| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "GREAT DEPRESSION 1929 1941": |
|
|
The Great Depression: 1929-1941, 2006.
This paper focuses on two major economic movements that took place in the U.S. during the Depression era between the years 1929-1941 and their impact on the American people and the economy.
3,345 words (approx. 13.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 68.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines author Robert McElvaine's book "The Great Depression: America 1929-1941," which centers on two specific economic movements: Progressivism and the New Deal. Progressivism was, in effect, an expansive ideal about what the U.S. should be to its own citizens and to the impending globalization. The New Deal was a desirable strategy for most Americans to combat the effects of the Depression. This paper details the similarities of both movements which favored the ideas and ideals of American values. The writer also compares the present status of the U.S. government and economy to that of the depression era.
Table of Contents:
Progressivism
The New Deal
Progressivism and the New Deal: Comparisons and Differences
Works Cited
From the Paper
"Both movements favored the ideas and ideals of some sort of American values. Just as the progressives movement was founded not only with both moral and economic values as guide posts, and saw World War I as "the last and greatest example of the progressive spirit of sacrifice, so the New Deal began with individuals having to (mostly gladly) sacrifice some of their individualism for government-run and controlled works and policies determined to avoid sinking further into an economic sinkhole. We can also see similarities in the fact that the values and the eventual legislation formed a trickle-down philosophy, from the upper middle and upper classes to benefit the less-fortunate. We have to remember that President Wilson as well as FDR were "patricians"- in the best sense of the word, and their aim was to protect the citizens of this nation from war and from economic disaster, even if it meant a sacrifice and even an attempt to undo the Constitutional balance of power."
| |
|
The Great Depression (1929-1939), 2002.
The paper looks at different overviews of the Great Depression by three authors of American history, (P. Johnson, G. B. Tindall and D. E. Shi, and H. Zinn).
1,176 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the differences in coverage of the Great Depression in three general American history books. The paper describes Johnson's book as elitist, by not mentioning the effect of the depression on the average American. It also explains that Zinn's book does not dedicate many pages to the Depression decade, although it does focus on the woes of those hardest hit. The paper analyzes how Tindall and Shi focus on the government's role in overcoming at least the human misery of the Depression. It also talks about the shortcomings of each of the books.
From the Paper
"Howard Zinn explains at least the beginning of the Depression -- that is, the Wall Street crash as due to the fact that ?it came directly from wild speculation which collapsed and brought the whole economy down with it? (Zinn, 1995, p. 377). Zinn puts the blame on the inability of the government and the economy to support a strong capitalist system: ?the capitalist system was by its nature unsound: a system driven by the one overriding motive of corporate profit and therefore unstable, unpredictable, and blind to human needs? (Zinn, 1995, p.377-8)."
| |
|
The Great Depression, 2000.
This paper studies the causes and effects of the great depression which took place in 1929 in the United States, describing the unemployment, hardship, hunger and despair of that time.
1,535 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 10 sources, APA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies the political, social, and economic factors that brought on the great depression in 1929 in the United States. It gives a historical overview of the situation before the outbreak of the great depression and the part that World War I played in causing it. The author feels that many people believe that the stock market crash of 1929 caused the great depression, but this is not true. He also finds that many people believed that President Roosevelt?s New Deal ended the great depression, but this is also not completely factual. According to the author, historical facts show that the stock market crash was the beginning of the great depression but that political, social, and economic problems were the real causes. Also, historical evidence shows that The New Deal helped the recovery but that the United States' entry into World War II was the main reason that the great depression ended.
From the Paper
"This is one of the most famous songs of The Great Depression, a time beginning in 1929 and lasting until 1940. This was a time of unemployment, hardship, hunger, and despair. Many people believe that the stock market crash of 1929 caused the Great Depression, but this is not true. Many people also believe that President Roosevelt?s New Deal ended the Great Depression, but this is also not completely factual. The historical facts show that the stock market crash was the beginning of the Great Depression but that political, social, and economic problems were the real causes. Also, historical evidence shows that The New Deal helped the recovery but that the United States entering into World War II was the main reason that the Great Depression ended."
| |
|
Thr Great Depression in the U.S., 2002.
