| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "GREEK CIVIL WAR": |
|
|
The Greek Civil War, 2008.
A discussion of the Greek Civil War and its devastating effects on the nation, as well as its significance in the international geopolitical realm.
1,550 words (approx. 6.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the Greek Civil War which, in one form or another, ravaged Greece from roughly 1942 to 1949. In particular, the paper looks at the human and social toll of the war and also the geopolitical and international dimensions of the conflict as it raged on contemporaneously with the Second World War and then, later, with the early years of the Cold War. In the final analysis, the Greek Civil War exacted a terrible toll upon the people of Greece while, at the same time, made Greece one of the "hot-spots" in a much larger war between the world's two reigning superpowers.
From the Paper
"From a social point-of-view, the Greek Civil War was a tragedy to the people of that land. The war tore apart families, razed villages, literally wiped out some communities, and tore at the fabric binding together Greeks of all political persuasions. More than that, the Greek Civil War, in the years from 1946 to 1949 when the conflict was at its worst - featuring as it did brutal and unrelenting warfare between the communist-controlled Democratic Army of Greece and the British and US-backed Greek National Army - about 80,000 people were killed and approximately 700,000 were forced to flee their homes - all this in a nation of only seven million souls (Clogg, 164). During the final phase of the war, in the late 1940s, Greek citizens residing in Northern Greece - especially along the Albanian and Yugoslavian borders - saw their villages over-run by government forces during the day and by partisans during the night. Furthermore, the Royal Greek Air Force bombed these communities at the same time as inhabitants were forced into the Democratic Army. Needless to say, many of these communities never recovered, with those civilians who survived the bloody warfare escaping to Europe or to North America to find better lives for themselves (Danforth, 174)."
| |
|
Greek Civil War, 1991.
This paper reviews the national and international causes of the Greek civil war, events leading up to war, motivations of communist guerillas and Western-backed government and the outcome.
2,250 words (approx. 9.0 pages), 8 sources, £ 56.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
'The Greek civil war was, in many respects, the first episode in the Cold War; the first of many civil wars in the less-developed world between Communist movements and Western-backed governments. It was thus the first "test case" for the U.S. struggle against Communist guerilla movements in the Third World.
The civil war actually began in the Greek countryside nearly two years before World War II itself ended, as rival resistance movements clashed. At the beginning, the supporting power on the Western side was Britain, not the United States--indeed, the United States held itself sharply and critically aloof from British policy in the early phases of the conflict . The Soviets, for their part, seem never to have taken an active part.
But by 1947, Greece would become the centerpiece of the ... "
| |
|
Spanish and Greek Civil Wars, 2005.
Compares these two twentieth-century civil wars and discusses the intervention of foreign powers.
1,876 words (approx. 7.5 pages), 6 sources, APA, £ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Spanish Civil War developed during the 1930s as a conflict between major social and economic interests, specifically the landowning class (supported by the military) and the peasant and working class (that was ill-treated by both). The paper shows that in Greece, by contrast, the tensions were not as deep and the sides might have worked out their problems, had not a succession of outside interventions taken place. Both conflicts were protracted and highly damaging to the economies of each country and to human lives. The paper explains that both conflicts also produced a long-standing, right-wing government that repressed opposition and prevented democratic reforms for many years. The political consequences continue to some extent to this day.
From the Paper
"The landowners benefited from easy profits from farming and had control of huge estates, a result of the sale of Church land and communal lands by the state in the nineteenth century. One result was the creation of a huge mass of landless workers living on low wages and facing a political system controlled by the landowners. The only way peasants could see change would be through land reform. Another source of instability was the economic depression of the 1930s. It was during this period, as tensions increased between workers and landowners, that there was an increase in left-wing union membership, with the Socialist Party in particular gaining members."
| |
|
Ancient Greek Civilization, 2003.
An exploration of the origins, rise and decline of the Greek civilization.
5,290 words (approx. 21.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 96.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the origins, rise and decline of the Greek civilization, beginning with the first Olympic Games and ending with the dawn of the Roman Empire. It expands on all facets of the ancient Greek culture.
