| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "MALCOLM X": |
|
|
Malcolm X, 2006.
An examination of the book "The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told To Alex Haley", by Malcolm X and Alex Haley.
2,422 words (approx. 9.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this examination of "The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley", by Malcolm X and Alex Haley, the author highlights many pertinent points from the book and about the life of Malcolm X. The author tells us that the book looks at the era in which Malcolm X lived as a time when racism was running rampant in the United States. As a result of his experiences Malcolm X became an angry activist who hated everything that white society represented. The paper describes how Malcolm X himself became a racist and he believed that all whites were evil, after his conversion to Islam. The author delves into this further pointing out what made Malcolm X change his way of thinking to become a well known civil rights activist, who is still thought of in a positive light today. Finally the paper reiterates the major changes that Malcolm X went through during his life to make him a key leader of the black civil rights movement in the United States.
From the Paper
"Malcolm continued to have a great loyalty to Muhammad, even when Muhammad became too old to actively participate in Nation events. Malcolm then became more and more active in the groups decision making processes. It was at this time that Malcolm and Muhammad noticed that have had some differences in ideology. While they both wished to fight for black rights, Muhammad's goal was to create a completely separate black nation-state that would have a different economy and culture than the rest of the country. Malcolm, however, believed that this would only happen if they took care of the poor black people living in ghettos first. Malcolm wanted the group to become more involved with politics and to change America as a whole, rather than just trying to separate black America from white America. These differing philosophies, as well as Malcolm's growing influence led to Muhammad trying to have Malcolm killed. While this was very difficult for Malcolm, it led to another change in philosophy for him."
| |
|
"Malcolm X"?.
This paper discusses Spike Lee's film, "Malcolm X ," an adaptation of "The Autobiography of Malcolm X".
920 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Spike Lee's film, "Malcolm X," depicts the way Malcolm X, in prison, forged his identity based on social and religious values, not the values of the dominant white culture, but rather values in opposition to the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant culture, which, for centuries, had oppressed persons of African descent. The author points out that Malcolm X was a sincere adherent to Islam, which was not the religion of his African ancestors, but the religion of modern Africa. The paper relates that Spike Lee demonstrates how, when Malcolm X embraced Sunni Islam and incorporated its teachings into his approach toward black liberation, his militant views became more tempered; this shift from pure militancy toward cooperation directly led to his assassination.
From the Paper
"As Lee's movie shows, Malcolm's family history and early experiences affected his radical political views. He joined the Nation of Islam while in prison, as he felt a sense of camaraderie and solidarity that he never would have found in the outside world. Lee depicts how Malcolm X was deeply and personally affected by his exposure to the Muslim religion. In fact, one of the most remarkable things about the life of Malcolm X was his ability to grow with his religious beliefs, rather than having his religious beliefs dictate strictly what his actions were. As the film points out, Malcolm X did the necessary pilgrimage to Mecca shortly before he was assassinated."
| |
|
Invisible Man and Malcolm X, 2005.
A literary review and comparison of Ralph Ellison's "Invisible Man" and "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" by Malcolm X.
1,610 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts Ralph Ellison's novel, "Invisible Man" and Malcolm X's "The Autobiography of Malcolm X". The paper focuses on the sociological and political ideologies illustrated in the two books. The author of the paper highlights how the search for self-definition is a major theme of the analysis.
From the Paper
"It was an era of racism segregation and inequality during which Ralph Ellison and Malcolm X lived. Lacking equal protections in law comparable to Whites. African Americans endured second-class citizen status in American ..."
| |
|
"The Autobiography of Malcolm X", 2002.
This paper provides an analysis of Malcolm X's views on racism in America in "The Autobiography of Malcolm X".
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the main themes that are covered in the work "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" by Malcolm X. By understanding the main ideas behind his view on racism in America, the writer demostrates the different view of a black that fought hard for equal rights, within the period of the civil rights era. Some of the basics precepts of his work are examined, as well as the core ideas that represent his thought in the struggle for equality of the races in the United States.
| |
|
Malcolm X and Eliezer, 2002.
A comparison of Malcolm X and the prophet Eliezer.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is about the experiences and reactions of Malcolm X at various instances in his life. While Eliezer resigned and submitted to agony, Malcolm X rose to transform himself through a similar kind of struggle. Both suffered injustice. When Eliezer saw the Jews in misery and the immense amount of pain, he lost his belief in God after doubting much. But the misery encountered by Malcolm X only made him want to change and to make things real. Malcolm X became a strong believer in God.
| |
|
"The Autobiography of Malcolm X", 2009.
A review of the book "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" by Alex Haley.
