| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "DAY LIFE IVAN DENISOVITCH": |
|
|
|
'One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich', 2006.
A summary and evaluation of the novel 'One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich' by Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 1 source, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews the novel 'One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich' by Alexander Solzhenitsyn which conveys the life of prisoner in a Stalinist prison camp. Over the period of one day, the main character Ivan must survive insurmountable odds just to stay alive. The author displays an impressive array of details as to how the prisoners work and struggle together to try and improve their odds of survival.
From the Paper
"This literary study will examine the plot of the novel: One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and seek to realize the profound depth of this book within the human condition. The book proceeds to portray the harsh conditions of Stalinist prison camp, which involves the impressive detailing of one day in the life of this prisoner. This book offers an insightful and clear representation of the horrors of Stalinist treatment of political prisoners that would not or could not abide by the hard line communism of the 1950s era. The prisoner Ivan Denisovich is one of many members of Gang 104 at a Stalinist prison camp. The early part of the book revolves around his quest for food, and how much he can steal to get to keep him alive."
| |
|
"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" and Soviet History, 2002.
This paper examines "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn.
2,900 words (approx. 11.6 pages), 16 sources, £ 55.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
It focuses on its links to Soviet history. This is true of the novels setting and plot (the lives of prisoners in a Stalinist labor camp in Siberia). However, it is also true that the novel's publication history reveals a great deal about Soviet history.
| |
|
"One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", 2002.
A literary review of Solzhenitsyn's novel dealing with freedom and life.
850 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 15.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the issues of freedom and the futility of life, through the novel "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The writer points out many of the negative issues faced by the main character Ivan, including his imprisonment and the hardships he faced but despite this, manages to explore the positive aspects as well, those of humanity and preservation of life among others. The writer believes that since the book was written, without the author knowing if it would ever be published, proves that ultimately hope was evident.
From the Paper
"The fact that people in the camps (or the characters in the book) did what they had to do to survive is not necessarily a negative characteristic, but speaks to the fact that life is precious, even if the human being seeking to stay alive is reduced to the level of a simple animal in the process. Certainly Ivan is not an animal himself, but he is a simple man, not an intellectual, but a good man trying to make his way from one day to the next, one moment to the next. And that is just the way that he looks at his life in the camps."
| |
|
Alexander Solzhenitsyn's "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", 1991.
This paper summarizes Alexander Solzhenitsyn's novel "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich", one man's survival in a Stalin-era concentration camp.
1,350 words (approx. 5.4 pages), 1 source, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"The author of One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn of Russia, spent eight years in concentration camps and three years in exile for the offense of writing derogatory remarks about Stalin while serving as a captain in the Russian army. The experiences in the camps provided the material for this novel, the only one of his works published in his native land. This stark story details the events of a typical day in a brutal, arctic slave labor camp in Siberia in the 1940's. The novel unfolds from the point of view of one prisoner, an ordinary working man, called Shukov throughout most of the work.
During a quarter of a century, the vast concentration camp system created by Stalin affected directly or indirectly almost ... "
| |
|
"One Day In The Life of Ivan Denisovich ", 2002.
A critical review of the book, "One Day In The Life of Ivan Denisovich" by Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
1,700 words (approx. 6.8 pages), 0 sources, MLA, £ 28.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reviews the book, focusing on existential issues such as the struggle to find meaning in a harsh, painful world. It explores the literary techniques that accompany Solzhenitsyn's skillful treatment of weighty questions. The importance of work is also looked at as a theme, as is the triumph of the petty.
From the Paper
"One Day In The Life of Ivan Denisovich is a quintessential novel of life in a Siberian GULAG. Alexander Solzhenitsyn focuses on "one day in the life of Ivan Denisovich" to typify Soviet prison life, elucidate the social situations of the time, and comment on the admirable qualities in the human spirit. Minute in its time frame, One Day in the Life is magnanimous in scope. More about the struggle to find meaning in a harsh, painful world than an attempt to provide historical meaning, One Day In The Life tackles existential issues. Solzhenitsyn's literary techniques accompany his skilful treatment of weighty questions."
| |
|
"Night" vs. "One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich", 2003.
