| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "KROGSTAD NORAS FOIL CHARACTER IBSENS": |
|
|
|
Krogstad: Noras Foil Character In Ibsens "Doll's House", 2004.
A brief look at how Ibsen uses Krogstad as a foil character in his play.
678 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a brief look at how Henrik Ibsen uses Krogstad as a foil character in order to create more audience sympathy for Nora in his famous play, "The Doll's House".
From the Paper
"The ultimate goal of drama is believed to be the audience's suspension of disbelief for the brief time that they are watching the play. That said it does not follow that works of drama do not have other purposes as well. They are meant to make the audience think about the world beyond the stage about society and about the minds of individuals. Such is the case with Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House. Ibsen uses minor characters and subplot ..."
| |
|
"A Doll?s House", 2004.
An analysis of the characters in Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll?s House".
1,158 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Henrik Ibsen?s characters are not the people they appear to be. This paper explains that, on the surface, and at the beginning of the play, audiences see typical people pursuing typical lives with typical problems. Not until the play progresses, and in retrospect, do audiences realize that society negatively or positively stimulates the characters motives and actions. This paper looks at three such characters in Henrik Ibsen?s play, "A Doll?s House": Torvald; the protagonist, Nora; and the antagonist, Krogstad.
From the Paper
"Krogstad plays the role of the antagonist in A Doll?s House. His actions mirror the traditional role of an antagonist. He is the source of the play?s conflict and causes Nora to worry about resolving the seemingly irresolvable problem. He is the character that creates the tension in the play. Nora?s husband, Torvald Helmer, wants to fire Krogstad and Krogstad is desperate (Johnston). This is one clue to the Krogstad?s predicament and that he is not an antagonist in the formal sense of the word. When he hears of his impending job loss, he blackmails Nora. The two have forged Torvald?s signature to a bank note and now he threatens to tell Torvald. Despite this, Krogstad has valid motivations for his desperation. He wants to build up his reputation so that he can provide for his family. Unlike most antagonists, he does not act out of egotism; he acts out of love for his family."
| |
|
Nils Krogstad, 2005.
Examines the role of Nils Krogstand in Henrik Ibsen's play, "A Doll's House".
774 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows that while Nils Krogstad is a minor character in "A Doll's House", he has a major function. He becomes an instrument of truth for us and for Nora because his letter reveals Helmer's true nature. While Krogstad causes Nora much distress throughout the play, he is indirectly responsible for her freedom. His desperation and his letter open her eyes to the fact that she is a prisoner in her own home. The paper concludes that from this perspective, his character is necessary to understand Nora's plight in "A Doll's House".
From the Paper
"In order for Nora to help Krogstad, she would have to tell Helmer everything and she is not willing to do this. Krogstad refuses to accept her explanation and simply tells her, "if I lose my position a second time, you shall lose yours with me" (I.144). Here we see how far he is willing to go with her. His sympathy for her situation is short-lived when he realizes that everything he has is at stake."
| |
|
"A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen, 2005.
This paper analyzes the character of Nora in Ibsen's "A Doll's House."
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the character of Nora in Ibsen's play "A Doll's House" and examines her reasons for abandoning her husband and children at the end of the play. It is an argumentative paper, defending Nora's decision.
From the Paper
"Ibsen's "A Doll's House" was a very controversial play when it was first written in because of the character Nora and how she abandons her husband and children at the end of the play. Ibsen dealt with the problem of women's rights, not as an activist but as a facet of reality within his play. He wanted to bring the issue to light."
| |
|
Foils in "Hedda Gabler", 2005.
A comparison of three foil characters in Ibsen's "Hedda Gabler".
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 16.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison of three foil characters in Ibsen's play "Hedda Gabler": Tesman, Judge Brack and Ejlert Lovoborg. It examines how the three act as foils to one another, creating a better understanding of the motives and actions of each.
From the Paper
"In the play Hedda Gabler Ibsen uses intricate characterization to express the theme of sought independence throughout the play. Often he juxtaposes characters by placing them in similar situations ..."
| |
|
Nora in "A Doll?s House", 2006.
A literary analysis of the character Nora in Ibsen's "A Doll's House".
940 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House", a three-act play which affords the audience an insightful perspective on one woman's epiphany. The paper's analysis focuses on the character of Nora Helmer who, when the story opens, appears to be the prototypical pampered wife. The paper dissects Nora's relationship to her husband, and comments on the changes in that relationship as a metaphor for the transformation of women's role in society. The paper also analyzes several literary techniques used by Ibsen in the play, including the retrospective technique to reveal important incidents from the past as the play progresses. Finally, the paper explores the feminist undertones of the play, and its commentary on the position of women in the late 19th century.
