| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "HITLER MISTAKES": |
|
|
Hitler's Mistakes, 2007.
This paper discusses how Hitler's mistakes led to his demise.
885 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that as a wartime leader Hitler did things right at the beginning, but made major mistakes later on that led to the destruction of his nation. The writer then looks at some of Hitler's military considerations and calculations. The writer looks at Hitler's greatest errors and miscalculations, making use of different relevant works of literature. The writer maintains that Hitler's greatest error, besides underestimating the ability of the Allies to beat him back, was probably the invasion of Russia.
From the Paper
"During the years between 1933 and 1938, Hitler just wanted to build up his arms while he was cutting deals to revise the Versailles agreement and keeping the Allies from pinning him down. His diplomatic strategy at that time was that he didn't want to rattle too many cages or cause too much concern among the New Conservatives in Germany, at first, so he kept to the anti-Bolshevism theme which old-time leaders in Germany agreed with; that is, Germany will take over the Soviet Union one day. Also, France was an enemy of Germany, and the old-liners agreed with Hitler that "reconciliation" with France would never be possible."
"The Germans had tried since 1918 to maintain good relationships with England, but Hitler "despised British democracy"; the United States didn't enter into Germany's immediate plans, but Hitler thought the U.S. was being dominated by "Jews and blacks." Hitler believed Italy was a natural ally, and he was right, Orlow wrote."
| |
|
Mistakes in Contracts, 2005.
An examination of the implications of mistakes and misrepresentations in legal contracts.
1,524 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Generally speaking, a contract is an agreement that is enforceable through the courts. Clearly, in order for all of the parties to any given contract to achieve the desired goals of the agreement, everyone involved must be informed of the circumstances and facts surrounding the agreement. It is important to capture all of the elements required for its execution when crafting the instrument. People - even lawyers - are only human, though, and intentional and unintentional mistakes and misrepresentations are sometimes made in contracts that can have profound implications for all of the parties involved. To gain a better understanding of what these implications might be, this paper provides an overview of contract law, and what the authorities have to say about contracts containing mistakes and misrepresentations. A summary of the research is provided in the conclusion.
Outline
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Background and Overview
Mistakes and Misrepresentations in Contracts
Elements Required for a Contract to be Valid
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"The research showed that contracts are a special type of agreement between two or more parties that is enforceable in court. In order for a contract to be enforceable, though, the three key elements of consideration, capacity, and legality must be satisfied. To meet the legality element of this formula, a contract must be free of misrepresentations; however, mistakes can and are made all of the time in contracts and these can be remedied if all of the parties agree to it. In many cases, though, courts will enforce contracts even if they contain mistakes if the contract was made in good faith and satisfies the other requisite elements. Misrepresentations, though, generally represents a death blow to any contract if it is determined that one or more parties intentionally misled the other party or parties, and mistakes based on such misrepresentations will not be a legitimate defense for this misrepresenting party or parties."
| |
|
Hitler and Democracy, 2004.
An analysis of Adolf Hitler's notion about the philosophy of democracy.
2,476 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 17 sources, MLA, £ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how and what Adolf Hitler may have considered to be a concept of democracy. It looks at how democracy and Hitler crossed paths on numerous occasions and reviews a number of Hitler?s known ideas and public utterances and provides some speculation and interpretation regarding Hitler?s opinions about the democratic philosophy. It also attempts to show how Adolf Hitler manipulated the democratic process because of how he understood the concept; in order for him to attain true power, the German people needed to elect him into office.
Outline
Introduction
Democracy
Hitler, the Checks and Balance System of Democracy
Hitler and the Competition of Ideas Essential for Democracy
Hitler and the Freedom of Expression
Hitler and the Freedom of Religion
Hitler and Exercise of Power Through Elected Representatives and the Right to Vote
Hitler and Economical System of the Democratic Style of Government (Capitalism)
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Adolf Hitler was obviously not a pious man. ?The Old Testament conceived of as a volume written to expound the nationalistic philosophy of the Jewish race is now a favorite item on the Nazi cultural menu. Rosenberg writes in Mythus des 20n Jahrhunderts (Myth of the 20th Century): 'As a book of religion, the Old Testament must be done away with once and for all. That will end the unsuccessful attempt of 1500 years to turn us mentally into Jews.? (Hitler) In the sense that freedom of religion is an essential part of a democratic way of life, Adolf Hitler was totally against several religions other than Judaism. But because his position was strong against the Jews, all of democracy was wrong because of the concept associated with a freedom of religion."
| |
|
"Hitler and Nazism", 2002.
