| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "GROUP COMMUNICATION DECISION MAKING METHODS": |
|
|
Empowerment and Group Decision Making, 2005.
Considers how empowerment and participative decision making improves the decision making process within organizations.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 7 sources, APA, £ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper considers how empowerment and participative decision making improves the decision making process within organizations. It looks at downsizing efforts that empower workers and the benefits to the organization of participative decision making.
From the Paper
"In recent years groups have become increasingly important in the American workplace as companies move toward fewer managers, more empowered workers and away from hierarchical organizational structures ..."
| |
|
Group Communication and Decision-Making Methods, 2007.
A discussion regarding group communication and effective decision-making methods.
1,828 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 41.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an introduction to group-decision making methods and models. The paper reviews the best decision-making strategies groups can utilize to realize effective solutions to complex problems. The paper further explains how problem-solving methodology is utilized to reach consensus decisions among small groups.
Outline:
Introduction
Overview of Group Decision-Making Methods
Best Decision-Making Tactics
Problem-Solving Methodology in Group Settings
Cooperative and Competitive Group Resolution
Describe Group Issues in Creative Problem Solving
Behavior in Group Settings
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In a small group setting group processes that require improvement include situations where full group participation is not realized, especially when a majority vote is required for consensus. Other examples of situations where small group processes require improvement include those where unresolved arguments or conflicts exist that prevent group members from communicating clearly and addressing relevant issues at hand (Johnson & Johnson, 2000). In a small group process it is best not to consider certain members of a group or the majority as "winners" compared to the minority that may lose as "losers" as stated by Johnson & Johnson (2000) for this may "reduce the quality of the decision" (Foundation Coalition, 2007) and diminish the effectiveness of the resolution. Competition should not be the primary focus of a group decision-making setting because this will not lead to solution-oriented thinking. Rather than focusing on the problem that requires solving, group members are more likely to entertain themselves with methods they can employ to "win" other members of the group to their line of thinking or problem-solving methods."
| |
|
Group Decision Making, 2002.
An overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the group decision making process.
1,166 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines how decision making is an extremely important activity in our professional and personal lives. It looks at how it has been found that decisions resulting from group brainstorming are of higher quality than the solutions discovered by an individual, due to the involvement of more than one person and a conglomeration of ideas that are sorted and sifted to reach the most effective solution. It also attempts to show that group decision making can be highly effective if certain guidelines are followed and how it is important for each member to participate enthusiastically and work together to minimize risks of conflict.
From the Paper
"Group decision-making process follows certain important steps to reach effective solutions or discover suitable answers to various questions. Usually groups are invited to participate in a decision-making process when a problem has arisen which requires help from more than one head. Small teams are formed and they are given a problem to discuss and seek a solution to. ?Group decisions that usually require a substantial amount of deliberation, negotiation, and accommodation prior to an acceptable outcome.? (Ruppel, 1997) However just asking a group to reach a suitable solution might prove to be counter productive if the team has little or no idea of the steps that are to be followed."
| |
|
Group Decision Making, 1995.
This paper discusses group decision making: Need for in organization, role of leader, problem-solving, conflicts and advantages and disadvantages.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 8 sources, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"In recent years, groups have become increasingly important in the American workplace as companies move toward fewer managers, more empowered workers and away from hierarchical organizational structures. With the emergence of groups, many of which form and are re-formed over the course of years within an organization, the way in which individuals interact within those groups has become important to managers and workers alike. Of particular importance is the way that groups arrive at decisions. This research examines group decision making, including approaches to it, advantages and disadvantages, and the changing role of the leader in the process.
The Need for Group Decision Making
The most fundamental decisions are made by individuals. When several individuals ... "
| |
|
Decision Making in Small Groups, 1991.
A look at the advantages and disadvantages, leadership style and techniques such as brainstorming and nominal group.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 6 sources, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
This research provides a literature review of decision-making processes in small groups. This literature review is performed within the general context of small group communications.
