| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "FREUD NIETZSCHE": |
|
|
Freud and Nietzsche, 2008.
Compares Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche's conceptions of the human self.
1,340 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that both Freud and Nietzsche wrote at length about what it is that keeps people from achieving happiness and fulfillment. The author points out that, by rejecting the claims and holds of religion upon truth and its value in elevating the human condition, Freud and Nietzsche were revolutionaries. The paper suggests that, while both take similar approaches and appear to be judging the world from an objective standpoint, they both, especially Freud, clearly fall into their own subjective traps in delimiting the nature of the self, its habits, its inadequacies and its reason for being.
From the Paper
"Clearly, for Nietzsche, it is this desire to impose order upon the world that is the basic human drive, that which distinguishes people from animals, and is a basic need that all people share--which tells us why language exists, and science, and the law. This ability to impose an ordering on the world is what makes us human, the fundamental drive that creates order allows us to maintain that order and to be social beings. Perhaps it is the social aspect which is the real, underlying drive and which creates our need to believe that the world which surrounds us is classifiable, quantifiable and static."
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche on Morality, 2002.
A look at the different manifestations of morality in the writings of Freud and Nietzsche.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 3 sources, £ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is an examination of the perspective of moral qualities in the works of Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche. Morality is compared in two formats: These formats are those of the individual morality, or how morality applies to a single person, and the social morality, or how morality works within a social context.
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche, A Construction of Self, 2006.
An exploration and critical evaluation of the construction of the self as viewed by Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche.
2,011 words (approx. 8.0 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper evaluates and compares the philosophical point of view, as expressed by famous philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, of the construction of the self with that of Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytical point of view regarding the construction of the self. The paper concludes with a look at how each of these famous men contributed to the field of meta-psychology and by pointing out the urgency of developing a a common understandable language for this field.
From the Paper
"Although Friedrich Nietzche the famous German Rhetorician and Philosophical Language writer was never truly involved in psychoanalysis per se, his commentaries upon the use of linguistics do become important in the definition self for our purposes. For example, his many works concerning the meaning of truth not only deeply troubled the man and contributed to his early retirement from a prestigious university position they likewise created concerns for others in many and varied professions. The profession of teaching, on whatever level and the Medical Professions both physical and mental are good examples of the applications of his philosophies."
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche: Super-egos and Idols, 2000.
A comparison of the main viewpoints of Friedrich Nietzsche in "Twilight of the Idols" and Sigmund Freud in "Civilization and Its Discontents".
1,537 words (approx. 6.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the works of philosophers Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud (""Twilight of the Idols" and "Civilization and Its Discontents" respectively). It outlines and compares their views on science, religion, nature, the individual and society. The paper also focuses on the subject of instincts/passions vs. reason.
From the Paper
"In the midst of so much confusion, so many contrasting affirmations, opinions and perspectives, what conclusions can be drawn? What lasting truths can one hold on to? Sigmund Freud, in his Civilization and Its Discontents, and Friedrich Nietzsche, in Twilight of the Idols, offer a good summary of many of their views. Freud and Nietzsche, both complex men of enormous egos, share many of the same ideas on the topics of science, religion, the individual and society, with the exception of a few minor differences."
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche, 2004.
This paper discusses the ideas of Sigmund Freud, who insisted that instincts alone to rule a man?s life, and Friedrich Nietzsche, who believed that a man must question all the doctrines imposed on him.
1,345 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains Sigmund Freud believed that the sexual instinct, or libido, was the motivating power behind human acts and behavior and that the overall conflict between civilization and sexuality was based on the frustration or obstacle placed upon that instinct; frustration developed the neurosis that characterized civilization. The author points out that Nietzsche was a proponent of nihilism. and probably the first existential philosopher. by arguing that there was no objective order or structure in the world except what men created or perceived. This paper relates that Nietzsche?s 'superman' was the highest expression and projection of will, the very creative force behind all human endeavor that an enlightened and happy society must observe and cultivate.
From the Paper
"Man instinctively wanted to be joined to a sexual object as opposed to groups, which was how society managed its governed. Society has always attempted to control individual impulses by subjugating inborn impulses to the higher, more valuable group interests, which endeavored to produce ?gratification substitutes? to the individual sexual craving and aggressions. Most men agreed, and still do, to this manipulation of their inner and natural desires only because of their own need to belong and the individual limitations. The result was the development of neurosis for driving this natural appetite into the darkest subconscious or conscious mind of man and giving it a very bad name and image."
| |
|
Freud and Nietzsche, 2003.