An analysis of Hitler's intentions and regime in "Hitler and Nazism" by Enzo Callotti.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 1 source, £ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss the book by Enzo Callotti entitled "Hitler and Nazism" and describe the author's aim in telling his perspective on Hitler and the Third Reich. From differing angles, the purpose of this paper will be to describe what Hitler's intentions were and the way that his regime functioned during the Second World War in Colletti's historical opinion. By analyzing his perspectives about Hitler, his purpose as a historian can be better defined within annals of history and in the opinions of the author.
| |
|
Comparing Machiavelli to Hitler, 2002.
This paper discusses how Machiavelli would have evaluated the leadership qualities of Adolph Hitler and what, if anything, he would have criticized, endorsed, or refined about Hitler?s leadership.
2,226 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The following paper summarizes Machiavelli's theory of politics, what Machiavelli's thoughts might have been on being compared to Hitler and whether or not the writer agrees with Machiavelli's assessment of Hitler?s leadership and politics. In addition, the writer looks at how Machiavelli may have advised Hitler on his leadership skills.
From the Paper
?Machiavelli would say Hitler certainly appeared to possess these qualities that is why a large percentage of the German people supported his Nazi regime. As far as attempting to do good Hitler believed that what he was doing, by exterminating the Jews and other so-called lower races, was good and moreover that the German race was superior. According to his writings in Mein Kampf, Germany was ?the mother of all life? (Hitler,459). According to an Encarta article,? he hoped to conquer the entire world, and for a point in time his Nazi regime dominated most of Europe and much of North Africa. He instituted sterilization and euthanasia measures to enforce his idea of racial purity among German people and caused the slaughter of millions of Jews, Sinti and Roma (Gypsies), Slavic peoples, and many others, all of whom he considered inferior.?
| |
|
Adolf Hitler, 2002.
This paper looks at the life of Adolf Hitler, from early childhood to his ascension to the head of Germany. The essay discusses the contending ideologies present in Germany, and the methods used by Hitler to combat these ideas.
1,420 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 9 sources, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a brief look at the life of Adolf Hitler, from his early family years until his suicide in 1945. The author discusses Hitler's influences and political ideologies as he rose to become the leader of the Nazi Party and then Nazi Germany. The paper also discusses Hitler's "Final Solution", his plans to rid the world of "inferior" races and preserve an Aryan society.
From the Paper
"Adolf Hitler was born on April 20th 1889 in Braunau-am-Inn, located in Austria . He was the fourth child of Klara and Alois Hitler. Hitler?s childhood was rather stress-free, as his father had worked his way up considerably through the Austrian customs service. He worked as a customs guard near the Austrian-German border. Hitler began his schooling in 1900, at the age of 11, and his grades were above average. It was after his first years of schooling that Hitler and his father began to disagree about his future. Hitler wanted to attend Realschule, a secondary school that would prepare him for further study and place an emphasis on modern languages and technical subjects. However, his father preferred that he enter the civil service."
| |
|
The Hitler Youth, 2003.
An analysis of the atttraction of the Hitler Youth to so many young Germans.
1,746 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In the 1920's Hitler created a youth movement that would spearhead a new generation of superior Germans. He named it the Hitler Jugend or Hitler Youth. The paper looks at the circumstances in which the Hitler Youth was introduced and why it was so popular with German youths. It discusses the purpose of the movement including the activities it involved.
From the Paper
"By 1933 Hitler's dream of the Hitler Youth being a staging point for a new Germany was set back when he found out that only but 100 thousand members were part of it. Hitler was not swayed by this, and in 1934 when he came to complete power, he concluded that in order to make the Hitler Youth an epic orginisation, all other youth groups must be shut down and the Hitler Youth must be the sole and best organisation for young Germans. His idea worked and with much encouragement and promotion of the benefits of joining, by 1936 the number of members had reached a staggering 4 million. Although this was a huge number Hitler was not convinced that it would satisfy his dreams, so in that same year, 1936, Hitler made it compulsory to be a member but not compulsory to be an active one. In 1939 and the introduction of war, attendance of non-active members had dropped to 25%, so Hitler made it compulsory to be an active member."
| |
|
The Rise of Hitler, 2002.
