| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "HURRICANE KATRINA CLASS RACE": |
|
|
Hurricane Katrina, Class and Race, 2007.
This paper discusses Hurricane Katrina and looks at the related social aspects of class and race.
1,905 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this essay, the writer notes that the Hurricane Katrina disaster will be discussed and debated for years, perhaps for a hundred years and more; and it can safely be assumed that an important part of the discussion will embrace the concepts of race and class. The writer maintains that one can easily imagine a sociology professor in the year 2025 pointing out that had a storm of such colossal intensity been approaching a city of mostly white, middle class and wealthy citizens, a different set of preparations and a wholly different outcome could be expected. This paper reviews and analyzes the social realities of New Orleans before and after Katrina's wrath, from several perspectives, including the theories of Karl Marx.
Outline:
Karl Marx
Katrina
From the Paper
"When considering the fact that the Army Corps of Engineers reported years ago that the levees around New Orleans - much of which is below sea level - were not structurally safe, one has to also consider the class issues within the political structure of the United States; in other words, is New Orleans a place that would have a high priority in the ruling class of Washington D.C.? The answer is no. And so, the Army Corps of Engineers would be (and was) more committed to working on the Florida Everglades' multi-billion dollar project (the president's brother being the governor of Florida) than retrofitting the levees in a city that traditionally votes Democratic, and is largely African American. These points are raised because Marx doesn't specifically talk a lot about "race" per se, but he does make it clear that class struggles have to do with issues that in the case of New Orleans, are largely ethnic."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina and Race, 2008.
An analysis of the evidence of white privilege and racism in the United States in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.
6,439 words (approx. 25.8 pages), 23 sources, MLA, £ 102.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the phenomenon of white privilege in the United States. It describes how it was never more apparent than in the calamity of Hurricane Katrina. The paper discusses the effects of this privilege and racism and describes the ways that it became evident following the national disaster of Hurricane Katrina. The paper questions whether any changes will occur to rectify the problems.
From the Paper
"The effect of White Privilege is the creation of system justifications (Napier 61), and it was never more apparent than in the calamity of Katrina. The effect of this was the construction of victim blaming justifications by the authorities in charge when combating the disparity in response to the needs of those of color. The system appeared to come out smelling like roses; it was only certain individuals that could be blamed for any prejudicial treatment. And the victims were blamed for not being able to help themselves. Ludicrous in concept yet if repeated often enough it become reality to those involved. Katrina has certainly taught us that the systems of government, business and education need to recognize this invisible white privilege within and deal with the racial prejudiced involved with it. Will there be changes? Unfortunately we still seem to be waiting for that promised, "bold action." (Bush 1406)"
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina and the U.S. Economy, 2006.
This article studies the U.S. economy and discusses the effects of Hurricane Katrina.
2,087 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discusses and analyzes the topic of the U.S. economy. Specifically, it discusses what effect Hurricane Katrina has had on the U.S. economy so far, and what may be some of the implications for the future. Hurricane Katrina's full effect on the United States' economy may take years to fully develop and understand. Katrina's effect may even be felt worldwide by the time all the affects are analyzed and tallied up. The immediate costs are quite simple to see - skyrocketing fuel costs instantaneously after the hurricane hit, lost jobs and billions of dollars in aid. However, there are other long-term costs in human life, inflation and rising interest rates that can only play out over time. The writer claims that the U.S. economy is going to suffer from the affects of hurricane Katrina and that it just remains to be seen just how much it will suffer.
From the Paper
"The Katrina crisis may also affect the nationwide auto industry. With fuel costs so high, many people are looking for alternatives to low gas mileage vehicles. There has been a lot more public interest in more fuel-efficient vehicles, such as hybrids, which use a combination of gas and electric-powered engines to run more efficiently and save fuel. Already, many auto manufacturers are beginning to advertise their more fuel-efficient models to bring consumers back into auto showrooms. For years, most Americans have been more concerned with large, high-power, low-mileage vehicles with little regard to fuel economy. This energy crisis may finally create the need for more low-cost, high-efficiency vehicles, and force Detroit automakers to find new technologies to help conserve fuel."
|
| Essay # 96442 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Hurricane Katrina, 2005.
This paper puts forward the argument that the federal government is to blame for the delays in rescue and relief following hurricane Katrina.
