| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "HISTORY CRIME PUNISHMENT": |
|
|
Symbolism in "Crime and Punishment", 2004.
Describes the symbolism that was lost in the translation of Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" from Russian to English and also takes a look at the general symbolism of the book and some history.
1,189 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Explains some history of Russian dialogue, Russian history, and Fyodor Dostoevsky's life experiences. It tells the symbolism of the names in "Crime and Punishment," how Fyodor Dostoevsky was imprisoned, and the history of Russian tsarist government.
From the Paper
"Authors write their novels using literary techniques such as symbolism. However, when entire novels are translated from the native language to another, there are some things that are lost in translation. Fyodor Dostoevsky wrote Crime and Punishment in Russian and when the novel was translated to English, symbolism was lost in translation. The symbolism requires knowledge of Russian history and language and some history of Fyodor Dostoevsky's life, to know and understand. Without prior knowledge of the use of some names and words, the symbolism is unknown to the reader."
| |
|
Criminal Justice - Crime & Punishment, 2008.
A descriptive perception of the concept of crime and punishment, social control, and defined concepts of justice.
1,646 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 6 sources, APA, £ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper states that only the human species is known to inflict pain purely for retribution. The fact that justice and punishment for rule violations are evident in animals, and that different human cultures have defined justice, crime, and punishment in myriad, and often in mutually contradictory terms, suggests the need to establish objective principles for concepts of justice that are indeed just. The paper concludes that "justice" incorporates objective rules without basis, which reflect the strength to impose the will of the of those more powerful in society, over the less powerful. The paper also states that crime and punishment are exclusive to human societies, notwithstanding our current relative inability to administer those concepts uniformly and justly, in most human society.
Outline:
A Survey of Cultural Variation of Crime and Punishment Throughout History
Toward the Objective Standard of Justifiable Criminal Definitions and Punishment
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In particular, purposeful actions on the part of society or dominant group of leaders to address unwanted behaviors or actions of the individual is apparent among many animal species, such as in relation to violations of established social and pair-bonding relationships and hierarchy of access to food and other natural resources (Gerrig & Zimbardo 2005). In certain primates, for example, group members risk both physical retaliation and elements of social exclusion if they are discovered by other group members to have hidden or failed to share resources by not disclosing its existence or location."
| |
|
History of Crime and Punishment, 2002.
An examination of the philosophy and logic behind crime and punishment in practices in Europe in 17-18th Centuries.
3,658 words (approx. 14.6 pages), 15 sources, MLA, £ 71.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper traces the history crime and punishment in Europe. It looks at the influences of that time the social and philosophical movements and how they affected the whole evolution of treatment of crime and the thought behind punishment. The paper details about the neoclassical period, its forbearers and how they regarded the issue of crime and punishment and their assumptions regarding the problem.
From the Paper
"Crime is as old as civilization itself and where you find groups of people, you will consistently find some shape of criminal activity. You will also find punishment. The criminal has always been seen as undermining the values and, even, the very fabric of the society she or he deceives. Accordingly, those found out or found culpable have often been dealt with unsympathetically. Again, the Jewish Mythology will spring to the Western mind with its mantra of an eye for an eye etc. Very often, to the contemporary western mind, the harshness of the penalty was far in excess of the gravity of the original offence. However, the prehistoric, medieval or even early modern people of western society did not like the insights into human behavior which modern society claims for itself. To them, the criminal was, quite simply, a threat to the order, which was essential for the very existence of their society. As society developed and the great cities of the world began to develop and swell so too did the criminal alliance grow and expand."
| |
|
"Crime and Punishment", 2004.
A literary analysis of "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky.