From the Paper
"One soon learns that Nora is not quite the empty-headed spendthrift she appears. Rather, she has need of money in order to repay a debt owed Nils Krogstad from years past--one incurred in order to save her husband's life, but requiring that she forge her father's name. Her husband, of course, is completely unaware that all this has transpired. When Torvald assumes the bank presidency, Nora's creditor will lose his position there. So Krogstad threatens blackmail in an attempt to convince her to use her influence to save his job. Nora certainly tries, but Torvald is determined to dismiss Krogstad. The desperate man delivers a letter revealing his past association with the woman. After Torvald has read the letter and rejected Nora, Krogstad has a change of heart--at which point, so does Torvald. But it is too late. Nora realizes that her marriage to Torvald has never been a relationship between equals. She has lived with a stranger but cannot bear to continue as his mere toy, a doll in this doll's house. Nora leaves Torvald and her three children."
| |
|
Antigone and Nora, 2004.
This paper presents a comparison of the motives behind the actions of Antigone in Sophocles play "Antigone" and the actions of Nora Helmer in Ibsen's drama, "A Doll's House."
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper compares the motives behind the actions of Antigone in disobeying King Creon in Sophocles play "Antigone" and Nora Helmer's abandonment of her husband and family in Ibsen's drama, "A Doll's House."
From the Paper
"The play "Antigone" by Sophocles and "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen show many elements in common with respect to their heroines. In "Antigone" Antigone, the daughter of Oedipus, disobeys King Creon's orders of established law and buries her brother. In "A Doll's House" Nora rebels against her husband and confining role as housewife and mother and walks out on her family. Both women risk enormous odds by transgressing against civil and conventional law and both pay an enormous price."
| |
|
Nora in "A Doll's House", 2005.
A study of the character of Nora in Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House".
1,876 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper deals with Nora Helmer's heroic struggle to free herself from the oppressive domination and control of her husband, Torvald. It portrays Nora's attempt to assert her own identity and independence in the face of what she considers societal and marital imprisonment. It shows the the essence of the story is Nora's journey from an enforced and artificial child-like existence to her own personal declaration of independence in the world.
From the Paper
"In his play A Doll's House, Henrik Ibsen portrays, in a general sense, the oppressed and powerless role of women in a male dominated society. In a more particular sense, Ibsen dramatizes the story of one woman's struggle to change her life in order to achieve a sense-of-self and independent identity in the face of social and personal oppression. For Nora Helmer, this struggle is the first step on a courageous personal quest. For most of the play, Nora is trapped in the traditional position of a woman in society. She is defined by her role as wife and mother. But by the end of the play, Nora undergoes a personal transformation and sets out on a journey of self -discovery. In undertaking this journey, Nora is not only demanding her own independence, in a real sense, but she is also a pioneer, in a symbolic sense, in asserting the rights and dignity of all women in society to be treated as the equal of men."
| |
|
Nora Helmer and Antigone, 2004.
A comparative study of Nora from Henrik Ibsen's "A Doll's House" with Sophocles's "Antigone".
2,688 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 0 sources, £ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the relationship between men and women as a topic has been discussed and dissected ever since man has had enough leisure time to examine his life. It looks at how there are some women who follow men?s law and how there are others who follow the dictates of their own conscience; such is the predicament and the choice of the characters, Nora Helmer in "A Doll?s House" and Antigone in "Antigone". It shows how Nora and Antigone are women living in the world of men and how their laws and moral imperatives are gender-linked.
From the Paper
"Dramatists Szophokl?sz as well as Henrik Ibsen broke away from previously established theatrical traditions in their respective period. Sophocles revamped the structural aspects of his plays in contrast with other contemporary playwrights such as Aechylus and Euripid?sz. Ibsen departed from the melodramatic style which had been the accepted theater framework up to that time. Henrik Ibsen also began to expose realistic and themes of social and political nature, which became controversial issues among his contemporaries. Although some speak of Ibsen ?breaking new ground? when he designated Nora, a woman, as the protagonist and title character of A Doll?s House, Sophocles had done the precise same thing many centuries years before with Antigon?."
| |
|
Ibsen and Feminism: "A Doll's House", 2003.
An analysis of whether or not Ibsen intended "A Doll's House" to champion feminist agendas, with particular emphasis on the actions of Nora.
3,425 words (approx. 13.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
For years, literary critics have tried to reach some sort of conclusion on questions concerning the text and Ibsen's personal views: Was Ibsen a feminist? This paper attempts to examine whether "A Doll's House" is a work that supports feminist views and whether Ibsen intended Nora to be a campaigner for the feminist cause. It shows how, a closer inspection of both the play and Ibsen's preliminary notes about its construction reveal that Ibsen did not intend Nora to advocate women's rights. He intended her to be the catalyst for human betterment, a movement which he felt both men and women needed to participate in before any type of true union between the sexes was possible.
