| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "GROUP DYNAMICS COMMUNICATION": |
|
|
Group Decision In Communicating, 2002.
Explanation of what constitutes group decision in communicating and discussion of some of the theories regarding group decision.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 18 sources, £ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is on group decisions in communicating. Group decision communicating often consists of orientation, conflict, emergence, and reinforcement. Decision-emergence theory is an explanation of the complex communication process that groups go through in doing any projects. These steps often make or break the group.
| |
|
Group Dynamics on Campus, 2001.
This paper looks at the concept of group dynamics in sociology and how it is applied in practice in a university campus.
1,200 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 3 sources, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the sociological concept of group dynamics. It claims that many theories have been written about the topic, but the best way to experience this phenomena is to watch students on campus. This paper is the personal account and observations of a student studying group dynamics.
From the paper:
"Group dynamics is the term given to the scientific study of group behavior, and it is of crucial sociological importance if we wish to advance our knowledge and understanding of the nature of groups, their development and the relationships that exist within and between them. The majority of social scientists examine the concepts of group dynamics through the collation of empirical research and the development of scientific theories. This paper, however, will focus on the application of these theories and issues in relation to specific aspects of everyday life on campus."
| |
|
The General Dynamics Company, 2005.
This paper discusses the strategic management of the General Dynamics company.
3,510 words (approx. 14.0 pages), 18 sources, APA, £ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that the company General Dynamics was founded to generate value meant for shareholders through the use of industrial dynamics by harnessing technology which captures motion, energy, potential and development. The author points out that the strength of the company emanates from the expertise of the core technologies, which form the markets addressed, and the accurate implementation of the management's vision for getting the maximum return by fulfilling the requirements of the customer, present and in the future. The paper concludes that strategic planning is the sole path in which a top management impact the manner in which the organization functions; therefore, in an organization like General Dynamics, the planning process undergoes constant improvement, which is executed continually at the tactical stage across the entire company.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Analysis
International Business
Legal, Ethical and Social Responsibilities
Planning to include Strategic Management
Operating Management and Plans
Organizing work and Structure
Work Teams Utilization
Staffing
Employee and Management Development
Motivating Employees
Leading
Conflict Management and Stress
Managing Change
Controlling
Appraising and Rewarding
Operations Control
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Employee recognition is not a just a pretty gesture to do for people. Employee recognition constitutes a communication instrument which strengthens and rewards the most crucial results people build for the business. When people are recognized effectively, there is a strengthening of the preferred means of recognition, the action and behaviors which is most often desired to be repeated. An efficient employee recognition system is simple, instantaneous and powerfully reinforcing. When the employee recognition processes is considered, this is equally powerful for the organization as well as the employee."
| |
|
The Dynamics of Politics in Cultural Pluralism, 2006.
Discusses the topic of racism in America as a way of conveying how political dynamics affect the power struggle between blacks and whites.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 0 sources, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the basis of political dynamics in cultural pluralism must rely on an ideological presence, but also with the reality of power struggles that seek to undermine ethnic unification. By examining the microcosm of racism in America, one can understand how political dynamics plays a role in the struggle for power between whites and blacks. Oftentimes, the role of government and ethical documents (The Bill of Rights and the Constitution) are portrayed ideologically, but cannot be reproduced through the direct actions of that self-same government.
From the Paper
"In this sociological study a summary of the political dynamics of cultural pluralism will be examined. The basis of politics in America and on the world stage offer differing perspectives as to how political differences idealize or make practical cultural differences between different ethnicities or races. To define the ideological and realistic application of cultural pluralism in this manner will provide information as to how ethnic struggles and adaptabilities are politically applied. In essence, by summarizing the essence of cultural pluralism through modern political examples, one can realize the diverse realities and ideological stances that are practiced within a sociological structure. The reality of ethnic diversity in America relates a national example of how race become a serious issue when seeking a greater political understanding of cultural pluralism. The problem of dynamics relates to issue of identity in that African-Americans are a minority that has..."
| |
|
Group Dynamics, 2004.
An analysis of group dynamics through a review of Bruce Tuckman's studies.
1,240 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses Bruce Tuckman's studies of group dynamics. The paper examines his "Forming-Storming-Norming-Performing" model of team development, which focused on better understanding of group dynamics. The paper explains that Tuckman maintained that groups pass through four important stages as they gain maturity and establish important connections with each other.
From the Paper
"In the first stage, a group is highly depended on the leader who directs and guides them since they are not familiar with their roles. There is usually low agreement on what the team should achieve and how. Roles are ambiguously defined and thus chances of conflicts are bright. In the second stage of storming, team members fight for their place in the group. Each tries to vie for the best position or more authority as they ease into their new roles as team members. In this stage, power struggles are common."
| |
|
Group Dynamics and Teamwork, 2002.