1,609 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses "The Autobiography of Malcolm X", which tells the story of one of the most influential black leaders of the 1960s, Malcolm X, born in Omaha, Nebraska as Malcolm Little. It looks at how the book shows Malcolm X as a real man, with flaws, dreams, and hopes for the future. It also discusses how the book shows that Malcolm X truly hated "white devils," and how it is easy to see why so many people were frightened of him and his messages.
From the Paper
"Haley's and Malcolm X's thesis for writing this book is quite simple. Haley wanted to share Malcolm's life in largely his own words, so blacks and whites would understand a little more about this man who made such a difference in many people's lives, and inspired fear and misunderstanding in so many whites. In Haley's Epilogue to Malcolm's story, he writes of trying to convince Malcolm to tell his story. Finally, Malcolm agrees. Haley writes, "He said, 'I agree. I think my life story may help people to appreciate better how Mr. Muhammad salvages black people. But I don't want my motives for this misinterpreted by anybody - the Nation of Islam must get every penny that might come to me'" (Haley 386). Clearly, this is the thesis of this work, and this represents the popularity of the work, as well. First published in 1965, it is still popular and studied today, indicating just how far-reaching Malcolm X's life truly was."
| |
|
Malcolm X, 2006.
A study on Malcolm X.
1,919 words (approx. 7.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, £ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a study on Malcolm X. It explores his personal history, explains how he became the official spokesperson for the Nation of Islam, examines his beliefs and brings to light how Malcolm X grew to be an internationally recognized political figure head in the fight for racial equality. The paper also examines the effects of Malcolm X's philosophies and actions on society today.
From the Paper
"In 1964 Malcolm X founded the OAAU. The OAAU represented the outcome of numerous discussions that Malcolm X had with militant revolutionary nationalists throughout the country. In the same year the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was passed. On February 28, 1963, President Kennedy sent Congress his long-awaited message on civil rights legislation. The need for legislative action was forthrightly stated: "The [black] baby born in America today . . . has about one-half as much chance of completing high school as a white baby born in the same place on the same day--one-third as much chance of completing college--one-third as much chance of becoming a professional man--twice as much chance of becoming unemployed-- . . . a life expectancy which is seven years less--and the prospects of earning only half as much.""
| |
|
Rhetoric of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, 2002.
Compares and contrasts love and violence in the rhetoric of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This study will discover the implied audiences of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, and seek to understand, in their speeches, whom exactly they were both trying to speak too. This implies an audience with conservative whites who may have been in mind when these great speakers sent out their message. By studying the approach of rhetoric in their speeches, we can quickly see why they depicted different, but similar messages in their speeches. The two speeches from both men are: "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by MLK, and "The Black Revolution." By Malcolm X. IN analyzing these means of communication, we can see the message pf fear that Malcolm X sent out to his audience, and the contrasting message of Love that Martin Luther King brought out to his white audience.
| |
|
Malcolm X's Freedom Speech, 2008.
Examines the rhetorical devices used by Malcolm X in his "Prospects for Freedom in 1965" speech.
950 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Malcolm X was one of the most awe-inspiring orators of the twentieth century. Using his oratory skills, Malcolm X gave a speech called "Prospects for Freedom in 1965", with the goal of educating the Caucasian audience about the plight of the Afro-American while serving as an almost rallying-cry to prepare his fellow Afro-American brothers and sisters for the harsh realities of the upcoming year. The paper describes the plethora of rhetorical devices used by Malcolm X in this speech, such as rhetorical questions, repetitions, colloquialistic expressions, logos, pathos and ethos.
From the Paper
"Yet another example of Malcolm's desire to effectively communicate with his audience is in the form of his use of repetition, which can be defined as "the repeated use of the same word or word pattern".("Repetition") Throughout the entire discourse, many themes, motifs and words reappear so that he can stress and emphasize the certain themes and ideas. For example, within the introductory paragraphs, Malcolm constantly expresses "it's my [his] third time here" (X 147). This is an attempt to force the fact that he is a competent and experienced speaker."
| |
|
Martin Luther King Jr. vs. Malcolm X, 2008.
A comparative analysis of the attitudes and policies of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X in the fight for civil rights.
1,077 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X both fought for the cause of civil rights, defended the same color of people, combated the same problem of racism, and paid for this resistance to black oppression with their lives, and yet held two completely different plans to bring an end to racial discrimination. The paper relates that their conflicting values in this regard are made apparent in Martin Luther King Jr.'s "Letter from Birmingham Jail" and Malcolm X's "Message to the Grass Roots" and that these values lead to two completely different ideas about how to end racial discrimination. Through a comparison of the content of these two works, it attempts to show that Martin Luther King Jr. shows more promise as a leader than Malcolm X through his sound reasoning, flexibility, and a classier way of classification.