From the Paper
"The fact that Torvald, like Nora, is not allowed to break from his role either indicates that he is also a slave to the roles which society dictates, and that freedom for both sexes from these roles is tied up in the release of the opposite sex from their role (Baruch 34). Baruch points out that in this play, the home, traditionally believed to be a place where one is allowed to be oneself, is instead a training ground of sorts for both little boys and girls in which they learn their sexually dictated roles (33). Ibsen himself champions the need to liberate both women and men in Norwegian society in a letter written to Bjornstjerne Bjornson, "Norway is both free and independent enough; but a great deal needs to be done before we can say the same of Norwegian men and Norwegian women" (Sprinchorn 179). "
| |
|
Henrick Ibsen?s ?A Doll?s House?, 2004.
This paper discusses the relationship of husband and wife, Nora and Torvald, in Henrick Ibsen?s ?A Doll?s House?.
800 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, as Henrick Ibsen?s play, ?A Doll?s House?, progresses, the relationship between Nora and Torvald Helmer changes from that of a well-to-do husband and wife with cheerful children who seem to live the happy marriage life. The author points out that, towards the middle of the play, Nora seems to step away from her fantasy life, observing the fact that she is concerned about what her husband thinks of her. The paper relates that, during the third act, Nora finally opens her eyes to realize that her life with Torvald is over; and, as the play ends, she walks out of her "doll's house" into her new world of dependence, leaving Torvald to raise his three children on his own.
From the Paper
"In the beginning of the play, Nora is a doll in her husband?s eyes. She is a trophy he has won. He wants to keep his trophy pretty, pampered, and kept on a high pedestal. When he talks to his wife, he treats her like a little girl. He feels as if Nora should no nothing about their financial situation or any important issues in the household. It is a man?s job in life to take care of the family. Torvald adores his wife, but treats her like she is not on the same level as him. "Look, Nora, in lots of things, you're still a child. I'm older than you in many ways and I've had a little more experience" (Act 2, pg. 184). He has pet names for her such as skylark, squirrel and featherbrain."
| |
|
Nora as a Theorist, 2006.
An examination of Nora, a character in Henrik Ibsen's play, "A Doll's House", in light of the theories of Karl Marx and Max Weber.
5,809 words (approx. 23.2 pages), 11 sources, MLA, £ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper explains that Marx and Weber both had theories of alienation and authority. It shows that they both thought that men had been alienated from their natural selves. The paper explains that Marx thought it was because men had been subordinated by economics and technology and had given up their power to produce and that Weber believed that men became alienated from themselves when they formed organizations or bureaucracies. The writer discusses that Nora, the main character in "A Doll's House", is a sort of doll to her husband, Torvald. The writer explains that Nora loses her own sense of self as she subordinates herself to Torvald's authority in all things. The writer states that Nora is a theorist in the same way that Marx and Weber are because, when she realizes that she is alienated from herself and that she has an unresolved conflict because of this, she confronts her husband and leaves him, her children and her lifestyle. In conclusion, the writer posits that Nora would have made Karl Marx proud by her decision to leave everything she has ever known to start a new life without the conflict and alienation that she had become accustomed to.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Karl Marx' Theory of Alienation
Max Weber's Theory of Authority
Marx and Weber
"A Doll's House"
Analysis of Nora as a Theorist
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"The key part that Weber and Marx seem to agree on, though, is that there are people in authority in society, and people who are not in authority. This causes conflict and a sense of alienation for some people. While they vary in the reasons why this causes alienation, and they vary on why some men come to be in authority, they firmly agree on the problem. It is merely the solution and the cause of the problem where they diverge. The conflict and problems that they discuss can be seen in Henrik Ibsen's play "A Doll's House"."
| |
|
Freud and Ibsen, 2002.
An application of the theories of Freud to the character of Nora in the "The Dolls House" by Ibsen.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will show how Nora in "The Dolls House" by Ibsen, shows the characteristics of Freud's theory of Electra and the Id, as well as the theory of Repression that are so a part of the psychology in this play. By combining these ideas together a complete psychoanalysis of the main character Nora can be had for examination.
| |
|
Ibsen's "A Doll's House", 2001.
An analysis of the characters in the play, "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen, with a focus on the wife, Nora and her non-acceptance of reality.
750 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 0 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at Henrik Ibsen's play "The Doll's House" and how the theme of deception runs through it. The author shows how from the start the character of Nora seems too perfect-- perfect wife, perfect woman, but towards the end the truth emerges when Nora's true character is revealed.
From the Paper
"Nora is a sheltered housewife who is domineered by he husband, until circumstances force her to show her own independence. Nora was a perfect wife at the beginning of the play, but there were underlying deceptions beneath the perfection.
"From the start of the play, we realize that there was a general sense of falsehood in the Helmer house, brought on mostly by Nora's inability or unwillingness to accept the real world. Nora's desire to conceal the truth from Torvald and herself is further augmented by the patriarchal attitudes of Torvald towards her and her open acceptance and manipulation of such treatment in order to further suppress reality. Nora's departure, as well as being an escape from a house of lies is also an opportunity for personal growth and the means by which she discovers reality."
|
|
|
