| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "MICHAEL COLLINS TERRORISM": |
|
|
Michael Collins and Terrorism, 2007.
This paper discusses the subject of terrorism focusing on Michael Collins.
1,357 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this essay, the writer maintains that the legend and reality of the life of Michael Collins is matter of much debate and also a certain amount of mystery. The writer notes that the subject of Collins' motivations and character are dealt with in the film "Michael Collins" directed by Neil Jordan. The writer points out that there is a certain amount of ambiguity with which the film attempts to deal, in that Collins is the instigator of a brutal form of guerrilla warfare used as a reaction against the occupying British forces. The central aim of these actions was to oust the British from Ireland and to achieve an independent Irish Republic. There are two central aspects that this paper attempts to address in light of the view that the film puts forward about Collins. Firstly, the writer notes the view of Collins as an Irish patriot and secondly the writer assesses Collins' methods of retaliation against the British forces in Ireland.
From the Paper
"The film itself leaves little doubt that the tactics that Collins employed against the British, while ethically questionable, were the only tactics that he felt were left to him in the face of the overwhelming force of British domination. At one point in the films he states that he hates the British not because of their nationality, colonial dominance or even their brutality, but because they have left him no choice but to employ harsh tactics that would increase violence and hatred. This reasoning is similar to the rationale behind many other guerilla or terrorist groups and tactics throughout the world. There is also suggestion in the film and the literature that the way that Collins used guerrilla tactics against the British was emulated by other leaders and groups such as Argentinean Marxist revolutionary, Che Guevara."
"This reason for the use of guerilla or terrorist tactics is often given as being inevitable, when a smaller force is faced by an intimidating and overwhelming or numerically superior oppressor that cannot be fought in a conventional manner."
| |
|
Michael Collins, 2007.
This paper discusses the guerilla tactics used by Michael Collins in Ireland.
713 words (approx. 2.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 17.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper shows how, like most controversial political figures, Collins was both admired and despised. The paper explains that loyal supporters of Collins saw him as a fighter for Irish freedom and independence, while the British and some in Ireland saw him as a violent radical. The paper discusses the film "Michael Collins" by Neil Jordan that illustrates Collin's tactics of guerrilla warfare and shows how violence inevitably has tragic consequences.
From the Paper
"Like most controversial political figures, Michael Collins was both admired and despised. The adage that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter definitely applies to Collins, for he was idolized across much of Ireland as a patriot, but was condemned by the British as a villain. Loyal supporters of Collins saw him as a fighter for Irish freedom and independence, while the British and some in Ireland saw him as a violent radical."
"In his film "Michael Collins" Director Neil Jordan (1996) portrays the violent final hours of the Easter Rising, during which British troops suppressed the rebellion and executed the Irish leaders by firing squad. Jordan's portrayal of the guerilla tactics of Michael Collins reveals why the British considered him a terrorist, for he targeted the British leadership in Ireland for assassination in order to create chaos and compel the British to grant the Irish independence."
| |
|
Michael Collins, 2006.
Reaction paper about Michael Collins and his influence on later revolutionaries.
690 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This reaction paper is about Michael Collins, the leader of the Irish Republican Brotherhood, his tactics, model, and his influence on later revolutionaries/terrorists. It looks at Collins' model of political violence.
From the Paper
"Terrorism Having viewed the film Michael Collins and examined a limited sample of scholarly literature on the life of the Irish radical activist himself the purpose of this report is to discuss who and what Michael Collins was ..."
| |
|
Michael Collins, 2002.
A biography of the Irish revolutionary leader, Michael Collins.
1,461 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the life of Michael Collins, who, through his courageous involvement in the Irish revolution for independence, as well as his political activity, can be considered one of the greatest Irish heroes of all time. It examines how he was both a visionary and a realist, seeing not only that there was room for change in Ireland, but also that compromise can equal justice. It shows how he was well-respected by the people of Ireland, not only for his bravery and courage, but also for his ability to lead others with confidence and a clear sense of equality. He was a revolutionary leader who, through determination and will, led his country to independence from Britain.
