| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "HUMANISTIC TRANSPERSONAL PSYCHOLOGIES": |
|
|
Humanistic and Transpersonal Psychologies, 2007.
A comparison of existential-humanistic psychology with transpersonal psychology.
1,163 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 8 sources, APA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the roots and goals of existential-humanistic psychology and transpersonal psychology. The author describes why the theories are fundamentally different, by illustrating the basic principles of each outlook. The historic roots of each theory are described. The author concludes that a belief that people are afraid of non-existence in existential psychology contrasts with the goals that transpersonal psychologies seek in their states of "collective unconscious" or deep meditation, where one transcends the earthly, human body and moves into a state of uniting with the entire universe.
From the Paper
"The Transpersonal Psychologies find their similarities in their approach to the body-mind relationships and transformation. Essentially they believe that the mind controls the body and if you can put your mind at peace, the body will respond. Based on the work of Carl Jung, who first coined the term "transpersonal" (uberpersonlich) in the phrase "transpersonal unconscious" which he used as a synonym for his well-known "collective unconscious," it refers to the human condition as essentially healthy and full of potential, not as ill and diseased (Schneider,2004)."
| |
|
Transpersonal Psychologies, 2004.
This paper discusses transpersonal psychologies and briefly reviews the "The Center of the Cyclone" by J. C. Lilly.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 14 sources, £ 82.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, transpersonal psychologies are examined. The writer looks at the key concept and interests of transpersonal psychologies and their varieties. The writer also discusses the central concept of self-transcendence. In this paper, the writer incorporates a brief discussion of "The Center of the Cyclone" by J.C.Lilly.
From the Paper
"According to Davis, transpersonal psychology represents an integration of certain psychological concepts, theories and methods with an emphasis upon spiritual disciplines. As Davis puts it, the key concept and interests of transpersonal psychology include spiritual experiences, mystical states of consciousness mindfulness and meditative practices, shamanic states ritual, the overlap of spiritual experiences and disturbed states, such as psychosis and depression and the transpersonal dimensions of relationships service and encounters with the natural world. The central concept in Transpersonal Psychology is self transcendence ... "
| |
|
Humanistic and Interactionist Theories of Psychology, 2005.
This paper discusses the humanistic and interactionist theories of psychology, which were developed because of disappointment in the behaviorism and psychoanalysis theories.
3,190 words (approx. 12.8 pages), 31 sources, APA, £ 63.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the humanistic personality researchers wanted to emphasize human tendencies toward self-improvement, self- actualization, autonomy and looking at the overall value of human beings; whereas, the interactionists, or trait situation interaction therapists, were more concerned with the combined dynamic influences of both personality traits and situations in order to acquire a gestalt understanding. The author points out that Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers are major contributors to humanistic psychology; Walter Mischel, Henry Murray (theory of needs) and Harry Sullivan (social interactions) are associated with trait situation interaction. The paper relates that one of the differences between humanistic psychology and trait situation interaction is how much of an emphasis to place on an individual's personality; the link between traits and situations has been more precisely specified in the interactionist approach; however, most humanistic psychologists apply an ideographic approach that looks at the entire individual and in context.
From the Paper
"One of the main aspects of PSC is expressing empathy, which is based on Rogers' humanistic approach. Expressing empathy toward pain, anxiety, or anger does not mean reinforcing the way the child has handled a given problem, but helps the youth be less defensive and more ready to reevaluate his/her actions and approach change. Unlike punishment that addresses the feelings and needs (id) of the child or moralization that addresses the conscience (super ego), PSC addresses the ego. It encourages children to understand the event, be aware of their feelings, reevaluate their actions, examine the alternatives, make new decisions, construct a plan of action, and finally implement that plan. PSC aims to accomplish behavioral change and ease the personal growth of children."
| |
|
Current Manifestations of Humanistic Psychology, 2006.
This well-researched paper focuses on the latest theories, methods and philosophies relating to the fields of both humanistic psychology and psychotherapy.
3,399 words (approx. 13.6 pages), 29 sources, MLA, £ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the birth of humanistic psychology which was developed in protest against the curtailment of psychoanalysis and behaviorist therapies which primarily viewed the human being as a collection of unconscious impulses or reactors to stimuli. This paper details the views and opinions of numerous experts in the field who contend that humanistic psychology and psychotherapy must be seen as an interpersonal and moral phenomenon which requires significant insight. This in-depth paper focuses primarily on three specific categories of humanistic psychology. One category this paper delves into discusses the self-actualization form of therapy which is concerned with helping individuals discover who they really are while focusing on their potential for self-improvement. This paper also delves into various existential theories and treatments which are currently being used by a large number of humanistic psychotherapists who find these particular forms of treatment to be effective.