1,546 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 11 sources, MLA, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents both sides of the hurricane Katrina debate. It then provides a plethora of evidence to suggest that the federal government (rather than state and local government) is responsible for the delays in rescue and relief following hurricane Katrina. It cites the mistakes of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, FEMA and FEMA director Michael Brown and the President of the United States.
From the Paper
"There is evidence to suggest that the federal government understood the serious threat hurricane Katrina posed on the low-lying Gulf region, and that they did make some effort to convey this danger and urge people out of harm's way. On Saturday August, 27th, President Bush declared a state of emergency in Louisiana and encouraged people to evacuate the New Orleans area before the storm made landfall. Prior to the storm, flood and storm surge predictions were made by the National Hurricane Center in Miami. At least 200 buses were sent to aid in evacuations before the event. The federal government did express concerns over the levee system's ability to weather the storm and operate under such difficult conditions."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina, 2007.
An overview of the government relief initiative after Hurricane Katrina.
808 words (approx. 3.2 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how Hurricane Katrina was the most financially devastating and deadliest hurricane in the history of the United States. In particular, it looks at how the nature of this natural disaster brought about one of the most complex and controversial disaster relief efforts in history and how the government spent billions in relief and organizations from local, state, and federal levels worked in unison with NGOs to attempt the recovery and help of Katrina victims.
From the Paper
"Katrina victims can be loosely defined as any individual who suffered physical, financial and emotional harm from direct, storm related causes. Katrina victims range far and wide, although the majority of the focus are upon those in New Orleans, many victims also were evacuated from South Florida and Mississippi. The victims of Katrina receive strong attention on the national level for several reasons, one of the primary reasons being the disparity between racial dynamics in those victimized by the storm. The majority of victims appear to be poor minorities, especially those residing within inner city New Orleans. The racial disparity among Katrina victims was strongly noted by media commentators within the Superdome. "
| |
|
The Hurricane Katrina Disaster, 2008.
An in-depth look at the hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans.
2,839 words (approx. 11.4 pages), 12 sources, MLA, £ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the factors that could have caused hurricane Katrina and discusses if Katrina was predictable and the likelihood that New Orleans will be hit again. The paper examines this region in comparison to others that have a history of hurricanes and looks at whether the city should be rebuilt on its old location. The paper then discusses the measures that will make New Orleans safer if it is indeed rebuilt.
Outline:
Introduction: Predicting Disaster
Should New Orleans Be rebuilt?
The Extent of Destruction and Future Guidelines
From the Paper
"Past civilizations have always been under the threat of some form of natural disaster. For some we only know of them because of a particular disaster that swallowed up and preserved them, such as the well-known Pompei example in ancient Italy. But in modern times we have the good fortune of knowing a lot more about what causes certain natural disasters, and to this extent we can help prepare certain regions for what inevitably will come their way. Figuring out all the geographical relations that determine a particular region becomes very important, and many areas of science must mesh to convey the full information, statistical or otherwise, of what causes severe weather systems, and to what degree is the pattern predictable. Currently there is increasing concern surrounding the hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans, and in general how we can prepare for an increase in tropical storms in this and other critical regions."
| |
|
The Impact of FEMA on Hurricane Katrina's Aftermath, 2006.
An examination of the faults of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) following Hurricane Katrina.
1,780 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 9 sources, APA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the failures of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), as witnessed by Americans in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The article lists a timeline of events following the hurricane, as well as enumerates the errors made by FEMA and its results for the people of New Orleans.
From the Paper
"Chicago was not the only city to offer help and be declined . In the days following the hurricane, several local and state governments, corporations and nonprofit organizations across the United States offered to help in the relief effort, only to be declined by federal officials, who actually provided very little aid to the needy victims of the hurricane. Claiming security concerns, the Department of Homeland Security prevented the American Red Cross from entering New Orleans with food and supplies. Five hundred Floridian airboaters were prepared to rescue stranded victims, but FEMA turned them down. Many other cities and groups also had their offers refused."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina, 2005.
An assessment of selected issue fronts concerning Hurricane Katrina, focusing on human and environmental issues.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 15 sources, APA, £ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper presents an assessment of selected issue fronts concerning Hurricane Katrina, focusing on human and environmental issues. The paper discusses the ineffective response of government agencies, notably Homeland Security and FEMA. It also highlights the physical facts of a hurricane.
From the Paper
"When Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in August and September the response of government agencies was ineffective and became politically controversial . The winds of the Category storm did great damage and the city's flood-control and energy ..."
|
| Essay # 71708 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
The Children of Hurricane Katrina, 2005.
