| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "HISTORY WORLD WAR II": |
|
|
The Causes of World War I and World War II, 2002.
A comparative analysis of the origins of the two World Wars.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper identifies the major causes of World War I and World War II. The causes of both wars lay in the political and military rivalries and consequent alliance building among major European powers. However, the rise of fascism and the Great Depression put World War II in different contexts. The scale of destruction is greater in World War II, but major changes in Western ideas emerged from the destruction of World War I.
| |
|
Revisiting World War II, 2002.
Reviews the history book "World War II: a 50th Anniversary History"
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
For my history book topic, I have chosen World War II: a 50th Anniversary History". The war - the most extensive and destructive of the 20th century, began at Pearl Harbor for the United States and ended several days after the atomic bombing of Nagasaki. In between, some of the fiercest battles in human history took place, until the Allied forces defeated both the European and the Japanese enemy.
| |
|
The Guadalcanal Campaign in the Pacific War of World War II, 1999.
Its place in World War II, and why it can be considered one of the most important events of the war.
1,590 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 8 sources, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In assessing the importance of the Guadalcanal campaign in the war in the Pacific I have attempted to place it in the context of that theatre relative to other important aspects. So rather than attempt to evaluate the Guadalcanal campaign as significant by itself I have examined its causal links with other events. It is common for works on World War II focusing on a particular battle or single campaign, to declare the focus of the work as a ?decisive battle? or ?turning point?. Yet when one examines these battles or campaigns as part of an overall story it becomes clear that they are pieces of a jigsaw. In actuality a chain of events that may have headed in a completely different direction given a slight change in the outcome of any other event within that context. Guadalcanal is such a campaign. "
| |
|
World Wars I and II, 2002.
A discussion of the cause and effects of both World Wars I and II.
1,305 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how the causes of World War I and World War II were not one cataclysmic event but were a multitude of causes that basically derived from Nationalism and Imperialism. It shows how these two factors led to the turmoil in Europe and growing tensions and how the outbreak of World War II is an indirect link to the ending of World War I, which led to many years of chaos in Europe. It analyzes how the resulting economic depressions were a cascade of many more economic issues that Europe and America still face today and how the most radical affect was the Cold War, a war that plagued fear upon the American population for forty five years.
From the Paper
"The first cause of World War II was the intense anger over the Versailles Treaty. This Treaty was signed on June 28, 1919 and basically held Germany responsible for creating this world war. The Versailles Treaty ordered that Germany pay for all the damages that the Allies and their governments endured as a result of this war. Germany was then ordered to cut their army down to 100,000 soldiers, as well as their navy, and do away with their air-force. Germany was also angry that their territory had to be reduced as well. The territory of Alsace and Lorraine was ceded by France and certain sections of Prussia went to present day Poland. Germany felt that this treaty was ?dictated peace? and they proceeded to refuse this treaty. In doing so, the future affects would be another war. "
| |
|
California During World War II, 2008.
An analysis of how the Japanese were treated and how California prospered during World War II.
1,115 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how California was affected by World War II. It discusses the concentration camps that were set up for the Japanese living in America and how their businesses were taken from them. It describes the fear of the Japanese that was felt by the American public. The paper also looks at how the production of war products increased and how the production of different industries prospered in California.
Table of Contents:
Fear and the American People during World War II
Removal of Japanese to Concentration Camps
Businesses during World War II Prospered
From the Paper
"Before discussing why the American people wanted the Japanese removed from California, it is important to grasp the fear they had during this time. "Fear gripped the country and a wave of hysterical antipathy against the Japanese engulfed the Pacific Coast" (Weber). Not only did California and people on the West Coast develop hatred toward the Japanese after the bombing on Pearl Harbor, but people throughout the country were afraid the Japanese might be spies or they might turn against them. John Rankin, a Mississippi Congressman, stated, "I'm for catching every Japanese in America, Alaska and Hawaii now and putting them in concentration camps and shipping them back to Asia as soon as possible ... This is a race war, as far as the Pacific side of the conflict is concerned" (Weber). Quite clearly, they wanted the Japanese removed from their homes and put into concentration camps even if they were American citizens."
| |
|
Black Men during World War II, 2008.
Examines what it meant to be an adult black male in Alabama in World War II
3,340 words (approx. 13.4 pages), 19 sources, APA, £ 67.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that existing as a black man in Alabama during World War II, or in fact existing as a black man anywhere in the United States, was to be a man viewed as having little intellectual capacity. The paper then goes on to describe the involvement of black men in the WWII military, noting that, while the black man appeared to make great progress during World War II, these same men were to understand quickly that in reality, nothing had changed. However, for these black men, returning home from the war, it no longer seemed right or natural to 'stay in their place' because they had gained a new and larger perspective of their place. The author concludes that, while the Civil Rights movement did not arise immediately from this WWII experience, it did influence the future.