Case studies of companies using group dynamics and teamwork.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines and analyzes group dynamics and team work, discusses related issues, and provides three company examples of how organizations are dealing with group dynamics.
| |
|
Mechanics and Dynamics, 2004.
Overview of dynamics, a branch of study that analyzes motion in relation to objects.
3,426 words (approx. 13.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper first defines mechanics, a branch of study that deals with the influence of forces acting on bodies and dynamic responses of bodies to the imposition of those forces, and then lists the three different subdivision of mechanics. Included in this subdivision is dynamics, which the paper also explains and describes as it relates to the study of mechanics.
From the Paper
"Life without motion is better explained as death. A living being is said to be having life only when the walls of the heart engage in pumping the blood, when the blood circulates through the entire body, when nerves impulse electrically from brain to toe, lungs move to bring oxygen, food transports through the stomach and intestines, when the iris expands and contracts, when the eyeball rotates, etc. Not only in the living beings, the riddles of the non-living items like recoiling of a fired gun, acceleration of an automobile, action of a spinning top, the motion of a space rocket can also be broken down in terms of the analysis of motion."
| |
|
Family Dynamics, 2008.
This paper explores the dynamics of familial interactions and characterization in National Lampoon's film "Christmas Vacation."
2,281 words (approx. 9.1 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper addresses the family dynamics of the Griswold family in National Lampoon's classic parody of Christmas films, "Christmas Vacation," using Dorthea Orem's model of universal self-care. The paper provides an experiment into the functionality of a fictional family through exploring the characters of Clark Griswold (husband and father), Ellen Griswold (wife and mother), Audrey Griswold (teenage daughter), Rusty Griswold (son in early adolescence) and Eddie Johnson (cousin-in-law).
Outline:
Introduction
Cultural Assessment of Family Structure
Universal Self-Care Requisites
Developmental Self-Care Requisites
Nursing Systems Used to Meet These Issues
Conclusion
From the Paper
"The Griswold family is a traditional nuclear family consisting of father, mother, and two siblings (male and female). Typically, all interaction within this family is expressed between the four primary members. In the film, circumstances are altered so that the immediate family is changed and multiple members of the extended family are brought into stay within the same household. This affects the dynamics of the immediate family and impedes normal behavior. According to Orem's theories, it is now no longer possible for the Griswold family to engage in their conventional stable roles within this setting. However, the actions of the immediate Griswold family indicate that their roles are highly defined and that they are attempting to conform to them. This is especially evident in the actions of Clark and Ellen."
| |
|
Marx's Analysis Of The History And Dynamics Of Capitalism Compared With Rousseau's Arguments In His Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality., 2002.
A comparison of Marx's analysis of the history and dynamics of capitalism with Rousseau.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This three-page undergraduate paper compares and contrasts Marx's analysis of the history and dynamics of capitalism with Rousseau's arguments in his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality. It discusses various points that show a substantive difference between Marx and Rousseau.
| |
|
Group Dynamics and Technology, 2008.
An examination of group dynamics in a technological world.
1,557 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 36.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines whether group dynamics become increasingly relevant, practical or important as society adjusts to a more technological and united world. The paper explains that although technology has enabled human beings to become more isolated, hiding behind their computer screens on one hand, for an organization to manage the increasingly complex processes required for its operations, encouraging individuals to work in teams is increasingly valued, and the ability to cooperate is seen as an essential character trait in employees. The paper then points out that organizations in the future will face the challenge of having to unite workers who may be less and less well-versed in the emotional skills necessary to create a cohesive group unit. The paper also looks at how, as organizations grow ever-larger, newly merged entities must bring together a variety of individuals from diverse backgrounds and skills to work together.
From the Paper
"Group activity is often referred to as "shared cooperative activity" which is something fewer and fewer Americans are seeking in their leisure time activities. Civic affiliation is on the decline yet more and more employers are demanding they engage in teamwork at work, as noted in Putnam's landmark 1995 sociological study Bowling Alone. The image of people bowling alone, side-by-side in the same building, but not involved in the same game demonstrates how an activity that multiple people happen to perform simultaneously is not a group activity, with the type of interactive dynamics necessary for creative and productive dialogue (Pavitt, 2004). Rather, a true group is a collection of people with the intention of pursuing some shared goal, intending to act together, in the pursuit of that agreed-upon purpose. Charles Pavitt adds the caveat that each person in a group must intend that each other person in the aggregate acts in pursuit of the goal."
| |
|
Group Dynamics, 2002.
