| Papers [1-14] of 45 :: [Page 1 of 4] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 —> | Search results on "LEADERSHIP GETTYSBURG": |
|
|
Leadership in "Gettysburg", 2007.
This paper discusses the leadership style of Colonel Joshua Chamberlain as depicted in the movie "Gettysburg".
766 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer studies the character of Colonel Joshua Chamberlain as portrayed in the movie "Gettysburg". The writer describes Chamberlain as an unlikely, scholarly and militarily untrained college professor-turned-soldier, who exhibits strong traits of authoritative leadership. The writer maintains that Chamberlain possesses excellent traits of leadership in war and that as the movie "Gettysburg" depicts, Colonel Joshua Chamberlain's leadership style was an authoritative one. The writer concludes that Chamberlain's personality, as Jeff Daniels plays him in "Gettysburg", is both reflective and more contemplative than those of any of the other principal military figures depicted in the movie. Further the writer notes that Chamberlain is also a man of action when he has to be and a very brilliant and successful one.
From the Paper
"It was Colonel Joshua Chamberlain's particular leadership genius at Round Top, in fact that, historically speaking, as well as within in the movie Gettysburg, arguably turned not only the Battle of Gettysburg, but the Civil War itself into a victory for the North, rather than for the South as it probably otherwise would have been. Chamberlain's most remarkable instance of leadership, nerve, and heroism, in the Battle of Gettysburg, and as shown within the movie Gettysburg, took place at Little Round Top. Chamberlain and his men had been sent there, by Colonel Strong Vincent, to defend Little Round Top's southern slope. But from there, nothing at all went as planned, and Chamberlain had to thing fast, and with enormous resourcefulness."
| |
|
Battle of Gettysburg, 2007.
This paper discusses the 21st North Carolina and the Iron Brigade at the Battle of Gettysburg.
3,881 words (approx. 15.5 pages), 26 sources, APA, £ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer aims to sort out the rhetoric from the fact regarding the Battle of Gettysburg. The writer notes that given its importance, it is not surprising that Gettysburg is the most studied battle in the history of America. The paper first provides an overview of the Battle of Gettysburg in general. This is then followed by an assessment of the role played by the 21st North Carolina and the Iron Brigade. A summary of the research and salient findings are provided in the conclusion. The writer concludes that perhaps it is difficult for people in the 21st century to fully understand what these events meant to the soldiers who were actually fighting the frequently hand-to-hand and always bloody battles of McPherson Woods, Cemetery and Culp's Hill, but it is clear from the research that the men of the 21st North Carolina and the Iron Brigade ardently believed in what they were fighting for, and were willing to die for their causes.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Following the defeat of the Union forces of General Joseph Hooker at Chancellorsville, Virginia, in May, Confederate General Robert E. Lee made the decision to invade the North in an attempt to dissuade them from further incursions and with an eye to compelling European countries into recognizing the Confederacy, and Lee's invasion army totaled approximately 75,000 troops. Upon learning that the Union Army of the Potomac had a new commander, General George G. Meade, Lee ordered General R. S. Ewell to move to Cashtown or Gettysburg; however, the commander of Meade's advance cavalry, General John Buford, recognized the strategic importance of Gettysburg as a road center and was prepared to hold this site until reinforcements arrived."
| |
|
The Gettysburg Documents, 2007.
This paper examines two documents about the Battle of Gettysburg, a historic battle of the Civil War.
1,637 words (approx. 6.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the documents "The First Day at the Battle of Gettysburg" and "The Third Day". These sources chronicle the Battle of Gettysburg, July 1-4, 1863, from the first-person experience of the two writers. The paper relates that the document "The First Day" covers the battle from the Union point of view and experience, and as a source for information on the battle, is a credible and genuine source. The paper shows how the second source that discusses the third day of battle at Gettysburg is also a genuine article created by an actual participant. The paper concludes that both articles are interesting to read and would contribute towards a better understanding of both sides during this pivotal battle.