A discussion regarding the effects on Hurricane Katrina on children and youth.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 2 sources, £ 17.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the traumatic emotional effects that Hurricane Katrina had on children, both those caught in the hurricane and those evacuated earlier. According to a review in this paper of an article by Dr. Bruce Perry, the leading US authority on dealing with childhood trauma, the urgency of caring for the emotional well being of these children is imperative.
From the Paper
"According to Dr. Bruce Perry, a senior fellow at the Child Trauma Academy in Houston, TX and America's foremost authority on childhood trauma and neglect, "more than 35% of the children exposed to a single traumatic event will develop serious mental health problems" (Renowned Child Trauma Expert, 2005). Perry continues to state that the real crisis of Hurricane Katrina is the millions of traumatized children. This article appeared in newspapers across the country. It was written and carried across the US Newswire service. Dr. Perry's Child Trauma Academy (Renowned Child Trauma Expert, 2005) was reported to be offering various publications to help other professionals support what he calls "The Children of Katrina."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina and George W. Bush's Ratings, 2006.
A reflection of Hurricane Katrina on George W. Bush's public relations ratings.
8,421 words (approx. 33.7 pages), 18 sources, APA, £ 122.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the implications of public relations regarding the Katrina disaster for President George W. Bush and the Republican Party.
This is in light of the fact that the public approval of the president's handling of his job and personal favorability ratings have declined to low levels among American voters. The Bush administration's decisions on the War in Iraq are increasingly unpopular among voters, with low approval rates of the president's handling of the war and deep doubts about the value of the war in relation to costs. The president's ratings have sharply declined as a result of the president's handling of Hurricane Katrina. The paper concludes that voters are increasingly dissatisfied with Bush's presidency. It is therefore clear that the Bush administration will have to work long and hard to come up with new ideas for improving the president's image or face an unsuccessful second term.
Table of Contents
Abstract
Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Methodology and Data Collection
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
References
Appendices
From the Paper
"In recent months, much of America's attention has been focused upon the tragedies associated with Hurricane Katrina's damage to Louisiana. Among the issues associated with the aftermath has been the performance of President George W. Bush and the federal government in responding to the catastrophe. Many national polls (Silverman, 2005, CBS News, 2005) have shown significant dissatisfaction with Bush's handling of the hurricane's damage."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina, 2005.
An evaluation of Michael Eric Dyson's "Come Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster".
877 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a critical review of Dyson's thesis on Hurricane Katrina. The author, whilst supporting the thesis, claims that Dyson points only to problems exposed by Katrina, offering little in the way of constructive action to work on America's prevailing racial and social inequities. The paper suggests that one could attempt to see this tragedy as an opportunity to increase racial awareness and highlight the various injustices that continue to surround society.
From the Paper
"While I agree almost entirely with Michael Eric Dyson's overall theory on the racial politics of the Hurricane Katrina aftermath as outlined in his book Come Hell or High Water: Hurricane Katrina and the Color of Disaster, along with my general agreement I find significant weaknesses within his arguments with which I would challenge Dyson. I have no objection to the claim that this tragic disaster served to expose the racial and socioeconomic inequities that continue to prevail today both in our society and the application of our government. Dyson certainly provides evidence to demonstrate that the areas hit hardest by Hurricane Katrina were some of the poorest in the nation, encompassing a highly disproportionate number of African-Americans."
| |
|
Hurricane Katrina, 2007.
This paper discusses the White House's unsatisfactory response to the hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
1,276 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper describes how Hurricane Katrina swept full-force through New Orleans during the latter part of 2005 and the city was tragically unprepared. The paper explains that this lack of preparation can be blamed on a variety of factors, but what has been most publicized is the slow response of the White House to the disaster. The paper demonstrates how President Bush appeared to have been oblivious to the nature of the crisis involved. The paper maintains that the government is more concerned with protecting its public image than with the actual alleviation of human suffering. The paper concludes that Katrina has taught some terrible lessons that will only carry weight if the government takes responsibility.
From the Paper
"What is interesting about the ensuing debate regarding the government's attempts to remedy this discrepancy is that the most hotly contested issues are raging between the Republicans and the Democrats. The issue has therefore become a purely political one, rather than a social or infrastructure one. It appears that the issue of how to avert the mistakes in the future seems to have been clouded by political parties attempting to demonize each other for their failure to respond adequately to the disaster."
|
|
|