THE GROUP DECISION-MAKING CONCEPT
Decision-making in groups has been described as a process of behavior with the economic model (or total rationality) at one extreme, and with the social model (or complete irrationality) at the other extreme (Kimberly & Rottman, 1987). This description implies that only irrational decision-making accords human values precedence over economic values. In the group environments of the early-1990s, some middle ground must be found between these extremes, for it is evident that neither set of values can be..."
| |
|
Group Decision Making, 1997.
Definition, advantages & disadvantages, dangers of and solutions to groupthink.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Introduction
In recent years, there has been a trend in management toward participatory management and the use of committees or quality circles which empower groups of employees to control more of their work environment. While many analysts cite the advantages of this trend, there are drawbacks associated with it as well. In addition to the time and resource costs that group decision making requires, there is the very real possibility that "groupthink" will become part of the decision making process. This tendency of highly cohesive groups to engage in self perpetuating and self-reinforcing behavior can lead to lower quality decisions than if different techniques were employed. In these situations, companies and organizations receive less than the full benefit of the group decision making process. This research examines group .."
| |
|
Decision-Making, 2007.
This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making versus individual decision-making.
1,590 words (approx. 6.4 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 37.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper states that some of the advantages of group decision-making over individual decision-making is that there are more resources, the work load can be spread evenly amongst all of the members of the group and there are more diverse viewpoints. The author points out that the disadvantages of group decision-making is that the process is more time consuming, there is more pressure to conform, and there is a possibility of unfair treatment and questionable leadership. The paper concludes that the type of organization and the kind of decision to be made determine whether it is better to use a group or individual decision-making process.
From the Paper
"...it is sometimes difficult to ascertain who's the boss or the leader. Imagine there being a football team without the head coach, or a marching band without a drum major. Those things can be in existence without the head coach and the drum major, but I guarantee that those entities will not be able to stay afloat for even a short period of time. It is imperative that the group come to a general consensus about who the spokesperson or leader for the group will be. Doing this will alleviate a lot of stress and eliminate the ambiguity in the group's assignments."
| |
|
Strategic Decision Making, 2005.
This discussion investigates strategic decision-making in project management organizations, focusing on the World Bank and UNESCO.
25,514 words (approx. 102.1 pages), 45 sources, MLA, £ 178.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The research explores how corporations or organizations make strategic decisions in project management. The investigation focuses on organizations such as the World Bank and UNESCO providing a comparison of these two entities. Tje paper explains how the World Bank makes special use of the project life cycle which is composed of eight phases: Country assistance strategies, identification, preparation, appraisal, negotiation and board approval, implementation and supervision, implementation and completion and evaluation. It shos how the World Bank relies on various strategies and the board of directors in the decision making process. On the other hand, the paper explains how UNESCO relies on the general conference and the bureau of strategic planning to make decisions for the organization. Project management is specialized for each project. It also includes an objective and goal for each aspect of the organization. A SWOT analysis is made for both organizations. The discussion focuses on the key factors involved in making decisions. The research indicates the importance of feasibility studies for both organizations and the success of the projects that have been implemented. The literature review discusses project management, product management, benchmarking, strategic marketing and other components of strategic planning. In addition, the research investigates strategic decision-making as it relates to human resources including team training and the characteristics of a project manager. The strategies and marketing aspects of the organizational strategies are also investigated. Finally, the discussion focuses on future studies in areas of strategic decision-making and project management.
Outline
Abstract
Executive Summary
Chapter I
Introduction of Topic
Introduction
Background
Conclusion
Chapter II
Comparison of the World Bank (International Bank) and UNESCO
Introduction
On What Basis do Corporations or Companies Make Strategic Decisions in Project Management?