From the Paper
"This document is significant for any number of reasons. First, it is a first person account of the actual first day of battle at Gettysburg, which proved to be a pivotal point in the Civil War. It is also significant for the amount of detail it contains, which can aid the historical researcher in any number of ways - from understanding the configuration of the battle and the participants, to giving a deeper comprehension of the significance of the battle to both North and South."
"The originality of the document is certainly without question. It is a first hand account of the battle, and while there are indeed similar documents, it stands on its own in its detail, complexity, and importance to historical research."
| |
|
Gettysburg and Antietam, 2007.
A discussion on the significance of the battles of Gettysburg and Antietam to the American Civil War.
1,326 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to introduce discuss and analyze the topic of the American Civil War. Specifically, it discusses the battles of Gettysburg and Antietam to determine which was the turning point of the war. It concludes that, although many believe the Battle of Antietam was the turning point in the Civil War, in reality the turning point was the Battle of Gettysburg, for a number of compelling reasons.
From the Paper
"In geographic space, the sites of two of the greatest battles of the Civil War, Antietam and Gettysburg, are only about an hour away from the each other. The Battle of Antietam was fought on September 17, 1862, outside the small town of Sharpsburg, Maryland. (The Confederates refer to this war as the Battle of Sharpsburg.) The Battle of Gettysburg was fought over several days in July 1863 in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, culminating with a Union victory on July 3, celebrated on July 4. Neither battle ended the war, and each battle was hugely significant at the time. However, Gettysburg was the turning point of the war, ultimately leading to Union victory and Confederate defeat. The war raged on for two more years after Gettysburg, but the South was never as strong or as successful after this battle."
| |
|
The Battle of Gettysburg, 2002.
A look at the causes and consequenecs of the Battle of Gettysburg.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This ten-page undergraduate paper discusses the events that led to the battle of Gettysburg. It also analyzes the actual events of the battle and how it finally ended, listing the implications of Gettysburg.
| |
|
The Battle of Gettysburg, 2002.
A summary of the historical Battle of Gettysburg which changed the course of the American Civil War.
1,002 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 5 sources, APA, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the Battle of Gettysburg which took over a period of three days during July, 1863. It describes how the battle was fought by 75,000 Confederate soldiers under the leadership of General Robert E. Lee and almost 84,000 Union soldiers who came under the command of General George G. Meade. The paper discusses how, with about 51,000 casualties and more than 10,000 soldiers dead, Gettysburg is considered to be one of the most tragic battles of the American history and one that changed the course of the Civil War.
From the Paper
"As the South fought to gain the higher ground General Lee ordered approximately 12,000 soldiers to march across an open field so that the center of the Federal army could be taken. This seemingly desperate assault was called the 'Pickett' s Charge' and was doomed to failure. The soldiers had more than a mile to cross and by the time the battle ended more than half the Confederate army was killed, wounded or captured. The battle had ended and the Civil War was accepted to be the victory for the North and yet, there was no joy for in the words of Joshua Chamberlain, ?In the presence of real tragedy you feel neither pain nor joy nor hatred, only a sense of enormous space and time suspended, the great doors open to black eternity, the rising across the terrible field of that last enormous, unanswerable question.? [Shaara, Foreword 6.]"
| |
|
Gettysburg, 2006.
A brief overview of the Battle of Gettysburg.
820 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper the author looks at the historical Battle of Gettysburg. He points out that even though the Battle of Gettysburg did not end the war, nor did it achieve any major war aim for the North or the South, it remains a great battle in the American civil war . The author looks at the personalities of the generals in command during the battle, and examines each of the stages of the battle. He starts with the pre-battle or planning stages, in which strategy was discussed. The paper proceeds to discuss the battle itself and what arms were used. He then discusses the post-battle and concludes with his view that, if the South had won, America would have been divided always opposing each other, and the world would have been a far different place.