From the Paper
"Humanistic psychology developed in protest against the reductionism of psychoanalysis and behaviorism which saw the human being as a bunch of unconscious impulses or reactors to stimuli. The new paradigm sought to treat the "whole person" and found phenomenological/ qualitative approaches better suited to this richer purpose. Maslow, for example, wanted to gain information based on personal, subjective experiences and not on abstract systems. But as Giorgi (2005) points out, the natural science/quantitative influence is still here. He admits that humanistic psychology has been granted a presence in psychology, but shows it is still in the minority. Of the 150,000 APA members, only 610 are members of Division 32, or less than 1/2 of 1%. The bulk of the field of psychology still honors the scientific approach more than the humanistic approach. Humanism is not as strong as psychoanalysis or behaviorism in universities and not as well represented as cognitive psychology."
| |
|
Humanistic Psychology, 2007.
An overview of the history and evolution of humanistic psychology and its offshoots.
1,587 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 11 sources, MLA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes the approach of humanistic psychology in the treatment of mental health. It describes the role of humanist therapists (also known as transpersonalists, Gestalt therapists, psycho-physiologists, integral psychologists, mind/body practitioners, postmodernists and human scientists). The paper also describes the history of humanistic psychology and how it has evolved with time and discusses the offshoots that fall under the humanist approach.
From the Paper
"In the 1970s and 80s, the ideas and values of humanistic psychology spread into many areas of society. In addition to the above noted areas, there is also green politics, deep ecology, the feminist and gay rights movements, and the psycho-spiritual wing of the peace movement. This takes into account an integrated and balanced view of human nature and maintaining harmony in the grand scheme of existence. As noted by Maureen O'Hara, past president of the Association for Humanistic Psychologists: "As the world's people demand freedom and self-determination, it is urgent that we learn how diverse communities of empowered individuals, with freedom to construct their own stories and identities, might live together in mutual peace. Perhaps it is not a vain hope that is life in such communities might lead to the advance in human consciousness beyond anything we have yet experienced. ""
| |
|
Humanistic Psychology, 2004.
This paper discusses humanistic psychology and compares it to psychoanalysis and behaviorism.
1,485 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 6 sources, APA, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that humanistic psychology created a third method of understanding humans as living beings who are basically good and attempts to identify the importance of their subjective process rather than create arbitrary theoretical systems to describe human behavior. The author points out that humanistic psychology grew out of a large body of work being done by many psychologists; whereas, psychoanalysis, the foundation of modern psychology, was created by Freud and then extended by Jung, while behaviorism was developed by scientists like B.F. Skinner. The paper states that the aim of humanistic psychology is what is known as ?self-actualization?, or the reaching for the knowledge of the deepest and most hidden parts of ourselves that we desire to bring out and turn into a reality.
From the Paper
"Thus, the major break between humanistic psychology and the previous schools is its tendency to place an essential importance on the subjective character of psychology. Humanistic psychology sees this subjective experience as the most important factor in understanding the entire human being. Moreover, instead of attempting to atomize experience and understand it in the sense of particular behaviors or disorders, humanistic psychology favors a holistic approach that values the whole of the human being, seeing the mind in the body as related parts of a continuum that affect and are affected by each other in a continuous feedback loop."
| |
|
Humanistic Psychology, 2004.
An explanation of the concept behind humanistic psychology and a look at some of its more famous proponents.
1,283 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains how humanistic psychology, an approach to psychology focusing on self-realization and actualization, suggests that individuals have an innate tendency to seek out self-fulfillment and meaning in their lives, but the ability to find a meaningful existence can be impacted by the individual?s environment. The paper then explores these ideas and how they relate to the author's own insights and individualization. The theories and ideas of several famous proponents of humanistic psychology are discussed as well.
From the Paper
"Carl Rogers is a leading proponent of humanistic psychology. His ideas and theories represent a principal component of humanistic psychology. Humanistic psychology developed during the 1950 and 1960s within the United States; its focus is client centered or person centered approaches to therapy (Cummins, 1996: 108). Carl Rogers help promote the ideal of self realization which is critical to this theory. Rogers published several books that promoted the idea of growth. Rogers postulated that ?the individual has a sufficient capacity to deal constructively with all those aspects of his life which can potentially come into conscious awareness? (Cummins, 1996:108). This ability is derived from internal investigations."
| |
|
The Humanistic Period, 2007.