Considers their views of human nature.
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 2 sources, £ 44.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Discusses the similarity of their concepts and the differences in their outlook toward human nature. Describes Nietzsche's emphasis on the outer person, including the need for people to be led by a Superman. Examines Freud's emphasis on the inner person.
From the Paper
"While it can be said that Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud offered virtually identical views of human nature and of the society in which they lived, it must be stated that they lived in different societies, and that their ..."
| |
|
Nietzsche and Freud: Love Thy Neighbor, 2002.
A paper which discusses views held by Nietzsche and Freud on man's relationship with his neighbors.
635 words (approx. 2.5 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 15.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the views held by Nietzsche and Freud over human nature in general and neighbors in particular. The paper discusses the fallibility of theories held by the two thinkers citing examples such as the relationship between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.
From the Paper
"In contrast with the religious teachings and the moralistic stance, both Freud and Nietzsche have taken a rather negative stance. In an attempt to equip human nature with greater knowledge of his fellowmen, they have destroyed the inherent goodness and innocence. The ignorance regarding an individual?s ulterior intentions tends to result in civility and spontaneity in human interactions. The knowledge on the other hand, begets negativity and cynicism. The knowledge that a fellowman?s ill will towards oneself only results in a desire to seek revenge which only perpetuates the cycle of negative actions and consequent negative reactions."
| |
|
Freud?s "Civilization and its Discontents" and Nietzsche?s "Beyond Good and Evil", 2001.
The following paper examines the way in which Sigmund Freud and Friedrich Nietzsche addressed the concept of human nature and of the society in which human nature was bound.
1,180 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper endeavours to explore the theories behind human nature, the impact of the world that Freud and Nietzsche were living in at the time, religion and approaching utopia through the works "Civilization and its Discontents" by Freud and "Beyond Good and Evil" by Nietzsche.
From the Paper
"Regarding human nature, Freud was reticent in purporting that we are inherently sinful, but rather that we come in this world full of Id. This wild, instinctive foundation is the basis upon which the infrastructure of the human psyche is erected. We are born into a dangerous world and we endeavor to evade pain and secure pleasure. Freud perceives the Id as a product of our evolutionary progress as Darwin outlined it (e.g. natural selection needs a conflict to ensue for staying alive as well as reproduction). So Freud?s assessment of human nature is rather cynical, we are fundamentally egotistical self-justifying pursuers of hedonistic satisfactions, which comprises aggression and sex."
| |
|
Nietzsche?s Alternative, 2004.
Examines Friedrich Nietzsche's caste system within the context of Fredrick Appel's "Nietzsche Contra Democracy".
1,800 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Fredrick Appel is one of the few that carefully agrees with Nietzsche's alternative to democracy in his work, "Nietzsche Contra Democracy". This paper examines Nietzsche's proposal for a caste system. For Nietzsche, democracy creates an illusion were everyone thinks they are right and seldom seeks advice from their betters. In a well-ordered society, everyone has their place, and the lower-ordered human beings are honored to seek and follow the advice of their betters. In such a society, everyone is working together to reach a better ultimate goal, whatever that goal may be.
From the Paper
"In a caste system, "the natural slave would flourish - in his own limited manner... in a properly ordered society the natural slave finds an intrinsic satisfaction in the fulfillment of his or her limited capacities" (Appel, 129). It is refreshing to think that even a man such as a slave could find a harmonious satisfaction with life, instead of forgetting his own significant virtues and attempting to strive for those he does not attain or need. This type of satisfaction that is born out of a caste system leads to everyone treating one another with respect. Jealousy and envy towards the Jones's is diminished, and a life trying to keep up with the Jones's is recognized as unsatisfying and, actually, never considered. In Nietzsche's words, "For the mediocre, it is happiness to be mediocre" (Appel, 129)."
| |
|
Nietzsche and the Principle of the Anti-Zarathustra, 2002.
Examines Nietzsche's "Thus Spake Zarathustra", widely believed to be the most personal and auto-biographical of his works.
2,576 words (approx. 10.3 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Analyzes Nietzsche's autobiographical work "Thus Spake Zarathustra" by comparing it to Nietzsche's writings in the "Antichrist". Questions whether it is Zarathustra who is the main character in Nietzsche?s book, or whether it is Nietzsche himself who is the main character in the book. The paper concludes by suggesting that perhaps Nietzsche actually viewed himself as the AntiZarathustra.