From the Paper
"He returned home to Ireland in December 1916. In 1917, he was elected to the Sinn Fein (Barrett, 1997). The Sinn Fein was, and still is, an establishment which attempts to form a new Ireland based on sustainable social and economic development; genuine democracy, participation, and equality and justice. Collins was elected Member of Parliament as a Sinn Fern candidate in the British General election held in 1918. The party formed a separate Government in Dublin known as Dail Eireann (Loftus, 2003). The British were quick to react and the new government was barred and forced to go underground (Bowden, 1973)."
| |
|
"Michael Collins": A Book and a Movie, 2002.
A comparative analysis of the book and film version of "Michael Collins".
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at both the movie and book of "Michael Collins", a comparison and contrast of the two are addressed. As well the credibility of both are addressed.
| |
|
Michael Collins, 2002.
This is a historical film review of the movie made about the Irish revolutionary's life.
1,155 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 7 sources, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a historical film review that analyzes "Michael Collins" starring Liam Neeson and discusses the movie's historical accuracy. The author includes specific details of the Irish patriot?s life, his major role in politics, his military strength, and the attacks he carried out as a member of Sinn Fein.
From the Paper
"The movie Michael Collins is the story of an Irish revolutionary and political leader. He was a leader within the Irish Republican Brotherhood, a leader in the Sinn Fein Movement and a member of its cabinet, a guerrilla leader, and eventually became the Commander in Chief of the Irish Free State Army. The film details the events of his political career, his love life, and ultimately, his death. Collins? goal of course was to take Ireland back from the British after 700 years to form an independent republic for the Irish people."
| |
|
Historical Inaccuracies of "Michael Collins", 2002.
An analysis of this film from an historical reference point of view.
5,800 words (approx. 23.2 pages), 22 sources, APA, £ 98.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
"Michael Collins" is an engaging film that looks at the early 20th century Irish patriot. This paper looks at the historical accuracy of the film by comparing and contrasting the events and people in the film with the actual events. It looks at the characters, the events, the political agenda and the implications made throughout the film.
From the Paper
"One of the most dynamic figures in 20th century Ireland was Michael Collins. For centuries heroic leaders tried to free Ireland from Great Britain. Their rebellions plans were spectacular in idea and more spectacular in their failure. While previous revolutionaries were bold yet unrealistic, Collins was able to take on the British and drive them out of Ireland. He was a dynamic leader with a complex personality. While he helped orchestrate a guerilla campaign against the British authorities, Collins hated violence. Collins could be ruthless and compassionate at the same time. He was always ready with a quick joke. This made his personality even tougher to capture. Even with these complexities, Neill Jordan?s political goals force him to take too many liberties in depicting key people and events Collins?s life."
| |
|
Terrorism and Counter Terrorism, 2004.
A study of the development of international terrorism and counter terrorism, both in general and specifically, since the events of September 11th, 2001.
1,754 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 11 sources, APA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper focuses on the way counter terrorism and terrorism have changed since 9/11 and the growing role of the U.S. It also looks at the development of 'modern' terrorism and the possible consequences of the continuing War on Terror. It debates whetherr or not September 11th, 2001 can be seen as a day that changed the face of terrorism. It also discusses how since the invasion of Afghanistan, terrorist attacks have become more numerous and high profile although their basic purpose remains the same, to gain attention. It puts forward the view that what has changed about terrorism since 9/11 is the amount of media attention it now controls.
From the Paper
"As well as presenting a recent point of reference for terrorist activity, the conflicts in Palestine and Northern Ireland also show two different ways of dealing with the problem, certain aspects of which have been adopted by the United States. In the case of Britain and Northern Ireland, the conflict is one of territory and security for those who want British rule. In Palestine and Israel however, the situation is based purely on territory. This difference in the foundation for the terrorist action seems to have dictated the way in which terrorism has been dealt with. Because of the presence of British citizens in Northern Ireland, and the small section of society that is involved in the unrest , it has been British policy in recent years to try and settle the situation through political sanctions and increased security measures to prevent terrorism."
| |
|
Michael Taussig: Culture Of Terror, 2002.