Table of Contents:
Objective
Terms and Definitions
Introduction
World War II
The Tuskegee Airmen
The Alabama Experience
Jim Crow Laws
Returning from the War
Summary and Conclusion
From the Paper
"As already stated it was believed that the black man did not have the intellectual capacity to do things the white man could do and specifically, during the Second World War, it was not believed that the black man could pilot a plane. The struggle of African Americans to gain entry to the Army Air Corps had been ongoing since the use of planes was introduced into warfare during the First World War. In April of 1939, Public Law 18 which called for an expansion of the Air Corps was passed with part of the law containing an authorization to create black training programs in colleges."
| |
|
World War II, 2004.
A brief discussion of World War II.
703 words (approx. 2.8 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 17.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses and analyzes the Second World War. The paper claims that World War II was a turning point in world history and brought together many allies to fight strong opponents for world domination. The paper explains that the war was supposed to be the "last" world war fought, but other conflicts since that time show that the world is still a volatile and unsettled place.
From the Paper
"World War II was fought on two major fronts - Europe and Asia. There was also fighting in North Africa, and many Pacific Islands. The initial war began in 1939 when German dictator Adolph Hitler invaded Poland. England and France had pledged to support Poland as Hitler continued to take over countries in Europe, such as Austria and Czechoslovakia in the late 1930s. When Hitler invaded Poland, France and England issued ultimatums to Germany which were ignored, and the war had officially begun, even though actual fighting by England and France did not really begin until 1940 (Kitchen 6-11). Initially, the Soviet Union signed a pact with Germany, while England, France, and most of the European countries were allied against Germany. Later, Italy and Japan also became German allies."
| |
|
World War II, 2004.
An overview of the causes and main events of World War II.
1,340 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how World War II bought the greatest destruction that the world has ever witnessed and how the war was so intense that literally no part of the world was spared from the grave consequences. It examines reasons, the events, and the outcome of the war, which started in September 1st, 1939, continued for six full years, and ended in August of 1945 after the devastating atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which forced Japan to surrender.
Outline
Thesis
Introduction
Events that led to the War
Treaty of Versailles
Failure of the League of Nations
The Rise of Dictatorship and Arms race
Hitler?s Aggressive Policies
Important Events of the War
War in Poland and the Western Front
The Battle of Britain
Russian War Against Germany
American Entry into the War (Pearl Harbor)
The End of the War (Atom Bomb)
The Results of World War Two
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Of all the reasons the most direct one for the breakout of the war was the Hitler?s aggressive colonizing policies. In violation of the treaty of Locarno [Ben John], Hitler invaded Rhineland in 1936. This was followed by the annexure of Sudetenland and Austria in 1938. Britain signed the Munich agreement with Germany to prevent further colonization but Hitler again breached the agreement by annexing Czechoslovakia in 1939. This was followed by Hitler?s demand for Danzig (in Poland), which was rejected leading to the German invasion of Poland in September 1, 1939 and marking the beginning of the Second World War. Britain and France entered the war against Germany in conformation with the pact with Poland."
| |
|
World War II, 2006.
A discussion regarding America's involvement in World War II.
831 words (approx. 3.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at America's reluctance to participate in World War II. The paper goes on to review the issues that led to the US finally getting involved. According to the paper, by the time the US entered the war, Hitler's Nazis had invaded much of Europe. The paper concludes with the idea that the American involvement in World War II transformed the role of the United States on the world's stage. What was formerly an isolationist nation found itself on the forefront of international politics.
From the Paper
"Germany would later retract on its neutrality agreement with the Soviets, by attempting to invade Russia. The unsuccessful invasion of Moscow would become one of the reasons for the eventual Nazi defeat. An emboldened Soviet Union made inroads into Eastern Europe and eventually Germany and under pressure from several fronts at once, the Nazis were forced to surrender unconditionally. Germany surrendered less than a month after President Roosevelt died."
| |
|
World War II, 2002.
A review of the book "The Reluctant Belligerent: American Entry into World War II" by Robert A. Divine.
1,303 words (approx. 5.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how "The Reluctant Belligerent: American Entry into World War II" by Robert A. Divine chronicles the history of American isolationist diplomatic policy and quasi-isolationist diplomatic policy up to and slightly after the onset of America?s entry into World War II. It examines how Divine?s book argues that American policy actually exacerbated the international tensions that existed before America?s entry into the war. It also discusses how the book suggests that American policy prolonged the subsequent world conflict, rather than stemming or containing the conflict?s eventual spread to the far corners globe.