From the Paper
"The traditional Christian telling of the coming of the Antichrist, speaks of the way in which this ?Beast? takes possession of a willing human host. In short, demonic possession is at the root of the coming of the Antichrist. This is important to the matter at hand because of the way in which the idea of possession interacted with the writing of Thus Spake Zarathustra. Nietzsche, for all his professions of atheism, has a deeply religious nature that shows in all his works. This book in particular is deeply religious in nature, but religious sentiment shines through in his loyalty to Dionysus and his passion for the Antichrist. It is not traditional religion, for sure, but religion nonetheless."
| |
|
Nietzsche on Reason and Morality, 2007.
An examination of Friedrich Nietzsche's views on reason and morality.
1,755 words (approx. 7.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 39.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at Friedrich Nietzsche's attempts to show the empty interior of the "idols", that is, the "truths" man has taken to heart so blindly. The paper focuses on Nietzsche's views regarding two such 'truths', reason and morality, and points out that it is not so much the falsity of these idols that Nietzsche wants brought to light but their life-denying qualities that have had such a tight grasp on our lives. The paper then asserts that Nietzsche's message for future generations was to not let reason and morality reign over mankind. The paper concludes that Nietzsche advocated that we question the 'truths' we hold so dear, those that seem to him to do little more than prevent us from living.
From the Paper
"Reason is the first enemy in Nietzsche's battle against the denial of life. At first he sets out to show how reason has progressed (starting with Plato) into a current form that is such denial of life that it caused nihilism to spread across Europe. When Plato first began investigating the world he came to the conclusion that what we experience here on earth could not be the reality or nature of world as it really was in itself. The importance Plato placed upon such earthly objects and occurrences (instead of a sort of self existence) was a representative quality, in which they were mere glimpses, place-holders for reality, the 'forms' of such a world that existed beyond the heavens. Thus the world became homage to truth rather than truth itself; this event, for Nietzsche, was the 'sun beginning to set'."
| |
|
Friedrich Nietzsche's " Beyond Good and Evil", 2001.
An examination of Nietzsche's views on the "will," "free will," "unfree will," "physical body," "subservient body," and "cause and effect."
1,792 words (approx. 7.2 pages), 1 source, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is based on Nietzsche?s views on he ?will,? ?free will,? ?unfree will,? ?physical body,? ?subservient body,? and ?cause and effect? as outlined in his book "Beyond Good & Evil". The author attempts to write the paper in the same style as Nietzsche and builds Nietzsche?s definitions of the terms mentioned above and relates them to each other. The paper covers a number of important Nietzsche concepts.
| |
|
Nietzsche's Philosophy, 2007.
This paper examines Nietzsche's impact on literary modernism.
2,152 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 47.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses Friedrich Nietzsche and the founding of modernism. The paper describes the various aspects of this genre, as well as Nietzsche's philosophy. The paper explains his ideas that control over life no longer came from outside humanity but human beings had control over their own inner workings. The paper explores Nietzsche's belief that "God is dead", which was perhaps one of the most world-defining statements made in recent history.
Outline:
Modernism
Nietzsche and His Philosophy
Blending the Two
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Literary modernism is a movement that occurred roughly between 1890 and 1939, although these parameters are somewhat flexible. Modernism was a multi-faceted approach to literature, focusing not just on setting and symbolism, but also on language, time, perspective, characters' internal reality and ambiguous endings, as well as other characteristics. With the changes that modernism brought to literature, writers were able to more fully explore the characters that populated the stories, rather than focus on the meanings behind the stories themselves."
| |
|
Kant and Nietzsche, 2006.
A comparison of Immanuel Kant's and Frederich Nietzsche's views of morality.
2,071 words (approx. 8.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper presents two views of morality, those of Kant and Nietzsche, and discusses how each philosopher justifies his viewpoint. Additionally, the paper shows that while Kant's concept of morality is more positive than Nietzsche's, it is Nietzsche's view that is more consistent with reality.
From the Paper
"According to Kant, the same principles that apply to reason also give way to an equal application in dealing with the problems of moral philosophy. Generally speaking, Kant believed that moral judgments deal with how the world should be, not how the world truly is. Because of this, morality can not be derived from experiences, because experience can only tell humans how things really are. Kant assumed, then, that morality must be a priori, since they are independent of the true state of the world around us."
|
|
|