From the Paper
"It is no doubt impossible to overstate how profoundly ancient Greek civilization has impacted modern Western society. Providing the first known models of participatory democracy, construing philosophical concepts that have roused debate for two and a half million ..."
| |
|
The Greeks and Modern Civilization, 2004.
An exploration of how the Greeks contributed to modern civilization in many different areas.
2,468 words (approx. 9.9 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 53.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses how three of the greatest contributions to modern Western society from the Greek civilization are democratic government, individual rights, and rational thought. This paper examines this ancient culture through the eyes of many contemporary great minds, such as Thucydides, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, and Pythagoras. It also includes a focus on the works of great historian, Victor Hanson.
From the Paper
"In almost every Greek play, when the story is stripped of its unique primary characters, there are inevitably the average citizens who provide an essential element to the drama. They are not rich aristocrats, nor are they the stupid clowns. They are the pieces that allow the everyday viewer to relate to the play. These benchmark characters allow the commoner to truly see and compare the faults of the extremely wealthy. This recurring theme of anti-aristocracy presents itself in writings from Homer through Sophocles and is reflected in the faith and support for the ?middle-class? that has become so crucial to modern democracy."
| |
|
Understanding Roman Civilization through Greek Literature, 2000.
A look at how ancient Roman civilization can be analyzed through the literary works "The Aeneid", "The Iliad" and the "Odyssey."
3,223 words (approx. 12.9 pages), 3 sources, £ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"Rome, throughout history, can be described by its unique openness to the ideas of different civilizations and cultures. The Aeneid, by Virgil, exemplifies clearly the incorporation of other civilizations? literature and heritage into mainstream Roman society. The Aeneid is very strongly linked to the epic works of Homer: the Iliad and the Odyssey. The Romans conquered the Greek people in 146 AD, but instead of destroying their culture they digested Greek words and writings to make them their own. Since Virgil went so far as to imitate the Homer?s Odyssey and Iliad in the Aeneid, it can be seen as direct evidence of Rome?s assimilation of the Greek people, and their culture."
| |
|
The Persian Wars and Greek Society, 2003.
A look at how the Persian Wars acted as a fulcrum and incentive for change within Greek society.
3,870 words (approx. 15.5 pages), 12 sources, APA, £ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores how the Persian Wars changed the society of the Greeks, with a special focus on Athens. It attempts to compare the Archaic and Classical periods socially and culturally by using the Persian War as the fulcrum between Archaic and Classical. It also addresses the Persian War as the instigator of resistance that prompted changes within the classical period. It examines the changes in politics, art, literature, economics and intra-poleis relations.
Outline
Democratic Expansion
'Poliscentrism' vs. Imperialism ? The Athenian Empire
Economics ? Money, Money Makes a Man
The Progression of the Arts: The ?Explosive? Archaic and the ?Golden Age?
?There is No Growth Without Resistance? ? A Conclusion
From the Paper
"The reforms of Solon did little to advance democratic rights for the Athenians, whilst he certainly took the first step in ending debt-bondage, it can hardly be considered a leaping bound for democracy. In 508 BC, Cleisthenes reorganised political groupings into a great number of tribes so as to break the strength of the clans. Cleisthenes then set about embedding main constitutional power in the Assembly; in spite of this the check of power was still held by elected archons and those of the Areopagus who were almost always of the aristocratic elite. The limitation on how far democracy was allowed to go was always in place. The Archaic Period in regards to the fulfilment or expansion of democracy, and certainly in comparison to the changes to be made in the Classical Period was more the planting of a seed - that would be later cultivated by Pericles."
| |
|
The Greek Art of War, 2005.
Application of Sun Tzu's 'Art of War' to Xerxes' invasion of Greece.
2,305 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 50.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents an examination of the military strategy employed by the Greek and Persian armies during Xerxes' invasion of Greece in the 4th century BC. Sun Tzu's 'Art of War' is used as the basis for analysis and critique of the strategies employed by both sides. The paper discusses two major battles during the invasion- Thermopylae and Plataea.