From the Paper
"King, however, acknowledges that society is multi-faceted (which is not surprising for one who graduated with a sociology degree); he mentions five different people groups in his letter: the white supremacists, the white moderates, the complacent Negroes, the black nationalists, and the nonviolent abolitionists. Like Malcolm X, King also brings up upper-middle class blacks in a negative light, but he describes them as "complacent," not controlling or power-hungry. King goes onto mention the other end of the Negro community spectrum, the black nationalists led by Malcolm X, and rather than taking an attacking approach of his rival, he explains that X's violent cause is the result of the people's immense frustration with racial discrimination (King 520). "I have tried to stand between these two forces saying that we need not follow the 'do-nothing-ism' of the complacent or the hatred and despair of the black nationalist." (King 520) His proposal for responding to racism is to stay in between the two extremes of the Negro community by practicing nonviolent protest - to be firm, but not belligerent."
| |
|
"Malcolm X", 2005.
The paper discusses Spike Lee's representation of "Malcolm X," trying to determine the political message that this film attempts to communicate.
2,086 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 10 sources, MLA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The author argues that, while Spike Lee's "Malcolm X" can be interpreted as an expression of African-Americans' desire to demonstrate that they powerfully stood up for their rights and demanded equal treatment, it cannot be considered an historical reference or source for the era, the rise of the Nation of Islam, or the emergence of Malcolm X as a nationalist symbol for black Americans. It explains that the film neither presents facts accurately nor comprehensively. In addition, it offers a mythical, not realistic, image of Malcolm X. The writer concludes that there is a need to establish certain standards of accuracy for historical films while accepting the director's right to creativity.
From the Paper
"American history, like the history of any other country, does not represent the viewpoint, experiences and struggles of the minority groups and lower classes. History is the history of the victors and the more powerful groups in a country. In "Revisioning History," Robert A Rosenstone quotes the Latin American historical filmmaker, Humberto Solas, as protesting against this saying, "because our history has been filtered through a bourgeoisie lens, we have been compelled to live with terrible distortions" (828). Most probably many African Americans would agree with Solas because American history has usually been presented as a white American history, both in films and textbooks. In "Subject to Countermemory," Maurice E. Stevens describes the way that American history has treated the black race as having "traditionally dehumanized or dehistoricized" them (278). American history, therefore, has not represented the African Americans and has written a mainly white history. However, the white American history has often been challenged by active African Americans who want to record the role that their people played in the nation's history and which, to some degree, helped shape the United States. One of these active African Americans is the filmmaker Spike Lee. In 1992 Spike Lee produced, helped write and directed the epic film "Malcolm X.""
| |
|
Biography of Malcolm X, 2009.
A review of the life of Malcolm X and his fight for equality and respect for African-Americans.
2,009 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses and analyzes the life of Malcolm X, discusses the context of Malcolm X's life and describes his character. The paper notes that Malcolm X is still remembered as one of the founding fathers of the Civil Rights Movement, however his outspoken criticism of the American government and its dealings with Black Americans cost him his life, but created a legacy that is still powerful and significant even today. The paper highlights that his character was molded by the experiences of his life, and became more flexible as he matured.
Outline:
Social Elements
Political Elements
Cultural Elements
Legacy
From the Paper
"Malcolm's spiritual awakening began after he began serving a 10-year sentence in prison for burglary (he served seven years). While he was in prison, he became interested in the Nation of Islam, and became a strong supporter of their radical ideas about race. They believed that complete and total segregation was the only way to manage the racial problem in America. Of course, this idea was unpopular with many whites and blacks, but it indicates how malleable Malcolm's character was, because he would undergo several significant changes throughout his life, largely due to his personal growth and alterations of his core beliefs."
| |
|
The Transformations Of Malcolm X, 2004.
This essay looks at the changes and transformations in the life of Malcolm X.
678 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 14.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the writer discusses the significant factors that influenced Malcolm Little to become Malcolm X. The writer then examines Malcolm X's transformation to El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz. The writer offers biographical information in this article. The writer also discusses Malcolm X's conversion to the Black Muslim movement while in prison. The writer concludes by looking at his assassination.
From the Paper
"Behind every significant figure in world history is a series of events, persons and social institutions that dramatically shaped his or her conscience, convictions and beliefs. Perhaps the most influential factor in the life of a struggling oppressed young person is that of religion. Religion offers hope. It offers reason. It offers redemption. For Black Americans in the middle of the twentieth century the rising Islamic tradition in American known then as Black Muslims gave such hope to a generation of bitterly oppressed ... "
| |
|
Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X, 2003.
A comparative analysis of the philosophies of Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X.
1,380 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares the philosophies of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X as civil rights activists. It looks at the differences in their methods, King's belief in civil disobedience and nonviolence and Malcolm X's belief in the use of aggressive action violence. It also looks at the committment of both to social change and considers the challenges that current civil rights leaders face.
|
|
|