From the Paper
"Divine, despite his stress upon a conceptual framework of isolationism versus interventionism in international affairs, still used the methods of an historian to structure his text. Thus, he took a chronological approach to the evolving conflict between America and Europe over the preceding decade to intervention and mobilization. What was so interesting about this approach, first and foremost, for a student of American history, was that Divine showed the evolving conflict from an American perspective, even though America was not formerly involved in the war at the time. Usually, American history books focus merely upon the Great Depression during the period, prior to America?s entry into World War II but after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Divine did examine how the economic impact of the depression affected America?s perceptions as an international diplomatic actor and reactor."
| |
|
Effects of World Wars I & II, 2003.
An examination on the effects of world war I & II on America.
1,840 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 18 sources, MLA, £ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the effects of World Wars I & II on America's economy and human/social movements. It discusses the critical issues involved. The author expands on how the wars, especially World War II transformed the American economy, expanding the role of government. It highlights the blunting of social reform during both wars.
| |
|
European Economics after World War II, 2008.
An analysis of the devastating effect of World War II on the European economy.
3,238 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the economic impact that World War II had on Europe. It provides a brief history of the lead-up to the war and the cost of the war in terms of human casualty and then analyzes why World War II had such a devastating effect on the European economy. Finally, the paper discusses the rapid growth of the post-War golden age in Europe and the factors that contributed to it.
From the Paper
"The economy of Europe lagged far behind the United States after World War II and into the 50s (Eichengreen 2007). Its gross domestic product level was barely half American levels per person. The mass production methods in the US, which were introduced in the first half of the 20th century were just arriving in Europe at this time. Typical automobiles and modern household appliances in the US were still few and exceptional in Europe. Even 50 years later, Western Europe was still far from the US in terms of per capita GDP. But institutions of European integration wiped this difference in the quality of life so marked 50 years ago. They locked peaceful Germany into Europe so as to unleash its huge industrial might. It was something, which France and other European countries would not have allowed. These institutions created the Common Market, which in turn induced the huge expansion of trade and increased efficiency. Through the Single Market Program set up in 1986, these European institutions created a continental economy, which can now support global champion firms at a scale and a scope that could compete internationally. And with the introduction of the Euro, the inflation problem, which plagued Europe in most of the 20th century, disappeared (Eichengreen)."
| |
|
World War II, 2004.
An analysis of the outbreak of World War II and the parties involved.
1,343 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the roles played by the various world leaders during the time of World War II. The paper examines the "brotherly competition" between Hitler and Mussolini, presenting an outline of each of their political moves. The paper contends that, of all the nations involved in World War II, the Soviet Union suffered the worse casualties and privations at the hands of the Germans, despite the fact that the Germans had, finally, to give up on the Russian front long before Allied victory was declared elsewhere.
From the Paper
"In fact, Hitler had been violating treaties with the rest of Europe for years. Hitler had violated the Versailles Treaty that ended World War I?as well as calling for Germany to disarm its navy and armies. A 1935 agreement allowing Germany to rebuild its navy, despite the Versailles Treaty, was the beginning of the appeasement road. By 1937, Hitler had remilitarized the German army as well, and had stationed it in the Rhineland. Had Great Britain sided with the French in objecting to and preventing Hitler from doing that, it is thought by some that the German people would have risen in revolt against Hitler and thus World War II would probably have been prevented (Goldsborough, 2003). That is speculative, however, coming from some revisionist historians. What is undeniable as an impetus to war is Hitler?s violation of the Munich Accords."
| |
|
World War II, 2006.
A discussion regarding the US participation in World War II.
1,872 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 7 sources, APA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews and discusses the role that the US played in World War II. The paper reports how, during the dedication ceremonies of the National World War II Memorial, US President George W. Bush remarked on how American unity and resolve, and the leadership of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, steered the course and outcome of the war in those days of hardship and uncertainty.
From the Paper
"Insights that can be drawn from the effectiveness of this framework on the economy of America also pointed to the extent of its influence in the outcome of World War II. First, it meant that the success of modern, large-scale warfare highly depended on the ability to plan, build and convert capacity, reallocate resources, to mass-produce standardized high-quality output, and coordinate material and product flows through an efficient supply chain. Second, the key to efficiency was not centralized coordination but the revitalization and reallocation of resources. Third, special interest groups would vie for influence in large-scale political-economic institutions. Moreover, the elites in the contemporary United States wielded power in commercial, political and military institutions in the last 70 or more years. There were similar and robust struggle among elites and interest groups in Eastern Europe, Russia and China at the time. Mobilization for World War II happened when the US economy was quite self-sufficient in the 1930s when global gross domestic product went to its lowest levels in the past 150 years."
|
|
|
