settlers experienced in achieving their ideology. This paper, therefore, shows that Southern authors demonstrate the divergence of moral freedom as a common theme in the works of Twain, McCarthy, and Faulkner.
From the Paper
"Twain's famous work Huckleberry Finn demonstrates the cultural diversification of the people of the American continent. His unconventional approach in showing that religion that once had a high distinction among colonialists was no longer valued. Stan Poole's essay "Pretty Ornery Preaching", for example, outlines how Twain attempted to enlighten the way the anti-slavery movement operated in the South. And as a result of this social paranoia and social pressure, Twain felt the need to portray a rebel at heart in the form of the character of Finn. Finn abandoned conventions because he realized that in order to survive he must set new codes of conduct that has more to do with survival rather than religious apathy."
| |
|
"Morality in Practice", 2002.
An analysis of morality for the lower class struggle in "Morality in Practice" by James Sterba.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will seek to understand how James Sterba in his book "Morality in Practice", seeks to understand the justification for morality to the poor. By understanding the arguments he presents, we can see a valid formation of morality for the lower class struggle.
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche on Morality, 2002.
A look at the different manifestations of morality in the writings of Freud and Nietzsche.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an examination of the perspective of moral qualities in the works of Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche. Morality is compared in two formats: These formats are those of the individual morality, or how morality applies to a single person, and the social morality, or how morality works within a social context.
| |
|
Benefits of a Teleological Theory of Morality, 2004.
Compares teleology, deontology, and the virtue-based systems of morality, making an argument for the teleological system of morality.
1,142 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay brings out the positive and negative points in the three major systems of morality: teleology, deontology, and the Aristotle's virtue-based systems of morality. It then explains why Mill's theory of Utilitarianism (teleology) would be better in today's society.
From the Paper
"The majority of the population, probably including yourself, claims they act "morally". Many of these people ask other people to act "morally", but when you ask these "moral" people what morality is they stand there for a minute, and almost every single person will give you the wrong answer. So what is morality? In brief, morality is a basic set of principles that people follow. A perfect example would be Osama Bin Laden, a man that believes completely in what he does, and does it to his best. He has his own set of "morals" which he follows perfectly. He is acting morally. On the other hand we have Saddam Hussein; he does not follow any set of standards consistently, and therefore is not considered "moral". Obviously someone who acts morally may be acting morally according to their set of standards, but in our opinion are very wrong. This is because we have different systems of morality. There are three major systems of morality: Immanuel Kant's theory of Deontology, Aristotle's theory on Virtues, and finally the theory of Utility, or the Utilitarian principles of Teleology."
| |
|
Morality, 2002.
An examination of two different models of human morality as debated in the ancient world: The moral nihilism of Thrasymachus and the moral realism of Plato.
1,240 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper attempts to answer the question of what it means to be moral and shows that defining the limits of human morality is a complex and ambiguous task. It discusses in detail two different models by two different philosophers -Thrasymachus and Plato. After considering the strengths and weaknesses of each model, including the personal consequences of adopting one, the paper concludes by selecting one of the models as being (personally) preferable, even if it is not as true.
From the Paper
"Socrates ? like modern-day adherents of most of the world?s major religions, including Judaism, Christianity and Islam ? would argue that it is better to be just for its own sake, or at least because the gods or God reward those who are good. (Socrates in fact argues that it is better to be moral even if acting in a right and moral way causes one to gain a bad reputation ? as does sometimes happen ? for it is always better to adhere to the path of truth than to be concerned about popularity or reputation, which are transient.) Another response would be to assert a claim of moral nihilism, which is the proposition that in fact there are no true ethical principles (viz. Morgan 21-23)."
| |
|
Vietnam War Literature, 2007.
This paper discuses references to American religious culture in Vietnam War literature using examples from Tim O'Brien, Norman Mailer and Robert Bly.
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Vietnam War literature positions American religion as being a God-fearing culture that seeks to be moral. The author points out works by Tim O'Brien, Norman Mailer and Robert Bly that refer to this everyday American religion and culture and to myths of American power, politicians and industrialists as being insane and immoral and as changing forever how Americans saw their country. The paper relates that these works project the Vietnam conflict as something in which Americans should never have been involved including describing its soldiers as victims or as people responsible for terrible crimes of war. The author stresses that Vietnam was a working-class war rejected by the American bourgeoisie, who did not need to go to combat. The paper concludes that the literature discussed in the paper is the work of Americans with the option not to go to Vietnam and that it needs to be examined along with other literature produced in the next decades, too.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Damning Literature
Tim O'Brien's "In the Field"
Norman Mailer
Robert Bly Poem: "The Teeth Mother Naked at Last"
Last Remarks
From the Paper
"Norman Mailer's "The Army of the Night" was published in 1968 and is an allegorical description of the March on the Pentagon. The reader is shown the extreme contrast between rather decadent hippies of the anti-Vietnam War movement and the thousands who then fought in Vietnam, ordinary Americans who dealt with every terrible aspect of jungle warfare. The last pages of "A Confrontation by the River" tell of a clash of American popular myths and moral beliefs about America and a "true religious war of Christ against the Communist" in relation to Vietnam towards a "whole crisis of Christianity in America... ""
| |
|
French-Canadian Literature, 2004.