Analysis of the Great Depression of 1929-1939.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 3 sources, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Analysis of the Great Depression of 1929-1939. Speculatin on causes as depicted in three books. Lack of government regulations on business, market speculators, Capitalist system. Government's role in overcoming the Depression. Social welfare initiatives. The New Deal programs of President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Emergence of black voters & transfer of political loyalty from Republican to Democrat. Contends there is no satisfactory answer to why the Depression lasted as long as it did.
From the Paper
"Three Views of the Great Depression in the U.S.
Paul Johnson, in his A History of the American People calls the Depression and its length as "mysterious". He is not the only one to try to figure out what happened and why and how, but what he begins his Depression era chapter with is: "What is puzzling about the events of the decade of 1929-39 is the continuing severity of the market falls and the length and obstinacy of the Depression" (Johnson, 1997, p. 727). While he explains that America, in the Twenties tended to let business run their own arrangements without much, if any, government regulation or impediments. American business was pro5tected by high tariff, instituted by pro-business Republican Presidents. So, what happened? The villain, Johnson implies, is inflation that was allowed to run wild. And, a surprising fact, the 1920s "growing"..."
| |
|
Political Factors in the Severity of the Great Depression, 1992.
An examination of the arguments presented by Charles Kindleberger in his book "The World Depression: 1929-1939". He argues that extent of Great Depression was due to British inability and U.S. unwillingness, to assume responsibility for stabilizing the in
2,925 words (approx. 11.7 pages), 12 sources, £ 73.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The Role of Political Factors in the Severity of the Great Depression
Charles Kindleberger, in The World in Depression: 1929-1939, has essentially argued that there is no single explanatory cause for the Great Depression. However, he has stressed the fact that the reason the 1929 downturn was so wide, so deep, and so long was because the international economic system was rendered unstable due to British inability and U.S. unwillingness to assume responsibility for stabilizing it (Kindleberger, 1973, pp. 291-308). Thus, Kindleberger introduces into the cauldron of conflicting interpretations of the causes of the Great Depression the international political dimension: the appropriate leadership role of a great nation in..."
| |
|
The Great Depression, 2008.
This paper discusses the factors, which caused the Great Depression of the 1930s in the United States.
1,095 words (approx. 4.4 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although many people believed that the stock market crash was the cause of the Great Depression, many other factors played a role in bringing about this depression. The author points out that one of the causes was the maldistribution of wealth. The paper states that a second factor was a lack of diversification in the American economy in the 1920s. The author stresses that a third major problem was the credit structure of the economy, which put farmers deeply in dept. The paper relates that declining exports and the unstable international debt structure also influenced the coming of the Great Depression. The author underscores that the speculative boom in the stock market was based upon confidence; whereas, the huge market crash of 1929 was based on fear.
From the Paper
"During the 1920s, the share of the national income going to families in the upper-income increased. Tax policies contributed to this concentration of wealth by lowering personal income tax rates, eliminating the wartime excess-profits tax, and increasing deductions that favored affluent individuals and corporations. In 1929, the poorest forty percent of the population received only twelve and a half percent of aggregate family income, whereas the wealthiest five percent received thirty percent. Moreover, for an economy to function properly, demand must equal supply."
| |
|
Cause and Effect of the Great Depression, 2004.
This paper details some of the causes and effects of the Great Depression.
1,854 words (approx. 7.4 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The Great Depression refers to the serious economic decline that started in the United States towards the end of 1929 and spread to most industrial countries of the world, lasting until the early 1940s.The period saw sharp declines in the production and sale of goods and a sudden, severe rise in unemployment. Numerous businesses and banks closed down or went bankrupt, people lost their jobs, homes, and savings, and large sections of the population in hitherto prosperous countries had to depend on charity to survive. Economists have discussed and dissected the causes of the Depression ever since, and its long-term effects have not even been fully overcome even today. This paper discusses some of the important causes and effects of the Great Depression.
From the Paper
"The end of the World War I saw the American nation withdraw towards an inward looking policy of heightened individualism and the single-minded pursuit of getting rich. New technological innovations in the modern industry enabled quantum increase in industrial productivity. Unrestrained consumerism was promoted through the newly acquired art of advertising. People were persuaded to buy new, attractive products such as the automobile, the radio and household appliances. The problem was that while the public could be easily seduced into abandoning their habits of saving and frugality, the majority of the American public did not have the required buying capacity due to great inequalities in incomes. For example, during the ?roaring? twenties (between 1923 and 1929), manufacturing output per person-hour increased by 32 %, while workers? wages grew by only 8 %. (McElvaine 38) At the same time, massive tax-cuts were initiated to benefit the rich by the government."
| |
|
America's Great Depression, 2002.