Table of Contents:
Introduction and Fire Power
Pre Battle
Battle
Post Battle
From the Paper
"Artillery played a vital role in determining the outcome of the Battle of Gettysburg. Artillery units fought side by side with their infantry counterparts during all three days of the battle and Union guns made up the disparity during the July 3rd end known as Pickett's Charge. In fact, Confederate artillery units were not only armed with southern-made cannon, but a number of captured Union guns filled southern artillery organizations. Some northern states raised "independent" batteries, which were not attached to an artillery brigade. New York supplied fifteen independent batteries including Captain Andrew Cowan's 1st New York Battery and Captain Patrick Hart's 15th New York Battery, both of which fought at Gettysburg. Confederate batteries were, for the most part, labeled by the nicknames of where they were raised or by the name of the battery commander. (Hazlett 83)"
| |
|
Gettysburg, 2002.
A look at the historical importance and physical characteristics of Gettysburg.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This undergraduate paper presents two themes about Gettysburg and it's historical significance. The first theme involves the physical characteristics and atmosphere of Gettysburg in the past and present tense. The second theme deals with its historical importance, both past and present.
| |
|
The Battle of Gettysburg, 2007.
An analysis of the Battle of Gettysburg and the roles of the 26th North Carolina and the Iron Brigade.
3,478 words (approx. 13.9 pages), 30 sources, APA, £ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the Battle of Gettysburg in Pennsylvania in 1863. It discusses the battle in general terms and it then assesses the specific roles played by the 26th North Carolina and the Iron Brigade. The paper concludes that first-hand accounts and reports of gallantry of both of these units confirm that their men and officers earned and deserve continued recognition and respect from Americans today.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
The Iron Brigade
26th North Carolina
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Upon their arrival at Gettysburg, the Iron Brigade's 24th Michigan Regiment had 493 troops; by the end of the first day's battle, though, Richardson reports that less than 100 men were left alive, with the 24th having experienced approximately 80 percent casualties. "The Regiment has the dubious distinction of having the highest losses of any of the 400 union regiments engaged at Gettysburg." In his memoirs, Capt. Robert K. Beecham wrote that the battle between Archer's brigade and the Iron Brigade in McPherson Woods on the morning of July 1 was an "unadorned long-drawn-out line of ragged dirty blue against the long-drawn-out line of dirty, ragged butternut, with no 'pomp of war' about it, and no show or style except our old black hats.""
| |
|
Gettysburg, 2002.
A look at military lessons to be learnt from the Battle of Gettysburg.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 8 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This ten-page undergraduate paper examines and analyzes the mistakes made by the South which led to its defeat at the Battle of Gettysburg. The focus is primarily upon Pickett's Charge and the absence of Jeb Stuart's cavalry in the initial stages of the invasion of Pennsylvania, but other contributing factors are also discussed.
| |
|
The Battle of Gettysburg, 2007.
This paper describes the role of the 26th North Carolina and the Iron Brigade at the Battle of Gettysburg.
3,567 words (approx. 14.3 pages), 32 sources, APA, £ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the Battle of Gettysburg in general, followed by an assessment of how the roles played by the 26th North Carolina and the Iron Brigade during the first two days of battle helped to influence the outcome. A summary of the research and salient findings are presented. The author focuses on the role of leadership on both sides, as they appeared to play a critical role in the outcome of this infamous battle. The author also cites that it is clear from the research that the men of the 26th North Carolina and the Iron Brigade ardently believed in what they were fighting for, and were willing to die for their causes.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Figure 1. Uniform of the Iron Brigade
26th North Carolina
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Given its importance, it is not surprising that Gettysburg is the most studied battle in the history of America. In fact, Martin points out that, "Even before the fighting was over it was viewed as the most decisive battle of the Civil War, and a legion of writers have since recorded their narratives and offered their interpretations of the battle." Likewise, Andrews suggests that, "No battle of the Civil War appeals more to the popular imagination than the one which was fought near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, July 1, 2, and 3, 1863. Apart from the fact that this struggle, unlike most, is comparatively easy for the layman to understand; apart from the fact that it was one of the bloodiest battles in modern times -- the Battle of Gettysburg stands forth as a turning point in the history of the Civil War." The Battle of Gettysburg was fought during July 1-3, 1863, just 35 miles southwest of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Losses on both sides, though, were among the war's heaviest; of 88,000 Northern troops, casualties were approximately 23,000; from a total 75,000 Southerners, there were likewise more than 20,000. Two of the units that participated in the battles at Gettysburg that took place over the course of the next 3 days were the famed Iron Brigade of the Union and the equally tough 26th North Carolina of the Confederates, both of which received an inordinate number of casualties during the fighting that ensued. These units and their respective parts in the Battle of Gettysburg are discussed further below."
| |
|
The Battle of Gettysburg, 2007.