An overview of the humanistic period in the study of philosophy.
1,946 words (approx. 7.8 pages), 7 sources, APA, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the nature and history of the Humanistic period. Major emphasis is placed on the understanding of the term, its evolution, history and developments, placing more emphasis on modern updates and contributions to humanism, as well as theories of humanistic behaviors. The author also explains how the contributions from the past make it a viable theory that is utilized today.
From the Paper
"In order to better explore the humanistic period, it is necessary to clearly define humanism. Humanism, is broadly defined as a category of ethical philosophies that affirm the worth and dignity of humanity, i.e. all people, because of their ability to easily determine the right or wrong as based on the appeals to universal human qualities such as logic, rationality and reason. Humanism is a very broad definition of different smaller schools of thought that make up that philosophy of thought. Humanism rejects transcendental thoughts and beliefs and does not support belief without reason, supernatural, deities or divine revelations."
| |
|
Humanistic and Eclectic Therapies, 2002.
An analysis of the humanistic and eclectic schools of therapy.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and analyzes the Humanistic and Eclectic schools of therapy, discusses Carl Rogers, and includes descriptions of the theories and techniques that can be applied with these approaches.
|
| Essay # 101565 |
temporarily unavailable
|
|
|
|
Humanistic Theorists Compared, 2002.
A comparison of the theories of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 10 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This ten-page paper discusses and compares the two humanistic ideals of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Following the ideals and notions of Maslow's pyramid of needs and Rogers continuance along similar lines.
| |
|
Humanistic Martha, 2002.
A character sketch of Martha from Edward Albee's "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf", presented in a unique way.
1,654 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a case summary of the fictional character of Martha from Edward Albee's award-winning 1962 play "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf." The paper is presented from the point of view of the therapist, a practitioner of humanistic psychology.
From the Paper
"As described by Albee, Martha is a large, boisterous woman of 52, looking somewhat younger. She is ample, but not fleshy. Albee (1963) calls Martha an amply-endowed earth-mother with only her husband to oversee, a man she refers to as "the shadow of a man flickering around the edges of a house" (p. 226). Martha's background offers insight into her present emotional state and behavior. She has a loud and abrasive attitude. Martha is loud and aggressive, and does everything possible to make herself noticed. She is abusive most of the time but that is because she is afraid of being ignored. Her mother died when she was very young, and she was raised by her father."
| |
|
Behaviorist & Humanistic Approaches, 1988.
This paper focuses on learning, training & development and compares theories, techniques and principles.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
" This paper will describe the variables which behaviorists and humanistic theorists have investigated within the field of training and development. The field of training and development has experienced a shift or emphasis from a behavioristic approach to a humanistic approach. This shift has not been to the exclusion of the other but a redefined of the variables of interest in research, instructional design, and theoretical activities. Wittrock and Lumsdaine (1977) and Laird and House (1984) have outlined some of the factors which have contributed to this shift and have defined the contributions of each of these orientations to the field of training psychology. These authors warn that the shift in emphasis has been misunderstood as a(...)"
| |
|
Hobbes' and Machiavelli's Humanist Governing Principles, 2008.
This paper compares and contrasts humanistic governing principles in "The Prince" by Niccolo Machiavelli and "The Leviathan" by Thomas Hobbes.
2,263 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how Machiavelli and Hobbes analyze the dictates of governing institutions, religion and ethics. The paper shows how these two philosophers often agree, but differ on varying principles of practicality for humanistic governing bodies. The paper shows the complexity of rational thought that exists between Hobbes and Machiavelli and explains how the nature of ethics becomes a dynamic that divides them.
From the Paper
"The manner of politics that one can see in The Prince by Machiavelli reveals much about the cruel, and often-lawless manner of governing that seeks to suppress the people being ruled by their leaders. He makes little argument for unrealistic manners of ethical guidance that might smooth over these forceful behaviors of the leading class. By these means he tells us much about how rules matter little in the quest for power and dominance over the lesser classes. In starting, Machiavelli refused to be deflected by utopian dreams or romantic hopes and by questions of right and wrong or good and bad in government. This is how Hobbes and Machiavelli compare, since they both seek realism in their quest to discover the best and most efficient way to rule."
|
|
|
