| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "JOHN STUART MILL SUBJECTION WOMEN": |
|
|
John Stuart Mill's ?The Subjection of Women?, 2004.
This paper argues that John Stuart Mill's ?The Subjection of Women? is one of the most important catalysts of liberal feminism.
1,610 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 5 sources, APA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that, as a political commentary, Mill?s ?The Subjection of Women? is not a product of his time, but rather a critique of the restrictions on women?s political and civic rights; therefore, John Stuart Mill holds the distinction of being the first male philosopher to argue publicly in favor of women?s rights. The author points out that the book is an impassioned argument for the recognition of women's personal, legal, and political rights, including the right to work outside the home, the right to higher education, and the right to equal rights in the institution of marriage. The paper relates that, as a utilitarian, Mill believes that prohibiting the potential contributions from half the members of society went against the general good.
Table of Contents
Arguments of ?The Subjection of Women?
Social and Philosophical Context
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Most of the social theorists of the time, such as Edmund Burke and even Mill's own father James Mill argued that personal relationships, such as those between husbands and wives, were timeless and should be seen as "natural." In response to John Stuart's criticism, Burke harked back to the abstract reason of older philosophers like John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau and Jeremy Bentham. Bentham, in particular, was the father of utilitarianism, which John Stuart had adopted as his own personal philosophy."
| |
|
Subjection of Women by John stuart Mill, 2002.
Argues that society can achieve much of the equality for women that was advocated by John Stuart Mil.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 1 source, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The arguments about the female equality of John Stuart Mill stimulated controversy in his period before subsiding to an agreement that the theoretical statement about female equality contained elements for practical programme. The purpose of this essay is to show that Mill's argument about equality is achievable though some aspects of it are still debated in all societies.
| |
|
Mill's 'The Subjection of Women', 2006.
A review of the essay 'The Subjection of Women' by John Stuart Mill.
1,731 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 38.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses John Stuart Mill's essay, 'The Subjection of Women'. The paper reports how in this essay, Mill describes the status of women, highlights the prevalent inequalities and argues for a women's right to an equal position.
From the Paper
"The status of the women is not of a mere unequal person in respect to men, but that similar to a slave. And the problem is deeper as women are enslaved through manipulation. This is an attack to the norms of ethics and morality. Society uses the elements that render women fragile in order to manipulate them: "representing to them meekness, submissiveness, and resignation of all individual will into the hands of a man, as an essential part of sexual attractiveness" . As long as they are not educated in a free spirit, women remain trained to think that the only thing they can do in life is become wives and mothers. This is not only an attack against the condition of the women, but against the will and spirit of the human being. Furthermore, it is an act of attack upon the fundamental principle of freedom. "
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2004.
This paper discusses two works by John Stuart Mill: ?On Liberty? and
?The Subjection of Women?.
1,300 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Stuart Mill?s essay, ?On Liberty?, a criticism of the inequalities that existed during the Victorian era, is a very unique piece of literature in that it presents opportunities to view society and its norms in a different way. The author points out that the ideas from ?On Liberty? spilled over into the delicate area of how society treated women. This inspired another essay, ?The Subjection of Women?. The paper relates that, for Mill, freedom and individuality are necessary components of liberty, and many of the tenets of society actually were hostile to man in order to control or manage him.
From the Paper
"Mill also claims that many women, contrary to popular belief, do not accept willingly the way in which they were treated in his time. He points out that many women expressed objections to such treatment through their writing. They protested social conditions and many even petitioned Parliament for ?admission to the Parliamentary Suffrage? (1057). He states that custom ?ought not to create any prejudice, in favor of the arrangements which place women in social and political subjection to men? (1059). This was quite a statement considering that it was written at a time when women could not vote."
| |
|
John Stuart Mill: A Liberal Feminist, 2004.
This paper discusses John Stuart Mill's feminist views, specifically as expressed in his essay "Subjection of Women".