World Bank (International Bank)
Strategic Decision-Making and Project Management
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Weaknesses
Limited Scope of Operations
Opportunities
Threats
Conclusion (World Bank)
UNESCO
Strategic Decision Making
Education
Objectives
Natural Sciences
Information Systems and Communication
Objectives
Social and Human Sciences
SWOT Analysis
Conclusion (UNESCO)
Man-made Limitations
Seasonal Factors
Institutional Factors
Comparison of Feasibility Studies between the World Bank and UNIDO
UNIDO
Successfulness of Projects
Chapter II Conclusion
Chapter III
Literature Review
Introduction
Strategic Management
Project Management and Strategic Decision Making
Project Management
Strategic Decision Making
Project Managers and Project Teams
The Role of Product Innovation and Development
Creativity
Benchmarking
Strategic Marketing and Planning
Chapter III Conclusion
Chapter IV Future Studies
Introduction
Future Studies
Chapter IV Conclusion
Chapter V
Discussion& Conclusion
Introduction
Discussion
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Strategic Decision Making has long been a part of the corporate culture. The need for strategic decision-making became evident after World War II; this will be discussed in detail in the literature review. Strategic decision-making is also essential because most organizations are now using project teams to complete certain tasks. Therefore, the ability of managers to make strategic decisions is important. In recent years, project management has become increasingly more popular. In addition, the importance of strategic decision-making has become more prominent. The development of new ideas and concepts has led many organizations to seek out project managers to implement the new innovative projects properly. There is evidence to suggest there is a shortage of project managers, which is a reflection of the changing corporate environment. To combat this shortage of project managers many business schools have begun to offer specializations in project management."
| |
|
Decision-Making, 2002.
An examination of the three major theories decision-making.
2,650 words (approx. 10.6 pages), 10 sources, £ 69.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides an examination of the modern theories of decision- making. In this paper, the term decision-making refers to the process of achieving a desired outcome or outcomes through a group, rather than through the motions of an individual or a group. The implication of an analysis of group decision- making process is therefore extremely useful in respect to business strategies and social dynamics. This paper examines the decision- making process through addressing the origins and history of decision- making, as well as three specific examples of decision- making.
| |
|
PMI Decision-Making Tool.
This paper discusses Edward de Bono's Plus/Minus/Interesting (PMI) decision-making technique, which can help managers to effectively improve their decision-making.
1,015 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 5 sources, APA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that planning using the PMI technique (1) gives managers a standard of measurement, thus allowing managers to determine if goals are being met; (2) helps managers to transform values and beliefs into specific coherent actions; and (3) allows limited resources like budgets and human resources to be committed in the most efficient manner. The author points out that, in the PMI technique, the T-chart is divided into three sections: plus (good points), minus (negative points), and interesting sections (points that are neither specifically good nor bad, but applicable, interesting, or have extended implications for the decision). The paper relates that the PMI may not be especially useful when a manager has few or no prejudices regarding a specific decision and already has a broad and nonjudgmental understanding of the problem; when a manager has strong existing biases, the PMI is especially useful.
From the Paper
"Small and large businesses, for profit and non-profit organizations, high technology and manufacturing businesses all require good decisions to be viable and successful. Further, in today's fast-paced and complex business environment, managers are often faced with difficult and sometimes seemingly unsolvable problems. As such, managers require decision making tools and techniques that are effective across a wide variety of situations. The Plus/Minus/Interesting (PMI) decision-making technique is one of most valuable and simple tools that managers can use to make effective decisions. Developed by Edward de Bono in his 1982 book, de Bono's Thinking Course, the PMI is essentially a thinking tool (PMI Edward de Bono's) that amplifies and improves on the common pro and con lists that many people devise."
| |
|
Strategic Decision Making, 2007.
This paper investigates how senior management influences peers to adopt cultural change within a decision-making context.
5,854 words (approx. 23.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 100.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reveals that the strategic decision-making process is an essential part of the success of a company. The paper looks at factors such as risk tolerance and cultural background that influence the decision. The paper explains that risk tolerance is used to measure how many risks a business is willing to assume in the carrying out of organizational goals. The paper explores the role that cultural background plays in the decision-making process and shows how in certain cultures, the decision-making process can almost be predicted based on the cultural norms of the society. The paper concludes that that risk tolerances and cultural background influence the decision- making process of senior managers.
Outline:
Introduction
Strategic Decision Making and its Importance
Risk Tolerance
Cultural Background
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Strategic decision making is what separates successful companies form companies that are not successful. At every level of management that are decisions that must be made to ensure that the company is performing in the manner that it is capable of. With this being understood senior mangers have a unique responsibility in that the decisions that they make impact the decisions that lower level managers make which in turn affects the performance and direction of an entire company. As a result of this cause and effect relationship it is also essential that the strategic decisions that are being made are in congruence with the strategic goals and objectives that have already been established by the company."
| |
|
Decision-Making Process, 2004.