An examination of the 21st North Carolina and the Iron Brigade, at the Battle of Gettysburg.
3,895 words (approx. 15.6 pages), 26 sources, APA, £ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how, although it did not end the war, the Battle of Gettysburg was the turning point of the Civil War, and represented the true beginning of the end for the Confederacy. The paper examines how, in this costly battle, both the 21st North Carolina and the Iron Brigade experienced some of the heaviest losses, and both units were highly regarded as valorous and intrepid in their actions. The writer proposes that the first-hand accounts and reports of gallantry of both of these units confirm that the Iron Brigade lived up to its name, and the 21st North Carolina earned and deserved an honorary title of their own.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Figure 1. Uniform of the Iron Brigade
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"In fact, although the Union forces managed to exact a heavy toll on the Confederate forces at Gettysburg, Meade failed to take advantage of his strategic opportunity though and allowed the Southern forces to retreat without pursuing them across the Potomac. President Lincoln wrote Meade a letter written on July 14, 1863 (but it was never mailed) when he learned that Lee's Army of Northern Virginia had escaped back across the Potomac and had successfully avoided further battle with Meade's army; even though Meade never read the letter, it is illustrative of Lincoln's frustration with this lost opportunity and his general."
| |
|
"The Gettysburg Cyclorama", 2005.
A review of Robert Barker's painting "The Gettysburg Cyclorama" and its preservation and conservation.
3,570 words (approx. 14.3 pages), 9 sources, MLA, £ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper recapitulates the original history of "The Gettysburg Cyclorama" and preservation and conservation efforts made to date to maintain the quality and intent of its creator, Robert Barker. A three dimensional diorama with the prime objective of simulating reality, this amazing piece of artwork has steadily deteriorated despite several conservation efforts. It is currently undergoing a major multi-million dollar restoration project which is herein described.
Outline
Restorative History
Subsequent Assessments and Maintenance
Current Problems
Current Restorative Treatments
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In 1879, Paul Dominique Philippoteaux, an artist and professional cyclorama painter was commissioned by a group of entrepreneurs to paint the depiction of the final Confederate assault on Union troops for a special display in Chicago. He spent several weeks on the
battlefield, collecting details about the terrain and making hundreds of sketches. He hired a Gettysburg photographer to take a series of panoramic views of Cemetery Ridge, the Bloody Angle, and of course the field of Pickett's Charge. He also interviewed veterans of the Battle whose interpretations helped him to gain some perspective of the chaos they experienced."
| |
|
"Gettysburg: Day Three", 2002.
The paper introduces, discusses, and analyzes the book "Gettysburg: Day Three," by Jeffrey D. Wert.
2,130 words (approx. 8.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 45.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the book by Jeffrey D. Wert which is the story of one day in the Battle of Gettysburg, fought during the Civil War on a battlefield in Pennsylvania in 1863. Specifically, it discusses the purpose and thesis of the work, along with a critical judgment of the book's value in American history. The author is impressed with the new and fascinating information that is brought to the book and shows how it teaches a lesson in historic conquest ? that one battle can indeed turn the tide of an entire war.
From the Paper
"Wert declares "On Gettysburg's fields the country's past and future collided" (Wert 9), and this is his thesis for writing this book, to show the country of the past, moving inexorably forward to the country of the future as the battle is waged for Little and Big Round Top. The entire future of the country would have changed had the Confederate Army won the Battle of Gettysburg, for they were poised to march on Washington to take Lincoln and the White House. Wert's thesis is not only involved with war, it is involved with the sacrifices men made that day for freedom, and for what they believed in. "Rarely, if ever, had the army's rank and file fought so well as they had on this Thursday" (Wert 15)."
|
|
|