This paper looks closely at Hitler's rise to power while commenting on the weak enforcement of the Treaty of Versailles.
2,705 words (approx. 10.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 57.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a step by step approach to looking at the way in which Adolph Hitler rose to power in post-WWI Germany. The writer asserts that, even though one may not agree with his teachings, it is clear that Hitler was one of the most influential people in modern history.
Table of Contents:
The Treaty of Versailles
Young Hitler
Hitler?s Political Beginnings
Formation of the Nazi Party
The Beer Hall Putsch
The "Mein Kampf"
Reorganization
The Depression
Taking Control
From the Paper
"In February of 1920, Hitler urged the Party to holds its first mass meeting. On the 24th, Hitler was thrilled when he entered the large meeting hall in Munich and saw two thousand people waiting. He proceeded to outline the Twenty Five Points of the German Workers' Party, which included; the union of all Germans in a greater German Reich, the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles, citizenship determined by race, a thorough reconstruction of the national education system, and a strong central government for the execution of effective legislation (Hanser 212-217)."
| |
|
Adolf Hitler, 2002.
This paper discusses Adolf Hitler's rise to power and his fall during World War II.
1,760 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Hitler came to power in post-World War I Germany on a platform of promises to restore German pride, to undo the ?humiliation? of the Versailles treaty, restoration of the economy, and hatred of the Jews and Bolshevism. The author believes that Hitler could not rise to power without the support of the German people, who were mesmerized by his emotional speeches and his promises of restoring German ?glory'. The paper points out Hitler?s several tactical blunders that eventually led to his ultimate downfall: Dunkirk, where he ordered the halt of a German advance, and the delayed invasion of Russia.
Table of Contents
Hitler?s Rise to Power
Prelude to WWII
March into Rhineland
Annexation of Austria
Czechoslovakian Crisis and the Munich Pact
Non-Aggression Pact with USSR
Start of World War II
Blitzkrieg
Pinnacle of Hitler?s Power
Battle of Britain
Hitler?s Invasion of the USSR: Beginning of the End
Defeats on Other Fronts
From the Paper
"Despite their policy of appeasement towards Germany, Britain and France also were wary of Hitler?s expansionist designs and had decided that they would declare war if he invaded Poland. Hitler was skeptical about the will of western democracies to fight; and, on September 1, 1939, he decided to ?go for broke? by invading Poland against the advice of his Army that felt it was still not ready for an all out war. Britain and France promptly declared war on Germany which signaled the start of World War II."
| |
|
Hitler?s Rise to Power and the Media Wars, 2002.
A paper which examines the similarities between Hitler's use of propaganda to maintain his power and current product marketing campaigns.
3,679 words (approx. 14.7 pages), 12 sources, APA, £ 72.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows that while some call Hitler?s pamphlets, radio programs and book ?propaganda,? to Hitler they were just good ?marketing.? Hitler constantly used his ?propaganda machine? to tear down the credibility and as defense to negative propaganda being distributed by his sworn enemy, the United States. The paper examines how Hitler used many forms of media to distribute his messages to the masses, including dropping pamphlets from the Hindenburg, one of Nazi Germany?s finest shows of strength and power. This paper compares Hitler's use of this form of propaganda to the the way in which advertizing companies and other forms of media promote products and images, concluding that both are effective forms of brainwashing.
From the Paper
"This ?Propaganda War? grew to epic proportions that would make the best Superbowl advertisers of today proud. Both sides sent a barrage of pamphlets, books, and radio broadcasts, posters and many more creative mediums in an attempt to break the public?s confidence in the other side. When the United States launched their own propaganda war, Hitler tried to use this against them also in a ?look what the meanies are trying to do us? type of idea. He tried to use the United States media campaign to gain credibility for this own cause. The media campaigns used by both sides were impressive."
| |
|
"Hitler: A Study in Tyranny", 2002.