2,146 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 9 sources, MLA, £ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers a review of Fyodor Dostoevsky?s famous work, "Crime and Punishment". The author explains that "Crime and Punishment" is the story of a desperate young man, Rodion Romanovitch Raskolnikov, who plots the perfect crime. Raskolnikov, alternately called Rodya, Rodenka, and Rodka throughout the novel, is a handsome, but poor student who lives in a garret in the slums of St. Petersburg. He owes money to his landlady and uses the services of a pawnbroker as a way to pay back his landlady. He plans carefully to murder an unattached pawnbroker, Alyona Ivanovna, an old woman loved by no one, whose conduct is despicable and completely unredeemed. He reasons carefully that it is just for a man of genius, such as himself, to commit such a crime and defy moral law because his action ultimately benefits humanity. He is disgusted by the thought of the murder, and yet he eventually kills the pawnbroker. He is ultimately convicted of the murder and sentenced to Siberia.
From the Paper
"Like his other novels, Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" is heavily concerned with the psychological life of his characters. While Dostoevsky was alive, he suffered a great deal of criticism over the poor style of his novels, including their "hysterical and morbid nature", and lacking "balance, restraint, and good taste" (Terras, 4). In defense of Dostoevsky, Terras notes, "Dostoevsky's novels encompass antagonistic philosophies and value systems. He is an excellent 'devil's advocate'. Sophisticated readers have mistaken for his own ideas what Dostoevsky was in fact trying to refute"."
| |
|
"Crime and Punishment" and God's Laws., 2002.
Examines Dostoevsky's novel, "Crime and Punishment" within the context of the Ten Commandments.
1,900 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 4 sources, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
It is most fitting to correlate the Ten Commandments with Dostoevsky's famous novel, "Crime and Punishment", for the anti-hero, Raskolnikov (whom we shall identify from this point on as Rodya, his familiar name), not only breaks many of the Ten Commandments, but he also does so in a blatant manner. In this paper, we will study his deeds and his mindset following the double murder, including his redemptive suffering that eventually causes him to admit to the crime and face his just punishment.
| |
|
Crime and Punishment in Colonial America, 2006.
A research paper on crime and punishment in America between the late Colonial period through the Revolutionary period.
6,792 words (approx. 27.2 pages), 55 sources, MLA, £ 109.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In order to provide a better understanding of what were considered crimes in colonial America as well as what punishments were assigned to those crimes, this paper begins by examining what most colonies based their laws on, English Common Law. The paper then looks at how English Common Law influenced early American law on crime and punishment and compares the early American state laws to English Common Law, noting that the colonists intended to establish a system of criminal justice that was free of the harsh capital and forfeiture penalties that had been experienced in England. The paper also cites examples from history that illustrate these differences.
From the Paper
"Whereas Douglas Hay stated, "the church courts still played a role in "wills and marriages and occasional cases of slander." The result in many cases was that a defendant convicted of a capital felony could plead his clergy, be branded on the thumb, and be sent home. Friedman tells us that clergyable offenses were offenses for which, absent privilege of clergy, the punishment was death. They were therefore generally serious offenses. Manslaughter, for example, was a clergyable felony. And the definition of manslaughter included many offenses that we would define as murder. A killing in a tavern brawl, even one done with a deadly weapon, was manslaughter as long as there was no evidence of premeditation or previous enmity. The killer was allowed to plead his clergy, branded on the thumb, and released."
| |
|
"Trifles" and "Crime and Punishment", 2004.
This paper compares Glaspell's "Trifles" to Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment."
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper offers a comparison of Susan Glaspell's short story "Trifles" with Dostoevsky's novel "Crime and Punishment," based on the interplay of conscience, crime and social experience. The paper describes plots of premeditated murder and the investigation surrounding the murders.
From the Paper
"This research examines ways in which social experience informs conscience and behavior with reference to Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" and Glaspell's play "Trifles" and the short story on which it was based, "A Jury of Her Peers." The research will set forth the cultural context of each narrative and then compare and contrast how conscience-related issues are treated by the texts with a view toward identifying ways in which inter penetrations of conscience and social constructs affect or explain behavior."
| |
|
Futurity and Free Will in "Crime and Punishment", 2007.
A discussion on the dynamics of time in Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment", focusing on the ways in which free will and ideas of good and evil influence the actions of Raskolnikov and Svidrigailov.