This paper discusses the history of French Canadian (Quebec) literature.
1,825 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that much French-Canadian literature, especially the more early forms, had geographic themes; even when many of the writers began moving into the cities, they used their new environment as a foundation for their works. The author points out, that Albert Laberge wrote about rural life, but in a negative fashion, contrary to most literary artists of his time; where previous rural novels included idyllic characters and surroundings in an environment of socio-moral ascension, Laberge saw humans as snared in a world of misery and mediocrity, leading to moral and social decay. This paper relates that, in the last few decades, French-Canadian literature has become globalized with the inclusion of ethnic writers immigrating from Italy, Haiti, and China.
From the Paper
"Patrice Lacombe wrote Paternal Ground in 1846, the very first "novel of the ground,? as it later was called. This theme of the strong relationship with the land dominated French Canadian literature for nearly a century. Lacombe?s work relates the despondency of a rural family following their youngest son?s decision to leave home to travel abroad. The older son tries to keep the farm going, but loses it through bad business decisions. The father tries to work in the city, but is desolate. Fortunately, the young son returns with enough money to buy new land, and the family is safe once again."
| |
|
"Principles of Christian Morality", 2005.
This paper discusses "Principles of Christian Morality" by three preeminent Catholic scholars Heinz Schurmann, Joseph Ratzinger and Hans Urs von Balthasar, who examine interpretations of moral theology.
1,235 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 0 sources, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Heinz Schurmann's contribution, which was written as a submission for the 1974 International Theological Commission session discusses the New Testament's influence on morality, via both its statements and interpretations. The author points out that Joseph Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) discusses the distinction between practice (orthopraxis) and established beliefs (orthodoxy) and the need of having a fixed point of moral reference. The paper relates that Hans Urs von Balthasar sets forth nine precepts of Christian morality in summary form, exploring Christ as the universal, concrete norm for Christian morality, with the golden rule as a summation of God's law and Christ on the cross as the only salvation from sin.
From the Paper
"Ratzinger, in an effort to establish a practice for Catholics in a modern context, explored the possibility of the shifting meaning of religious law and commandments (50). The opposite of praxis, Ratzinger states, is the belief "that affirms that there is no such thing as a specifically Christian morality and that Christianity must take its norms of conduct from the anthropological insights of its time" (49). Ratzinger concludes that praxis is indistinguishable from a genuinely believed truth in Christ-that to imitate Jesus Christ is "inseparable from faith" and that "faith's praxis depends on faith's truth" (62, 70). In other words, if one genuinely holds a belief in Christ, that faith will influence one's practices and in turn, will relate the truth with the praxis."
| |
|
Is it Possible to Separate Law and Morality?, 2002.
This essay illustrates that the separation of law and morality is both possible and impossible, depending on how one defines the phrase ?separation of law and morality?.
2,390 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 38 sources, MLA, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The essay explores the legal positivist separation thesis. It approaches the question of whether it is possible to separate law and morality from two aspects- first, the content of the law and secondly, the judicial decision maing process. The writer makes reference to the policy of removing part-Aboriginal children from their families and communities, and placing them in special purpose institutions to support his argument.
From the Paper
"It has been described as ;arguably the most tragic and shameful chapter in Australia";s history.; From the late nineteenth century to the late 1960's, Australian governments carried out the policy of removing part-Aboriginal children from their families and communities, placing them in special purpose institutions. Often, these removals were carried out by force. The purpose of this removal policy was to assimilate the part-Aboriginals with the white community as the full-blooded Aboriginals were believed to be a doomed race in the sense that they would die out. A large number of the children suffered physical and emotional mistreatment following the removal from their families. The children who were removed under this policy came to be known as ";the stolen generation" This sets the backdrop against which I will discuss whether it is possible to separate law and morality with respect to the Australian court"s law making power.4 The separation of law and morality is the foundation of legal positivism. Positivists often criticize natural law theorists for blurring the line between law and morals. This essay aims, by examining three stolen generation cases, to illustrate that the separation of law and morality is both possible and impossible, depending on how one defines the phrase ";separation of law and morality."
| |
|
Inner and Outer Morality, 2007.
This paper discusses inner and outer morality in Plato's 'Republic'.
1,155 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer explains that, according to Socrates in Plato's Republic, morality is one of the four elements of goodness in a community. The writer notes that inner morality was the rule of reason over other parts of the mind whereby a person lets reason and rationality rule. The writer points out that Socrates argues that when there is harmony between all elements of a community, morality will emerge. The writer explains that this is outer morality. The writer concludes that for morality to exist, it is important that every single part of the community and mind must be allowed to function properly within its own limits. The writer maintains that this would create harmony and peace and these two are the essential components of inner and outer morality.
From the Paper
"The third part is self-discipline. Socrates explained that it is not easy to allow oneself to be ruled. But when every section of a community accepts its rulers and understands that some people rule while others are the ruled, they are exhibiting self-discipline. This is needed for a community to function smoothly. When all these elements are found, we realize that the ability to a community to allow every person to do his job without creating conflict is morality. This is the outer morality that helps keep a community intact."
|
|
|