An examination of the effect of group dynamics on the workplace.
1,467 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 13 sources, MLA, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how group dynamics are central to the effective functioning of the work group. It shows how by understanding the group processes which affect people?s roles in their place of work, is an understanding of the three major aspects of groups: managing conflict, communication and trust linked with social interdependence. It reviews these three concepts in turn and shows how although some groups struggle with a new structure, the future lies in achieving good communication, managing conflicts (including the hidden agenda) and developing healthy relationships, which will lead to trust and social interdependence. The success of a group rests not only with these but also with the group members as individuals and their ability to achieve a fuller harmony and healthy balance on the physical, psychological, spiritual and social level.
From the Paper
"A conflict situation within groups can be seen as an opportunity to grow, however it can also contain risks to the healthy state of a group. It is not the presence of conflicts but the way they are managed, which determines whether they are a positive or a negative force within a group (Johnson & Johnson, 2000, p.381). Martin Luther King postulated in 1964 (and the sentiment applies to small groups as much as large): ?Mankind [sic] must evolve for all human conflict a method, which rejects revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method is love?. Many groups spend considerable time trying to reach agreement which ?satisfies our needs and meets our goals? (Johnson & Johnson, 2000, p.383). Conflicts arise in groups over the relevance of agenda. One group member may comment that he/ she is not interested in a specific program being organized by someone else."
| |
|
Group Dynamics and Communication, 2008.
A study of how a nursing staff improved the effectiveness of their team through group dynamics and communication.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 5 sources, APA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the issue of group dynamics and communication by analyzing how the nursing staff on a head injury unit worked together with a team leader and a psychologist to find ways to reduce the escalating levels of aggression among patients. The paper examines factors that affect team effectiveness such as the team's productivity, quality, and timeliness, the strategies it uses to enhance its ability to work together in the future, and how the group experience contributes to the learning and well-being of team members. The paper also stresses the importance of open communication, group decision-making, cohesion, and motivation. The paper concludes that the nursing staff was able to achieve its goals through the strategies they learned and devised as a team, and most importantly, through their cohesion as a work group and their motivation.
From the Paper
"The team's task needs to correspond to the team's purpose. The team size should be as small as possible, must include members with adequate task and interpersonal skills, and should be marked by diversity. The size of the team was not a problem and there was ample diversity. Diversity means having people who are not too similar or so different that they cannot communicate or coordinate properly with one another (Wageman, 2005). The problem with the team was more based in personality where some members were introverts and others were not inclined to speak out. All groups are based on the idea of cooperative group norms that reflect the team members' shared pursuits, shared objectives, and mutual interests If the group has strong expectations about cooperation, the members expect each other to engage in information sharing (Ng & Van Dyne, 2005). Once again, the team leader needed to act on the discrepancy. The team leader is there to coordinate and motivate, and to build commitment to the group and its task, and to help find innovative ways to accomplish the tasks (Wageman, 2005)."
| |
|
"Survivor" and Group Dynamics, 2001.
This paper looks how the TV series "Survivor" reflects true group dynamics .
1,124 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 2 sources, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper starts by defining group dynamics and examines the popular TV series "Survivor" exemplifies this concept. It states that TV viewers experience a taste of reality when watching the show as it "stars" real people. The essence of the series is forming a solid group and thereafter dismantling it.
From the paper:
"Television, like most media forms, is intended to show, rather than simply tell, something about the human condition. As a viewer, television has the capacity to act as a mirror into our own lives, or the lives of people we know. Current television shows allow viewers to leave the stresses of their own lives, and become a part of the lives of characters we relate to, or who are so far from our own experiences that we forget about our own problems, anxieties and worries, to participate in the often tranquil or happily exciting lives of another person."
| |
|
Group Dynamics, 2005.
This paper discusses the assessment group dynamics on two key variables.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 5 sources, £ 31.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a group assessment on two key variables, which are the ability of each group member to communicate and share information and their ability to achieve each individual assigned task. The author points out that data on the group's dynamics will be evaluated in terms of these variables. The paper relates that the results of this evaluation will be addressed and recommendations will be made regarding the group and its effectiveness.
From the Paper
"Group settings offer participants a number of challenges in order to facilitate success. Unfortunately, many groups are thrown together for a given purpose without consideration of the contributions that each member may bring to the setting, as well as the possibility that there may be problems with communication or in sharing the workload. A group assessment was conducted with regards to two distinct variables, including the ease in communication amongst group members and the delegation of task assignments that were successfully accomplished by each member. These variables were evaluated in greater to determine the effectiveness of the group dynamic as a whole, and the following discussion will identify the assessment process as a whole."
|
|
|