3,253 words (approx. 13.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 66.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the idea that Dostoevsky uses futurity in "Crime and Punishment" primarily as a device to tackle the complex problems of predestination and free will, and that his solutions are solidly grounded in Christian thinking. The discussion focuses on two fated events, Raskolnikov's crime and the linking of his life with Sonya's and the appearance of his "double", Svidrigailov, and Raskolnikov's impetus to steer his life in a direction that will keep him from following in the footsteps of a completely unrepentant sinner.
From the Paper
"The moral reader will rightly suggest that Raskolnikov's first choice, central to his redemption, is whether or not to kill the old pawnbroker, and that his misery stems from having used his free will to choose the wrong path. But I would argue that within the Byzantine universe of the novel, the murder is more than the central plot point; it is an inevitable, fated event that sets Raskolnikov's insular, insignificant life in motion. It is the choices he made before--refusing gainful employment (idle hands, after all, are the Devil's plaything), abandoning the faith of his upbringing, adopting a philosophy that gave him the license to place himself above the plane of Heaven's subjects--that have lead him to his present state, in which violent crime is unavoidable. "
| |
|
"Crime and Punishment" and Communism, 2005.
Parallels Dostoevsky's "Crime and Punishment" to Marxist and Communist theories.
675 words (approx. 2.7 pages), 1 source, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment and notes its parallels to Marxist theory. Principally, the paper explores class struggle, atheism, violent revolution and the social causes for proletarian unrest as they reveal themselves in Dostoevsky's nineteenth century masterpiece. The paper argues that, unwittingly, Dostoevsky provides a social template that gives a certain real-world authenticity to Marx's ideas.
From the Paper
"There can be little doubt that communist and Marxist theories suffuse Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. Among other things, this paper will examine the uneasy "capitalist" relationship between the impecunious Raskolnikov and his avaricious landlady. The paper will also examine the redistributive theme found in Dostoevsky's text and its obvious parallel to Marxist theory. From there, the paper will explore the social roots of violence (an idea that is implicit in Marxist thought) and conclude with a look at how the absence of "God" in Raskolnikov's life makes him the ideal proletarian solider in Marx's imaginings. To sum it all up, Dostoevsky's text is a text about Marxist class warfare. As most university students who have studied the philosophy of Marx (and Engels) know, Marxism holds that all human actions, institutions and social distinctions in society are economically determined."
| |
|
"Crime and Punishment", 2005.
An analysis of the descriptive detail in "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the novel "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky. The paper describes the way in which Dostoevsky paid great attention to graphic detail and description when he created the setting and literary atmosphere of this classic novel. Careful study of Dostoevsky's prose style reveals the literary power unleashed by his graphic descriptions of scenes and characters that help to define Dostoevsky's view of the meaning of life, the nature of good and evil and the role of free will.
From the Paper
"Crime and Punishment: An Analysis of Descriptive Elements In Crime and Punishment, Fyodor Dostoevsky paid great attention to graphic detail and description when he created the setting and literary atmosphere of this classic novel. Careful study of Dostoevsky's prose style reveals the literary power unleashed by his graphic descriptions of scenes and characters. These scenes help define Dostoevsky's view of the meaning of life, the nature of good and evil, and the role of free will, which are important throughout the novel and are repeatedly expressed through setting, descriptive narrative, characterization, and plot structure. "
| |
|
"Crime and Punishment", 2004.
An analysis of Raskolnikov, the main character in Fyodor Dostoyevsky?s book, "Crime and Punishment".
1,715 words (approx. 6.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and discusses the following thesis statement: our culture is committed to the idea that suffering, at least in part, redeems a criminal for his actions. This is achieved by providing a character analysis of Raskolnikov in "Crime and Punishment".
From the Paper
"Throughout the book, we come to see that Raskolnikov?s actions have created an internal hell for him and that no court of law can punish him, the way he is punishing himself for his crimes. He has created his own internal hell and we can feel his internal angst and pain.