An analysis of how personal, organizational, and cultural values can affect the decision-making process.
848 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Whether they are personal, organizational, or cultural values, these values not only define ethically acceptable boundaries for the decision-making process, but also steer the individual towards the most socially accepted decision. Given this significance, the paper discusses how cultural values affect the decision-making process. The paper explores the relationship between organizational values and personal values and investigates how this affects decision-making and organizational commitment. Finally, the paper examines an example of how core values in the United States Air Force affect decision-making for its troops .
From the Paper
"Finegan (2000) investigated the relationship between organizational and personal values and how these affected the decision-making process, as well as organizational commitment. Both employees and organizations share one fundamental characteristic, ?values?. These evaluative standards are used to discern between ?right? and ?wrong? or to assess the importance of preferences. It is not surprising that an employee would be more comfortable working in an environment that is consistent and supportive of his or her own personal values. And, as anticipated, through the use of hierarchical multiple regression analyses, Finegan found that an employee?s perception of organizational values positively affected their commitment level. When personal values align with organizational values, the employee is typically more devoted and more productive. However, in addition to this commitment level, aligned values positively affect the decision-making process as well, which also positively affects productivity."
| |
|
Decision Making in the Workplace, 2004.
Evaluates different deployments of the rational and organizational decision making approaches in the same workplace scenario.
937 words (approx. 3.7 pages), 2 sources, APA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
One of the key aspects to being a good manager is being a good decision maker and a good facilitator of decision making between others. However, although this statement may seem to be a cliche, like so many cliches about demonstrating strong leadership and business acumen, it bears a certain level of scrutiny when put into real world terms. This paper asks what happens when one must negotiate and mediate in the real world. It shows that, in these cases, there are two dominant paradigms every business manager must take into consideration, namely, what is economically feasible and good business sense, and what is ethically coherent with the company?s philosophy and American law. This paper applies two available decision making models that satisfy both of these aspects, the rational actor decision-making model and the organizational processes decision-making model.
From the Paper
"In other words, quite often decision making in the work force cannot presume that all conflicts have a rational basis, or that all mediate decisions made thusly can simply regard the quantitative and qualitative data that may be at the roots of a particular conflict. Decisions may ideally come from identifying relevant criteria, cause and effect beliefs, and different evaluations of proposed alternatives. However, if even from a purely rational basis conflict may result in all three areas, when conflicts in the workplace assume because of long-standing tensions, human resource management becomes even more difficult in achieving decisions that are mutually amicable for all parties."
| |
|
Non-Profit Organizations and Decision-Making, 2008.
An analysis of decision-making and leadership skills in a non-profit organization.
3,507 words (approx. 14.0 pages), 22 sources, APA, £ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper analyzes how better decision-making can assist non-profit organizations. It discusses the areas of systems thinking, action research and intergovernmental relations with respect to decision making in non-profit organizations. The paper then looks at these issues in terms of theory, research and practice for the organizations.
Outline:
Action Research And Decision Making
Decision Making And Systems Thinking
Leadership
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Additionally, evaluating systems or taking action based on the results of research supports the function of the organizational leader as a "hands-on" element of the company. When the leader is also a manager, this "hands-on" approach is supported by a thorough understanding of the issues that impact non-profits and the resolutions that may be required to achieve the optimal results. The research indicates, therefore, that throughout the business world leaders are a significant factor in the success of the organization. In the non-profit sector, however, manager-leaders are preferred because of the combination of professional traits that will support the ability to overcome obstacles identified in relation to the organization. The research also indicates that two important functions of leaders are to facilitate action in response to issues and to motivate stakeholders to support those actions on a continual basis. Both action research and systems thinking allows effective manager-leaders to take action that leads to accurate decisions, while at the same time ensuring that there is widespread support of those decisions by all organizational entities."
|
|
|