This paper answers some important questions in connection with Michael Taussig?s essay, "Culture of Terror-Space of Death: Roger Casement's Report?.
610 words (approx. 2.4 pages), 0 sources, £ 15.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper critically reviews Michael Taussig?s essay on the culture and society in which terror reigns supreme. It isolates Taussig?s most important point ? that no matter how much we try to understand the psychology of terror or victimization, we can never satisfactorily reach its core because we have never really experienced it personally. It discusses exposure to extreme terror, that forces people to escape reality and explores Taussig?s concept of ?the space of death?. The significance of this ?space of death? is assessed, applied to victims of colonization and the writer gives his/her personal opinion on this coping mechanism. Taussig?s work is compared to that of Eric Wolf, who wrote ?Europe and the People without History?, about life in the colonies during imperial rule; and the authors? differing approaches are highlighted.
From the Paper
"Michael Taussig has conducted a very powerful analysis of the culture and society in which terror reigns supreme. He has focused on the world of victims and victimizers to explain how and why their thinking differs from those who fortunately do not fall in either of the two categories. The strongest point made by Michael Taussig is that no matter how much we try to understand the psychology of terror or victimization, we can never satisfactorily reach its core because we have never really experienced it with our own eyes or flesh. This means that since the stories of terror usually reach us through word of others, we are simply unable to understand why someone would go to such extreme lengths to destroy other human beings. He is of the view that Indians or Africans and all those who suffered under the Imperial rule did not exist in the same world as we do today."
| |
|
"Terror" in the Mind of God: A Study of Terrorism, 2005.
This paper studies the dangerous influence that religion has on some believers-- an influence that ignites terrorism.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Using Mark Juergensmeyer's book "Terror in the Mind of God" as a reference, this paper examines how religion sometimes influences its believers in such an extreme way that they turn to terrorism in the name of God. The paper examines the origins of terrorism, cultures of violence and the future of terrorism.
From the Paper
"Juergensmeyer's ideas discussed in the book go against what most criminological theories of crime causation tell us. Rational Choice theory, which is the theory used almost exclusively in today's criminal justice field, believes that criminals choose to commit crime by weighing the potential benefits versus the potential risks. (Siegal, 107). This assumption that offenders make a rational informed decision affects crime prevention strategies (Siegal, 129). The religious terrorist, however, is in a cosmic frame of mind where moral religious values override any sense of legal right or wrong."
| |
|
History of Terrorism, 2004.
This paper discusses the history of terrorism from ancient to modern times.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This article looks at the history of terrorism from ancient to modern times. The writer defines terrorism and its roots. The writer also discusses different types of terrorism: state terrorism and non-state terrorism. The paper looks at the many forms of terrorism.
Brief Historical Overview of Terrorism
Introduction and Purpose
Definition of Terrorism
Purpose
Brief History of Terrorism
Roots of Terrorism
Ancient History
Modern History
Types of Terrorism
State Terrorism
Non-State Terrorism
Responding to Terrorism
Identifying Proper Targets
Conclusions
Works Cited
From the Paper
"Any academic definition of terrorism would refer to a violent act omitted by individuals or a group not during a war undertaken in order to achieve a political goal. Modern forms of political terrorism became popular ... "
| |
|
Terrorism, 2005.
A comparison of the views of Noam Chomsky and Michael Ignatieff on terrorism the Western world and the war on terror.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay compares the conception of the term "terrorism" by Noam Chomsky in "Who are the Global Terrorists" and Michael Ignatieff in "Liberty and Armageddon". The paper argues that both have essentially different views on this subject and it discusses each of their views in detail, pointing out in which ways they differ most.