In today?s society, most people want to know that justice inflicts pain on the criminal. Whether it be, imprisonment for some obscure period of time or punishment by death. The method of pain is immaterial. Society wants to know that there has been some form of payback for the crimes that were committed.
Raskolnikov is a pathetic character from the very beginning. He is a poor student, who is in debt and lives in rather squalid quarters with no hope of bettering his life. He plots to murder a pawnbroker. The murder takes place early in the novel but not until we have lived through Raskolnikov?s plotting and planning. As he does so, there is not sense of being touched by good or evil. He has come to terms with what he must do and feels that he is beyond either."
| |
|
Dreams in "The Double" and "Crime and Punishment", 2000.
Looks at how dreams are used as insight into the fears of the characters in Dostoevsky's Novels "The Double" and "Crime and Punishment".
1,585 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 0 sources, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at dream sequences in Dostoevsky's novels "The Double" and "Crime and Punishment" and analyzes how they allow the reader to understand more about the psychology of the characters in a way that would be difficult to portray in the character's waking thoughts and actions.
From the Paper
"In both The Double and Crime and Punishment, Dostoevsky describes dream sequences that are very revealing about the fears of Mr. Golyadkin and Raskolnikov. Using his characters? nightmares as a way to convey something about their psychology allows Dostoevsky to reveal the characters? mental state with an untainted honesty that is not possible in their thoughts and actions. In this way, Dostoevsky is able to crystallize and clarify the characters? deepest fears. In particular, the examination of Golyadkin?s dream about his double turning everyone against him reveals that his peers? opinions of him are of the highest importance to him, and as such, his great fear is that others will dislike him. Raskolnikov?s dream about the horse reveals his fear of his own weakness, his fear and repression of his past, and his fear of his own humanity and capacity for compassion."
| |
|
Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment, 2005.
A review of some of the characters in "Crime and Punishment" by Fyodor Dostoevsky.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 1 source, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This essay examines some characters in the novel "Crime and Punishment" by the Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky. Through the examination of some of the main characters the essay attempts to discuss which personality traits Dostoevsky admired and which characteristics he disliked in people, particularly those found in the Russian society of his time.
From the Paper
" Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment This essay examines some characters in the novel Crime and Punishment by the Russian author Fyodor Dostoevsky. Through the examination of some of the main characters the essay will attempt to discuss which personality traits Dostoevsky admired and which characteristics he disliked in people, particularly those found in Russian society of his time. In Crime and Punishment Dostoevsky uses the characters of to demonstrate traits he admires, like humility, compassion, sacrifice and family bonds as well as traits he dislikes like vanity, lack of morals and shallowness. Dostoevsky's main character in Crime and Punishment is a study of the duality of human nature and the fight between good and evil."
| |
|
Crime and Punishment of the Medieval Period, 2003.
An examination of crime trends and punishment methods practiced in medieval Europe.
1,874 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
During the medieval period, order was assembled through an established, organized code called secular law, in which church and state worked hand in hand to create stability within a community. This paper explains how medieval secular law branched from a mixture of Roman and Germanic barbarian law and interwove with the Christian doctrine. This secular law had been handed down from one illiterate generation to another in the collective consciousness of the community. The possession of the right to dispense law and justice did not necessarily restrain self-interest, nor did it promote in the possessor any interest in behaving accordingly. Vengeance was often the only remedy known to secular law and was regularly enacted, often out of proportion to the original transgression.
From the Paper
"Medieval Europe has been greatly dramatized by our modern culture, celebrating and exploring these centuries with a critical sense of awe. On the one hand we now portray the Medieval era as a romantically simple time, and on the other hand as a brutish time of ignorance and cruelty. Both of these stereotypes do have some basis in fact. The Medieval period was characterized by lives that were, as Hobbes would say, ?nasty, brutish, and short,? but there was an overarching sense of sublime artistic merit to the cruelties of this period. Some of the most fascinating events of the era are in the field of crime and punishment."
|
|
|