A review of the book "Hitler: A Study in Tyranny" by Alan Bullock.
1,258 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers a review and summary of this book which is an analysis of the complex personality of Adolph Hitler. It looks at the way in which Hitler managed to use the perfect opportunities available to him to rise to power within a few years in Germany. It questions why and how he was able to gain so much support and glory from the people, and how, through Hitler's personality and charisma, he rose to heights he never expected.
From the Paper
"Was Hitler an evil genius? Was he truly the one and only person whose quest for power brought on World War II, and the slaughter of millions on the battlefields and in concentration camps and in bombed-out cities? The answer has to be No! Despite the fact that he lusted for power, that he even described in ?Mein Kampf? what he had hoped to accomplish, he was merely the right person at the right time, in the right place. It might well have been some other charismatic leader who was determine to avenge what he conceived to be the ?wrongs? done Germany at the end of World War I. What Hitler was able to accomplish in his early years -- meaning the Nineteen Twenties, was to take advantage of the German mood, and the unhappiness of the German army, now in disarray. He was also able to take full advantage of internal strife among the various German states, Bavaria, especially. This seems somehow strange, since Bavaria was a Catholic state. Yet, Hitler and some of his comrades craftily brought out the Communist threat (something that he continued until the very end). There had been a number of attempted Communist uprisings that had been suppressed. But, while politics were only one of his causes, he made the most of Germany?s economic plight- high unemployment, inflation, and a general unhappiness and malaise that spread through the entire country. In one of his early speeches he said: ?Until the present day, the half-hearted and lukewarm have remained the curse of Germany?For liberation, something more is needed than an economic policy? (p.95)."
| |
|
Hitler's Personality, 1991.
This paper examines Hitler's life events, which attempts to define, or diagnose, the particular psychological maladies from which Adolph Hitler suffered.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 9 sources, £ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
The intent in the following pages is to provide a basic analysis of certain aspects of Hitler's personality from a psychological perspective.
Biography and Personality
... Hitler had quite a dictatorial father, with whom he never made his peace. At the same time, his father dominated his life, while his mother, who he loved, had little impact on his development. Yet he was described by his schoolteacher as mentally alert, obedient, and lively; Hitler described himself at this age as very vocal and a leader of ... "
| |
|
"Hitler's Pope", 2008.
A review of John Cornwall's "Hitler's Pope", an attempt to expose the truth of the Vatican's role in Hitler's Final Solution.
901 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Cornwall's research that discovered how the actions of specific men in the Vatican, most notably Pope Pius XII, actually enabled the tragedy of the Holocaust to occur. The paper emphasizes the assertion that Pope Pius XII was blinded from the moral duties of the Church he was sworn to defend. The paper is of the opinion that this book is an important reminder of how the Pope and so many other moral and political leaders remained impassive in the face of the horror that was the Holocaust.
From the Paper
"John Cornwall's book entitled Hitler's Pope has a deliberately inflammatory title. Cornwall attempts to expose what he sees as the truth of the Vatican's role in Hitler's Final Solution. He does not believe that the doctrine of the Catholic Church itself supported Hitler's actions in the sense that anything about the true Christian or Catholic spirit could conceivably support the Nazi party's coming to power. He also acknowledges that many individual Catholics worked to thwart Hitler's rise. But Cornwall was moved to research the role of Pope Pious XII, troubled by long-standing allegations that through the Church's institutionalized silence during the war it was complacent in the horror that occurred--and he was horrified by what he discovered."
| |
|
Hitler In U.S. Media from 1920s to 1945, 1991.
This paper discribes the portrayal of Hitler, his rise to power, the war years and his decline, emphasizing the role of media in bringing Hitler down.
3,375 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 16 sources, £ 84.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The media was the major source of information for Americans during the Second World War. In addition, the media created the image of Adolf Hitler as it was perceived by the average American during that time. News about the war was generally received from such sources as radio, newspapers, magazines, and newsreels. These media were also responsible for selling Hitler to the American public. In a way, they acted as propaganda for stirring up American support for the war effort in Europe. The news presentations of Hitler, particularly after the start of World War II, usually showed him as a threat to world peace. The clear message was that Hitler needed to be stopped in order for democracy and freedom to be preserved."
|
|
|