From the Paper
"Terrorism as Defined by Noam Chomsky and Michael Ignatieff Two positions on global terror could not be more different than those taken by Noam Chomsky in "Who are the Global Terrorists?" and Michael Ignatieff in "Liberty and Armageddon." In both articles, the respective authors deal with the topic of modern global terrorism. However, they display a markedly different understanding of the issue. Chomsky argues that the Western liberal democracies, lead by the United States and Israel, have been guilty for decades of countless cases of state sponsored terrorism and transgressions, while Michael Ignatieff completely ignores potential Western guilt while arguing for an increase in the effort of the war on terror."
| |
|
Protecting Ourselves against Terrorism, 2007.
An analysis of the consequences of terrorism and attempts to protect ourselves against terrorism.
2,995 words (approx. 12.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 62.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the way the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack has affected people's ability to discuss terrorism dispassionately. The paper begins by defining terrorism and then presents some possible causes of terrorism. The paper suggests the United States' responsibility in dealing with terrorism and gives the writer's personal view on the issue.
Table of Contents:
Causes of Terrorism
What is Terrorism?
Protecting Ourselves from Terrorism- a) Follow International Law
Protecting Ourselves from Terrorism- b) Domestic Measures
Conclusions
From the Paper
"Terrorism is such a misused word that one person's terrorist is another ones freedom fighter. Bin Laden and his criminal gang were described as 'Mujahideen- the Holy Warriors' by the western media and their indiscriminate terrorist attacks during soviet occupation and pro-soviet Afghan government days were projected as freedom struggle and acts of bravery. The international politics has thus not permitted building a formal definition. The United States Congress has defined [22 U.S.C. [sections] 2656 f(d)(1)-(2) (1994)] "terrorism" as "premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents"; "international terrorism" is defined as "terrorism involving citizens or the territory of more than 1 country" [Reisman, 1999]. This definition does not consider state terrorism or state sponsored terrorism, which is often the case, as international terrorism often requires a hideout and a sympathetic or covertly supporting state."
| |
|
Terrorism and Transnational Crime, 2005.
This paper is a literature review of terrorism pre and post 9/11, the relationship of money laundering to terrorism using the Colombian narco-traffickers as a model and the relationship of transnational crime and terrorism.
4,120 words (approx. 16.5 pages), 52 sources, MLA, £ 78.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the literature states the necessity of extending the scope of terrorism to include related trends of drug-trafficking, organized crime and unlawful migration to America because these trends serve as breeding grounds to terroristS who have been looking for newer ways to broaden the terrorist funding base. The author points out that the literature indicates that the methodology adopted by the drug mafia in Columbia, to distribute their narcotics at the global level and subsequently to use that money to fund organizations creating civil unrest, has been adopted by the terrorists in the Middle East. The paper relates that literature discusses the actions taken by global institutions at the forefront of global anti-money laundering administration and reviews some fundamentals of the critical anti-money laundering law, such as the constant attrition of confidentiality and the obligation of augmented necessities of carefulness.
Table of Contents
Terrorism
Analysis of Literature on Terrorism Pre-Post 9/11
Money Laundering
Relationship between the Colombian Narco-Traffickers and Colombian Insurgency
Trans-national Organized Crime and Terrorism
From the Paper
"Michael Reisman (1999) gives a fair review of the past and the present actions and procedures of calculated and politically provoked violent non-government groups. Many critics have questioned the unwillingness of the American courts to prosecute terrorist activities that have taken place outside American grounds. Michael reviews the reasons behind the reluctance of the American courts to take legal action in these scenarios. He also reviews the dilemma of the incompetent countries whose soil has been exploited as a foundation for terrorist training and terrorist activities against other countries, particularly the United States. Similarly, Peter Chalk (1998) reviews a number of terrorist events which could have resulted in greater understanding and classification of terrorism and the fundamentals that serve as driving forces for terrorist acts. He concludes his study by creating a model for responding to terrorist actions within the customs of political and social legality."
|
|
|
