| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "LOCKE REWARDS PUNISHMENTS": |
|
|
Locke's Rewards and Punishments, 2005.
An analysis of John Locke's theory on reward and punishment.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how John Locke's theory of reward and punishment is founded on the link not between the child and society but between the father and society. The paper further discusses how "the child" actually refers to the son, and the training is intended to prepare the son for his future active role in the society. The paper analyzes how Locke is opposed to corporal punishment, but the alternative which he proposes amounts to psychological abuse. The worst aspect of the theory is that society then continues the training in a pattern of praise and condemnation.
| |
|
Reward and Punishment, 2003.
A review of the reinforcement theory.
774 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the reinforcement theory, the theory that holds that consequences either increase or decrease a behavior. The paper reviews the positive and negative aspects of this theory and reviews arguments in favor and against this theory.
From the Paper
"Still other researchers such as Baron (1977) state that punishment can work under certain conditions: "(a) if you can punish almost every time, (b) punish immediately, (c) punish in socially acceptable ways, and (d) do not punish harshly or become overly angry." Regardless of scientific evidence or suspected measures that would make punishment more effective, the intent of punishment in Reinforcement Theory is to suppress inappropriate behavior, not to solve underlying problems. Considering the scope of the application of punishment, it is, in many instances, neither practical nor desirable to replace punishment with a rewards system. Crime is an obvious example. True, suppression may only be short term with punishment as the only redress, but this is why the length of the prison sentence is designed to match the severity of the crime."
| |
|
Capital Punishment, Impractical Punishment, 2000.
This paper examines the moral, political and biblical standpoints with regard to the death penalty..
1,375 words (approx. 5.5 pages), 5 sources, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay is an argumentative paper which states both sides of the death penalty controversy and is opposition to capital punishment. The author chooses multiple points for, and against, the use of capital punishment regarding moral, ethical, and biblical standpoints.
From the paper:
?From the beginning of recorded history, there has always been a great deal of controversy over the concept of capital punishment. Is it moral? Is it a deterrent to crime? Is it effective? Is it efficient? Is it cruel and unusual punishment? These are all questions that we ask when discussing such a delicate topic. There are a wide variety of reasons as to why people are for or against the death sentence. Some are reasoned; others are purely emotional. From my point of view, capital punishment is not a deterrent to crime, and I don?t believe it should be in use today.?
| |
|
Rewards in Business, 2005.
A discussion aimed at understanding the use of the classic system of Pavlov's principles in modern business reward systems.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes Pavlov's principles revolving around the classic system of rewards and punishments as still effective in today's organizational management application. The paper suggests that although a group of leaders may implement a series of rewards for the best employees, new ways should be created to increase a greater understanding of how ideas and job function should be rewarded.
From the Paper
"Business: Understanding the Use of the Classic System in Modern Business Reward Systems In this business study, one can examine the nature of reward systems that arise within business ethics and classical conditioning formats that have arisen in management techniques. By analyzing data and the classic system theory on reward systems in business, the basis for reward systems does not seem to falter in the modern milieu of business management application. In essence, although classical conditioning is an old theory in creating incentives and rewards for management to develop organizational unity and compliance, it is still a commonly used principle within business management systems. The issue of presenting goals and opportunities for advancement in organizational management has been a crucial factor in growth and discipline within business practice. Pavlov's reward systems reflect a tangible way to help incorporate the "classic system" that is currently practiced within modern theory."
| |
|
John Locke and Private Property, 2002.
Examines the views of philosopher John Locke on the subject of property.
1,025 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
John Locke wrote at a time of social unrest and questioning, at a time when the long-standing sovereignty of kings as ordained by God was being questioned. Locke did not see the power of kings as derived from the will of God but rather as developing as the result of some social condition. The paper shows that Locke asked first what state man would be in if there were no government and he found that human beings originated in the state of nature, the state that existed before human beings came together to form a society and a government. It shows that Locke saw this state of nature as placing the individual into a state of perfect freedom, with no necessity to ask any other person before determining his or her own actions or disposing of their own property. Property was an essential element in Locke's thinking, with the relationship of the individual to his property as being of paramount importance. The paper shows that the ownership of property was seen as a fundamental right, meaning that it was a right born in the state of nature. For Locke, the defense of individual liberty is inseparable from the defense of private property.
From the Paper
"The individual in society does not have absolute freedom, showing that something has been lost from the state of nature. Locke sees human beings as having agreed to give up certain rights and powers through some form of agreement. Society is thus formed when men cede certain powers to a central authority. Private property rights are to be protected by this state that has been created--human beings have given up certain rights in order to assure the protection of their property from the depredations of others. Locke traces the concept of private property from the time when God gave the world to Adam and his posterity. Locke sees political power as being "for the regulating and preserving of property" (Locke 4), among other things."
| |
|
John Locke, 2007.