From the Paper
"More than two thousand years ago, a Chinese strategist known as Sun Tzu wrote one of the enduring classics of military theory. Most likely written during a period of Chinese history referred to as the 'Warring States' period, Sun Tzu's The Art of War has continued to be studied by military strategists for millennia. Even today, The Art of War is required reading for Naval Officer Candidates. At nearly the same time in the fourth century B.C., the Greek city-states were facing invasion from the mighty Persian army. Vastly outnumbered, the Greeks eventually triumphed by defeating their enemies at Plataea, but not before fighting one of history's greatest military stands at Thermopylae. By using Sun Tzu's classic text to analyze the battles of Thermopylae and Plataea, it is possible to gain a better understanding not only of the battles themselves, but also of the reasons why The Art of War has remained such an influential and respected text over the centuries."
| |
|
Habeas Corpus - Civil Liberty or Civil Right, 2008.
An analysis of civil liberties and civil rights and which of them applies to habeas corpus.
3,137 words (approx. 12.5 pages), 15 sources, APA, £ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the origins and history of habeas corpus, from its roots that predate the Magna Carta through to the present day, where it is being employed to the benefit of hundreds that wrongly languish in prison. The paper also explains the distinction between civil right and civil liberty and discusses which applies to habeas corpus. Lastly, the paper looks at the historic ups and downs of habeas corpus and discusses its unique place in the Constitution, separate from provisions contained in the Bill of Rights.
From the Paper
"Rights and liberties need to be at their strongest when public support is at its weakest. Civil rights are decreed by law, civil liberties are God given, and the actions of legislatures are inevitably governed by the politics of the time. Habeas corpus is a civil liberty included among the "self evident truths" of the Declaration of Independence, and alone one of the civil liberties that can be suspended by acts of the government during times of crisis. The president judged by history as one of the best, sought to suspend these liberties in time of extreme crisis in the nation's young history. It was circumvented to increase support during a world war, to intern "dangerous" citizens during another, and to grant due process rights to perpetrators of the war for the new millennium. It is now freeing hundred of wrongly convicted people of a crime. The future of habeas corpus is uncertain in the short term, but solid in the future as all inalienable rights bestowed upon the common man by his creator."
| |
|
Roman and Greek Homosexuality, 2002.
Explores and compares the differing opinions of ancient Greek and Roman civilizations on the issue of homosexuality.
650 words (approx. 2.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Ancient civilizations have had a diverse history in respect to homosexuality. Two of the most dominant civilizations of the early Western civilizations were also quite different in how they perceived homosexuality. The Greeks saw a loving, often sexual, relationship between an older man and a younger man or boy to be a nurturing part of citizen-building. The Romans, however, perceived all sex and all male behavior as an opportunity for establishing domination over others. While both cultures accepted homosexuality to differing degrees and for different reasons, it was during the course of the Roman Empire that homosexuality became more frequently unacceptable in an increasing number of contexts. It is the purpose of this paper to examine the differences between Greek and Roman homosexuality.
| |
|
The "Elgin Marbles": Greek Property in British Museums, 2003.
An examination of the "Elgin Marbles", ancient Parthenon figures that were claimed by British archaeologists in the 18th century during Greek civil strife, and the debate over whether or not they should be returned to Greece.
3,175 words (approx. 12.7 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 65.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines the controversy that exists over the "Elgin Marbles", which were originally part of the Greek Parthenon's frieze, that were taken by Lord Elgin of England in the late 18th century. The paper takes the position that the statues and other artifacts which currently are housed in English museums, are the rightful property of the Greek people and should be returned to Greece. The paper is divided into several sections. The first gives a history of the Elgin Marbles and how they came into possession of the English in the first place. A brief history of the Parthenon is also given in this section, with a detailed examination of the architecture and the ancient politics that surrounded its construction. The paper then spans the history of the Parthenon up until the 18th century, including the building losing its roof and several architectural designs due to the Ottoman Turks using it as an armory during their control of Greece. The paper discusses how British archaeologists claimed the pieces in the 1800s, fearful that the Greeks could not maintain such classical pieces of work. The paper ends with a section discussing the latest improvements that are underway in Greece to house the "Elgin Marbles" if an international agreement can be reached that will send the pieces of the Parthenon back to Athens. The concept of Greek pride and honor in their ancient ancestry is discussed and how originally, when Greece was unable to maintain such pieces, the idea to keep them in England was the correct decision to be made.