A discussion of the social and economic problems resulting from the 1929 stock market crash which led to the Great Depression.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 3 sources, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses the social and economic problems resulting from the 1929 stock market crash which led to the Great Depression. What went wrong with the American economy & its underlying weakness at the time of the crash. Political ramifications including widening gulf between Democrats & Republicans regarding government responsibility to its poor citizens. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal legislation to help the unemployed, create system of social security for workers. Accomplishments of the New Deal.
From the Paper
"The Great Depression: American Watershed
When the Roaring Twenties came to an unpleasant end with the Wall Street Crash and resultant unemployment, poverty, and the failure of businesses and banks, the Great Depression made one thing very clear: unchecked Capitalism cannot survive without the danger of serious economic consequences.
Many Americans, until the end of the Twenties, thought that getting rich was the solution to everything. There were the rich and the super-rich, and those wanting to be rich. And then, in 1929, on that Black Friday, America would collapse down into somber reality. Worthless stocks couldn?t buy bread. America the greedy, in 1929, turned into America the needy.
There are many people who still today tend to blame Herbert Hoover for causing the depression. This is simply not accurate."
| |
|
The Great Depression, 2004.
An analysis of the origins of the "Great Depression" and the lessons that should be learned from it.
2,795 words (approx. 11.2 pages), 8 sources, MLA, £ 59.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the period of history known as the "Great Depression", following the crash of the stock market in 1929. The paper contends that the lessons learned from the "Great Depression" should be that governments bear a responsibility to see to it that institutions affecting the public are properly run and managed and that individual human beings are protected against the accidents of human error by some sort of government-sponsored safety net.
From the Paper
"For the past seventy-five years, historians and economists have argued over what brought on this madness. Indeed, the science of macroeconomics was created in large part because of this single event. What was particularly unusual about the Great Depression, as opposed to other "panics" or economic calamities was its worldwide scope. Virtually every country in the world was affected by that fateful stock market crash, and in exceedingly similar ways. Among the theories that attempt to explain this phenomenon are various hypotheses relating to the classic arguments of supply and demand: aggregate demand as related to the Gold Standard and world money supplies, and aggregate supply as related the failure of world economies to adjust to nominal monetary shocks. Prior to the 1930s, most of the world?s nations operated according to the gold standard; a small number according to the silver standard. In response to the catastrophic failures induced by the events of late 1929, most countries eventually removed themselves from these standards."
| |
|
Three Histories of the Great Depression, 2004.
Examines works by Howard Zinn, Paul Johnson, and the team of George Brown Tindall and David Emory Shi to show how different historians present the Great Depression.
1,234 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
One of the key historical events of the 20th century was known as the Great Depression. This paper discusses the views of several historians - Howard Zinn, Paul Johnson, and George Brown Tindall/David Emory Shi. All agree on the general dates of the event, on its beginning in 1929 with the Stock Market crash and on the fact that the Roosevelt Administration, which was elected to do something about the economy, used the New Deal as a way of addressing this issue. All produced general histories of the United States for the average reader rather than the specialist, and all have found an audience for their books. The paper shows, however, that the three works do show differences in how they view these events and in how they write about them. These differences are discussed in the paper.
Works Reviewed
Howard Zinn's "A People's History of the United States"
George Brown Tindell and David Emory Shi's "America: A Narrative History".
Paul Johnson's "A History of the American People"
From the Paper
"Tindall and Shi also give more attention to the efforts Hoover made to bring about a recovery, and to the fact that his failure led to the end of his administration and the election of Roosevelt as a way of changing the leadership and so addressing the problem with a new team. They also provide more detail on the way Congress reacted. Their book is more detailed than Zinn's, for he seeks to explain broader historical trends, while Tindall and Shi give their attention to specific events in a more detailed fashion."
| |
|
?The Great Crash 1929?, 2002.
A review of the book ?The Great Crash 1929? by John Kenneth Galbraith.