This paper discusses the life and views of John Locke, arguably one of the most influential philosophers of all time.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer presents a detailed examination of John Locke from a political sociological viewpoint. The writer examines Locke's position on an individual's place in nature, as well as his ideas concerning the state and the individual and society. The writer points out that Locke believed that people had rights and that if those rights were challenged they had the ability and the right to rise up and dismantle the government that challenged them. Further, the writer notes that Locke felt that human beings had the right to live freely and without fear, if they had ideas that went against the majority of that time. The writer concludes with a discussion about Locke's views and their relevance in today's society.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Major Issues
Place in Nature
Politically Speaking
Today
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"During Locke's lifetime there were several major societal issues that were being dealt with. It was as time of great political unrest and it was a time in which religion played a much more important role in the daily lives of people than it does today.
The religious aspect of life was closely tied to the political outcomes during the era in which Locke lived. The religious leaders were given a significant amount of power in deciding what the laws and rules of the land would be and the King's religious beliefs were those that everyone was expected to believe in and follow.
In addition, science was at a point in society that threatened many of the ideas and beliefs that mankind had held dear for so many years. With the work of Isaac Newton and others beginning to disprove many things that society had readily accepted in the past it was a scary and unsure time for society and the foundation by which it had built itself on.
It was an era in which speaking out against a religious conviction held by the King could get one imprisoned or killed."
| |
|
John Locke's Philosophy of Government, 2007.
This paper examines the work of several critics in order to analyze the meaning of political power as presented by John Locke in his "The Second Treatise of Civil Government".
3,850 words (approx. 15.4 pages), 6 sources, APA, £ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Locke suggestion, in his "The Second Treatise of Civil Government", that establishing the rule of law without the use of force is not easy; however, Locke's discussion is clouded not only by vagueness but also by the fact that he "says too much". The author stresses that there is evidence that John Locke indeed supported the American colonies' drive for freedom. The paper relates that Locke points out specifically in his "Second Treatise" that taking property without the will and consent of the people is against both natural law and the fiduciary nature of civil authority.
Table of Contents:
The Limits and Functions of Government
Political Power
Hobbes on Sovereignty
Does Locke Trust People Too Much?
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In fact, the British had repealed the Stamp Act after the colonies dumped tea in Boston harbor and otherwise rebelled against heavy-handed British rule; the colonies also objected to the very fact that they had come over to the new world seeking both religious freedom and a chance to get a new start economically. And from far away in England, came oppressive rule and taxation "without representation." Locke expressed - in his Letter on Toleration, which was "highly esteemed in New England" and which "the care of souls cannot belong to the civil magistrate," ..."
| |
|
John Locke and Politics, 2004.
A look at the contributions of English philosopher, John Locke, to political philosophy.
1,239 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how John Locke?s theory of politics was greatly influenced by the period dealing with consolidation of power in England, a time when King William was beginning to challenge the domination of Europe by King Louis XIV of France. It discusses John Lock's theory of government and property rights, which were the cornerstone of his book, "Treaties of Government".
Introduction
John Locke?s Philosophy on Government and Property
My Reflections on Locke?s Theory of Government and Property Rights
Locke?s Property Rights Vs. Pursuit of Happiness
From the Paper
"There were also conflicts between Protestants, Anglicans and Catholics. These difficulties eventually led to a civil war in England {1640s}. King Charles I was defeated in the war and there were intellectual debates about what type of government and institutions should be in place. The debates also focused on such other issues as the abolishment of the monarchy, the Anglican Church and the House of Lords. The establishment of Oliver Cromwell?s Protectorate, which ended with Cromwell?s death in 1650, followed this period."
| |
|
John Locke, 2007.
A discussion of John Locke's philosophy.
951 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 6 sources, APA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines John Locke's philosophy and its impact on the Enlightenment. The author describes how some of Locke's outlooks were considered heresy. His essays and presentations did much to usher in an entirely new way of thinking, and this is why he has been called the father of Enlightenment. The paper includes many quotes by Locke and analyzes two of his treatises. The paper concludes with a biographical background of Locke and how his life may have influenced his philosophy.
From the Paper
" A look at Locke's early life shows why his thinking was so well rounded. He first was trained in an area of study that would have led him to become a 'man of the cloth' but instead of choosing that direction he turned to medicine as a field of study. Eventually he was granted the right to practice medicine, and did so, but also began to study in his quest to become a member of the Royal Society. Much of his training had to do with the manner of mankind's attempts to think from both a spiritual aspect and a physical aspect. His assertions included a mixture of many different areas, including; spiritual, medical, physical as well as external and internal influences on mankind's thinking process and the ideas and knowledge gained by those processes."
|
| Essay # 38118 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
John Locke.
This paper discusses the literature and the works of philosopher John Locke.