1,655 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that John Stuart Mill is often classified as a Liberal Feminist because of his "Subjection of Women", which explores the concepts of Liberal and Radical Feminism in relation to Mill's theory of utilitarian and his ideas about women's place in economic and societal terms. The author points out that Liberal Feminism is a branch of feminism, which uses the language of liberty, rights and legal equality, as opposed to the radical branch of second wave feminism who believed that the main tenet of feminism was the oppression of women by men. The paper states that most of Mill's writings are concerned with middle- or upper-class married women and he favours the traditional division of labour within the family; this incongruous coupling of patriarchy and capitalism by John Stuart Mill and the Liberal Feminists is criticised.
From the Paper
"John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was raised as a Utilitarian, influenced by Jeremy Bentham and his father, James Mill. His writings include On Liberty (1859), Utilitarianism (1863) and the Subjection of Women (1869), as well as many articles in various periodicals including the Utilitarian journal the Westminster Review. In 1851, after a long relationship he married Harriet Taylor, to whom he was apparently devoted, although her contribution to his work is disputed. To this Okin states: 'the difficult circumstances of their relationship must have increased the strength of his convictions, and of his determination to do what he could to have women's many disabilities remedied.' On her death in 1858 Mill was allegedly devastated: 'His despondency was frightful.'" His Utilitarian beginnings were at odds with his later liberal
| |
|
John Stuart Mill: On Liberty, 2002.
An overview of John Stuart Mill's views on democracy.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on "John Stuart Mill: on liberty". It includes what did John Stuart Mill saw on democracy, the serious threats to the development of individualism, what aspects of democracy worried him and were his fears justified.
| |
|
The First Amendment Violation vs. John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle?, 2002.
Describes a policy, adopted by Stanford Students, which restricts certain types of free speech and examines whether this policy conflicts with the first amendment or is a just application of John Stuart Mill's harm principle.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 2 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Stanford Students adopted a policy that made personally vilifying expressions an offense subject to penalties. The policy described outlawed expressions as "…words or non-verbal symbols…commonly understood to convey direct and visceral hatred or contempt for human beings on the basis of their sex, race, color, handicap, religion, or national or ethnic origin. This paper examines whether this policy should be ruled a violation of the First Amendment's right to free speech or whether it is a legitimate application of John Stuart Mill's harm principle.
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2006.
This paper discusses and analyzes chapter IV of philosopher John Stuart Mill's "On Liberty."
988 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The writer of this paper examines John Stuart Mill's philosophical views of individuals in society as well as the limits of authority in society and asks if these perceptions still exist today. This paper also explores the philosopher's 21 point dissertation on the subject as detailed in chapter IV of Mill's "On Liberty."
From the Paper
"Therefore in analyzing the strengths of Mill's statement he properly points out there is no codified law or regulations governing the individual's responsibilities to the society in which one lives there is none the less an implied obligation to the individual to behave in a manner that is acceptable to that society. Failure to do so, he states, also gives the society the right to censer in a manner acceptable to the society as a whole. In other words there are norms of behavior members of every group should recognize and live by in order to prevent prejudicial behavior toward any member of group of members."
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2002.
A study of the political ideals of John Stuart Mill.
1,255 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the profound political theory of John Stuart Mill, which created the foundation of democracy as we know it. It describes the society Mill had imagined. The author argues that the current society has made a mockery of individual rights and liberties, and states that the authorities must have more control over the individual.
From the Paper
"John Stuart Mill wrote that the individual?s rights and liberties should be recognized and respected by society, with only marginal control. While he acquiesced that the individual must return something for the benefits and protection he receives from society, society?s authority should be enforced when the individual violates the law or injures the rights of others. He was emphatic about the individuals? being allowed to extend himself as fully as possible and society?s restraining itself in the individuals? assertion of his personal choices. He derived his position on the fallibility of society and that nonconformist way would keep society on its toes to keep progressing and remaining alert."
| |
|
John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx, 2005.