1,047 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper shows how in his book "The Great Crash 1929", John Kenneth Galbraith, a leading economist, examines the meaning of the stock market crash of 1929 which has become a persistent fear for Wall Street ever since. It looks at the events leading up to the crash and details the aftermath. It compares recent downturns in the market today to the Great Crash and discusses how a crash such as the one that occurred in 1929 is simply impossible given the current structure of the market and of governmental and other controls. It analyzes how Galbraith finds that what happened in 1929 was not an isolated action and that earlier in history there had been other speculative splurges, beginning in 1637 when Dutch speculators invested in tulip bulbs.
From the Paper
"There were events prior to the Great Crash showing that the market might draw back. Galbraith cites one such in June of 1928 when in fact the death of the bull market was predicted, but this prediction was premature. Herbert Hoover would be elected President in 1929, and he had been concerned about the rising tide of speculation for some time. When he was Secretary of Commerce, he had tried to get the market under control. His attitude was kept secret, however, so his election did not cause the panic it would have otherwise. Ownership of property was rewarded by this time only in terms of an early rise in price. All other uses were irrelevant. Speculation in the market provided early returns and less responsibility, and people were buying stocks on margin so they could have the increase in price without the costs of ownership."
| |
|
John Kenneth Galbraith's 'The Great Crash: 1929', 2001.
This paper analyzes John Kenneth Galbraith's book 'The Great Crash: 1929' and its economic aspects.
775 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 0 sources, MLA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper studies the possible reasons for the stock market crash in 1929. It examines John Kenneth Galbraith's book 'The Great Crash: 1929' which claims that the reason for the Great Crash was the over-zealousness and miscalculations of financial analysts and brokers at the time. It discusses how the basis economic theories were suddenly irrelevant afterwards. Finally, it blames the stock market crash on investors that did not want to see the reality.
From the Paper
"John Kenneth Galbraith's book "The Great Crash: 1929 claims that the depression of 1929 was a direct result of the miscalculations of the financial analysts and the other brokers which caused the crash of the stocks. He states that these actors of the economic field had a direct involvement in the stock market and had become too greedy to actually see what was happening to the market around them---too greedy to actually fear the recuperation?s of what was easily predictable as the downfall."
| |
|
"The Great Crash: 1929", 2001.
An analysis of the book, "The Great Crash: 1929" by John Kenneth Galbraith.
780 words (approx. 3.1 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 19.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a brief look at the book "The Great Crash: 1929" written by economist John Kenneth Galbraith. It explains how the American population was so shaken by the crash because their expectations of the economy had been so high and the shock was great.
From the Paper
"John Kenneth Galbraith's book The Great Crash: 1929 claims that the depression of 1929 was a direct result of the miscalculations of the financial analysts and the other brokers which caused the crash of the stocks. He states that these actors of the economic field had a direct involvement in the stock market and had become too greedy to actually see what was happening to the market around them---too greedy to actually fear the recuperation?s of what was easily predictable as the downfall."
| |
|
"The Great Crash: 1929," by John Kenneth Galbraith, 2008.
A review of John Kenneth Galbraith's book "The Great Crash: 1929."
1,786 words (approx. 7.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper examines "The Great Crash: 1929," by John Kenneth Galbraith, and the reasons that it gives for the economic downfall of that period. The writer explains some of Galbraith's chief arguments, such as buying on margin and rampant speculation, the lack of responsibility among the higher institutions like the city banks and the Federal Reserve, and the disorganization and miscommunication between governing bodies. The writer concludes that Galbraith gives not only a historical representation of the era, but an almost behind the scenes look at how the higher up were affected as well.
From the Paper
"What Galbraith attempts to do is paint the reader a picture of the entire era both before and after the historic crash. The writing itself flows very uniformly in regards to historical accuracy filled with milestone dates and stock exchange numbers, however, the real importance of the text deals with the overall theory or mental perception of both the higher acting officials all the way down to the average middleclass American worker. It is from this perspective that Galbraith's true message throughout the book will claim that the reason for the crash of 1929 is not necessarily the lack of willingness or financial backing of the people; as was the ending result, but rather the high levels of incompetence, denial, lacking responsibility, and speculation that will ultimately lead to the market's untimely demise."
|
|
|