1,065 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although John Locke is best known today as a philosopher whose thinking and writing had, and continues to have, an enormous impact on democratic institutions, he also was an Oxford University scholar, a medical researcher and physician, a political operative, an economist, and an ideologue. The author points out that Locke's writings did not always carry the weight that they do today; but today, Locke's writings are used by a diverse assortment of organizations, including the National Rifle Association, to bolster or justify their positions. The paper relates that Locke had a marvelous way of putting the human condition into simple yet profound terms; for example, one of his famous quotes is "A sound mind in a sound body is a short but full description of a happy state in this world."
From the Paper
"Locke had seen what happened to society when the powers of the church and of the government were combined: "...churches frequently used the force of the state to promote and enforce their interests and doctrines." This combination of church and state "caused horrendous atrocities against Jews and heretics, as well as the European religious wars between Catholics and Protestants" in the 16th and 17th Centuries, which resulted in millions of deaths. In his writings - which later influenced Jefferson and Madison to add "the right of religious freedom" into the Bill of Rights to the Constitution - Locke agreed that force was sometimes necessary when the state needed to punish a person for violating "any other man's rights.""
| |
|
John Locke, 2005.
This paper discusses John Locke's theory on politics and the establishment of government.
1,695 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Locke (1632-1704), English philosopher and social scientist, founded the school of empiricism and applied empirical analysis to ethics, politics and religion, was the guiding light for the founding fathers of the United States during the American Revolution; and his thoughts on politics and government are incorporated in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution. The author points out that, in the present day, post-socialist world, Locke's liberalism is more relevant than ever since there is once again a danger in Western societies to move in a direction in which social justice and compassion for the weak, civil liberty and the rights of minorities are being put on the back-burner. The paper relates that Locke's views about politics and the government are still relevant and have stood the test of time three hundred years after his death when several other political theories such as Socialism have fallen by the wayside because of the balance of his ideas.
Table of Contents
Political Theories
Political Liberalism: Refutation of Hobbes
Natural Rights
Social Contract
Nature of Government: Separation of Powers
Views on Tax by the Government
The Right to Revolt
Agreeing with John Locke
From the Paper
"His theory about the establishment of government appeared at a time in Western history when a transition from the standard monarchial form of government to a more representative form of government was taking place. It was a crucial period. If John Locke's liberal ideas about the sovereignty of the people and their right to place their trust in a government for advancing their interests through a 'social contract' (and their right to change it if the trust was breached) had not been put across with the force of empirical logic, there was every chance that authoritarianism would have become the norm in Western societies. In the seventeenth century Europe, it was only John Locke's genius that managed to stop the formidable political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes in its tracks: the philosophy that advocated absolutism and concentration of power, albeit in a group of people (the legislature) rather than in an individual-- the monarch."
| |
|
Bennett and Lennon on Locke, 2008.
A comparison of the views of Jonathan Bennett and Thomas Lennon, concerning John Locke's conception of ideas and qualities.
1,230 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how John Locke's distinction between ideas and qualities, outlined in his "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding", would become a point of contention between Jonathan Bennett and Thomas Lennon. In particular, the paper takes a look at Bennet's book "Learning from Six Philosophers" and Lennon's critical article "Bennett on Ideas and Qualities in Locke's Essay". The paper concludes that Locke can be confusing at times because the distinction between ideas and qualities is not always clearly drawn in the text, but the ideas are more clear when closely examined by later thinkers.
From the Paper
"In 1996, Jonathan Bennett offered his own version of a standard objection raised against Locke, that the distinction between ideas and qualities is ill-formed and exposes a fundamental confusion about ideas and qualities that runs throughout Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Bennett says that Locke tends to use the word "idea" to mean "quality." Bennett also says that the distinction is intended to be clear and that Locke addresses it by stating that whatever the mind perceives in itself is an idea, while qualities are those "ideas" that are produced I the mind by sensation of the object and quality in question. Locke uses a snowball as an example and says the snowball itself produces the ideas of white, cold, and round. These are qualities because they are ideas that are in the snowball and then imparted to the mind as the mind experiences the snowball."
| |
|
John Locke and Consent, 2004.
Discussion of Locke's argument that consent is the only basis for legitimate political authority.
1,444 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper emphasizes Locke?s contention on consent, according to which Locke states that consent is the only basis for legitimate political authority. Consideration and analysis of this contention, along with discussions of the following questions are elaborated further in the essay. What are Astell's criticisms of Locke on consent? Are they good ones? Why or why not? Are there others? Does Locke's criterion rule out too little or too much?
From the Paper
"John Locke was born in the year 1632; his name is still counted amongst the renowned philosophers of that era. Although he has written many works related to philosophy but he is widely known and accepted for his formulation of liberal political philosophy. John Locke presented his own views and opinions regarding the liberal political philosophy and gradually his formulation was read and understood."
|
|
|