This paper compares the views on freedom of John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay discusses John Stuart Mill's liberal views on individual freedom. The writer then compares these views to the views of Karl Marx on freedom and social class offered in the "Communist Manifesto." The writer concludes by addressing whether or not Marx' analysis is a valid counter to Mill's more liberal view of the concept.
From the Paper
"Both John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx were philosophers with a strong emphasis on individual freedom. Mill viewed freedom under a legitimate government concerned with the greatest good as necessary and possible. Mill argued in 'On Liberty' that individual freedom is and must be viewed as a sacrosanct quality and that there are few if any circumstances under which a state may rightfully interfere with individual freedom. Karl Marx also theorized about society's evolution toward true freedom believing society evolved toward freedom ... "
| |
|
John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle, 2006.
An analysis of the moral implications of John Stuart Mill's harm principle.
4,050 words (approx. 16.2 pages), 10 sources, £ 111.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how John Stuart Mill struggled with the same moral, philosophical, political, and social issues that have troubled previous theorists in many fields of study for thousands of years. His primary contributions to the debates about these issues were his books, 'Utilitarianism' and 'On Liberty', in which he formulated and defended principles which are still being debated today. His harm principle was a primary element of an attempt to provide a definitive moral framework for individuals and society, but it has implications that many people believe raises more questions than it resolves.
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2005.
This paper studies John Stuart Mill and the Limits of State Action.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 6 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the political theories of John Stuart Mill, specifically as they relate to his conceptions of the appropriate limitations on a nation-state's legitimate use of its power. In the course of this discussion, the writer raises Mill's points about the principle of harm and the principle of liberty and shows how these two principles are fundamental to our understanding of the extent to which states should be allowed to act.
From the Paper
"Born in 1806 in London, most of John Stuart Mill's political and philosophical work was composed in the early part of the nineteenth century. He is currently recognized as one of the primary voices of both the classical liberal and the utilitarian philosophical positions (Johnson, 1999). This dual position underscores one of the primary tensions in Mill's works, which spread across a wide range of topics including politics, economics, religion and even nutrition. However, for the purpose of this study, I will be focusing primarily on only one of Mill's texts that relates to political science, "On Liberty.""
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2004.
An analysis of John Stuart Mill's opinion on capital punishment.
854 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses John Stuart Mill's disagreement with the laxity of the justice system of his time. His utilitarian outlook on capital punishment is examined. The paper explains that Mill staunchly objected to the extreme caution with which the justice system of his time imposed the death penalty on incorrigible criminals and the system's view of death as the worst evil, as opposed to life imprisonment.
From the Paper
"He suggested that death was not as terrible as imagined by the judges and justices of his time, whom he described as effeminate and inefficacious in their responsibility. "For what else than effeminacy is it to be so much more shocked by taking a man's life than by deriving him of all that makes life desirable or valuable? (Hinman)." JS Mill, instead, proposed that genuine human education despised death as something inevitable and something to be held but ready to be risked for a worthy cause. While he agreed that death was among the greatest evils, human feelings counted more than human life and the avoidance of death. He wrote that "to deter by suffering from inflicting suffering is not only possible, but the very purpose of penal justice" in emphasizing that an individual who unjustly takes the life of another necessarily forfeits his own. The utilitarian thinker would see only quality life, not mere existence, as worth living. The criminal neither considers the victim's right to quality life nor does the criminal live it. Mill perceived criminality as directly opposed to the well-being of every member of society and society's survival itself. Any convincing utilitarian argument cannot get too far from his arguments."
| |
|
John Stuart Mill, 2002.
This paper is a biography of English philosopher John Stuart Mill .
2,150 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 8 sources, £ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the highlights of John Stuart Mill's life. The paper examines his many books and essays. The author compares and contrasts the philosophy he presented in those works with contemporary and present day philosophical thought.
|
|
|