From the Paper
"The mere thought of The Parthenon evokes an image of dignity and pride for not only the current Greek citizens who look upon their ancient ancestors with honor, but for the entirety of Western civilization who view The Parthenon as a representation of the greatness that can be achieved by Western culture. Using this Western concept of pride as a basis, it is clear to see why the British government has its roots in claiming that the treasures of the Parthenon would be better served in a more upscale environment such as The British Museum rather then an unfinished Acropolis museum in Athens. Nevertheless, the removal of The Parthenon artifacts, which are known as The Elgin Marbles since the works of art were "purchased" by the English noble Lord Thomas Bruce of Elgin in 1801, was in essence an infraction upon the Greek populace's right to their ancestors' culture. In large part due to the importance of The Parthenon and the culture that it represents to Greece, the rightful place of the Elgin Marbles is in Athens where the pieces of architecture were always intended to remain when they were completed. "
| |
|
Greek Diaspora, 1996.
Historical overview of emigration as essential feature of Greek civilization. War, assimilation, Hellenism, in U.S., religion & language.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 7 sources, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"A diaspora is a dispersal or migration of a population and a culture from a central place to other parts of the world. The most famous diaspora, known as the Diaspora, was the migration of the Jewish people to regions outside the original settlement in Palestine, and much of Jewish history since that time has been an attempt to bring as many of the Jewish people as possible back to their homeland, to their Promised Land. A Greek diaspora has been under way for centuries, extending back to the era of Hellenistic culture. During much of the history of the last two thousand years, there have been thriving Greek communities in different parts of the world, all maintaining certain Greek traditions and looking back to the Greek homeland as the source of its culture and strength. There also was no Greek state for centuries so that the diaspora had the same goal as the Jewish..."
| |
|
Greek Mythology: Women in Greek Life, 2002.
Examining the way in which women were depicted in classic Greek mythology.
1,025 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discuss and analyzes the topic of Greek mythology. Specifically, it contains an analysis of the role of women in Greek life as depicted in literature. It discusses how women underwent a tremendous change between the time of Homer and that of Aristophanes four hundred years later, as five different plays clearly illustrate. Early Greek women were one-dimensional and needy, while four hundred years later they were feminists complaining about their sex lives.
From the Paper
"Women in Greek life are portrayed in a wide variety of ways, and they did indeed change between Homer's type and Aristophanes' time. Homer often portrays women as scheming to keep men from performing their duty, such as how Calypso holds Ulysses on her island in "The Odyssey," attempting to keep her with him rather than allow him to return to his home and family. "This daughter of Atlas has got hold of poor unhappy Ulysses, and keeps trying by every kind of blandishment to make him forget his home, so that he is tired of life, and thinks of nothing but how he may once more see the smoke of his own chimneys" (Odyssey, Book I). In the Iliad, Homer continues to portray women as one-dimensional beings without feelings when he has Chryseis, the daughter of Chryses given as a war prize to Agamemnon as his share of the looting and subsequently ransomed by her father."
| |
|
Mark Mazower's "After the War was Over", 2006.
A critical review of Mark Mazower's 'When the War was Over: Reconstructing the Family Nation and State in Greece 1943-1950'.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is a critical analysis of Mark Mazower's collection of papers. 'When the War was Over: Reconstructing the Family Nation and State in Greece 1943-1950', provides an overview of the Greek Civil War that began as the Nazi occupation began to loosen its hold. It serves as an account of basic communists and nationalist divisions, British role in SOE training for main communist resistance movement, and others' Cold War ambitions, and the Truman Protocol of 1947 that brought peace and aid to Greece but shaped successive governments in the need to comply with Western strategic aims.
From the Paper
"The Nazis rolled into Greece in the spring of 1941, prompting almost 10 years of sometimes severe political violence. In Mark Mazower's After the War was Over, his approach resembles what appears in his other works on Greek and also, Balkan history. In the collection of papers discussed, here, there is a definite point of view and depth that Mazower has tried to impart. The British Special Operations Executive (SOE) trained Greek underground groups towards attacks on the Nazi forces so that Greece's Civil War involved SOE-trained communist guerrillas in conflict with the state forces."
|
|
|