A critical analysis of comparisons and contrasts in works of Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Elie Wiesel.
1,488 words (approx. 6.0 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this paper, the oppressive regimes that reached their apogee during the Second World War are brought to light with personal anecdotes from two individuals who were reduced to prisoners. Ivan Denisovich, who was sent to a Soviet gulag for a crime he didn't commit, and Elie Wiesel, whose only crime was his race, have very similar stories taking place in two regimes that were mortal enemies. The all-too-familiar similarities between Stalin and Hitler's regimes are showcased in this work.
From the Paper
"One Day In The Life Of Ivan Denisovich, by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, and Night, by Elie Wiesel, are two works that have moved many people for half a century. These two books are very lean and concise works that utilize emotional and powerful words strung together to weave a story of triumph over adversity. In less than two-hundred pages, the reader gains a greater perspective on how the human spirit can survive during tough times; the influence of these two works is so powerful that the two authors had received Nobel prizes. However, even with the many similarities, there are many differences as well, and through analysis of the conditions of both stories, the worlds of these two individual authors can be better understood."
| |
|
Armistice Day - Veteran's Day, 2002.
This paper discusses the history of Armistice Day that began after WWI.
3,369 words (approx. 13.5 pages), 10 sources, APA, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the origins and rituals surrounding Armistice Day, or as it is better known, Veteran's Day. The author explains how Armistice Day began after WWI and was treated as a holiday and since it was created, many different rituals are carried out. The paper refers to many sources describing the changes in the way Americans celebrated Veteran's Day after WWI to the present.
From the Paper
"At 11 a. m. on November 11, 1918, the imperial German army radioed to the world that it had signed the Allied unconditional terms of surrender, and had agreed to the laying down of arms. The guns of the Great War became silent, and were replaced by outbursts of joy across the nation. It was finally over, over there. In 1995, New York City commemorated this event with 500,000 cheering, flag-waving spectators lining the roads. With thundering drums punctuating nostalgic Glenn Miller swing music, tens of thousands of proud American warriors marched out of the past and up Fifth Avenue in New York's largest Veterans Day Parade since the end of World War II. This 1995 parade was a victory of sorts due to the fact that, in recent years, Veterans Day observations have become, as Robert McFadden says, "desultory at best, with spectators often limited to passers-by walking their dogs or heading out for a quart of milk." This parade was evidence of a revival in veteran appreciation, and a renewal of Veterans Day as a much-celebrated American holiday. But while this parade can be used to model a renewal in ceremony and enthusiasm, the true meaning of Veterans Day, or Armistice Day as it was originally called, has been lost through name changes and changes in those it is supposed to honor."
| |
|
Finding Meaning: Tolstoy's "The Death of Ivan Ilych", 2001.
This paper examines how Tolstoy attempts to persuade us to find meaning in life by presenting two distinct sets of supporting characters and by demonstrating why Ivan Ilych is afraid to die and what causes his suffering.
2,180 words (approx. 8.7 pages), 1 source, £ 34.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper analyzes the title character of Leo Tolstoy's "The Death of Ivan Ilych", making clear the author's intention that each of us must discover how to lead a meaningful life. Tolstoy attempts to persuade us to his point of view by presenting two distinct sets of supporting characters and by demonstrating why Ivan Ilych is afraid to die and what causes his suffering. In addition, Tolstoy warns of the social conditions that prevent most people from accomplishing in life what Ivan Ilych could only achieve in death.
From the paper:
"Two hours before his death Ivan Ilych finally asks the right question. After three days of screaming through agonizing pain, he laments that his life "was all not the right thing," and passes into death wondering "what is the right thing?" (151). With this final realization and questioning, the title character of Leo Tolstoy's "The Death of Ivan Ilych" makes clear the author's intention that each of us must find the right thing and discover how to lead a meaningful life. Tolstoy explains that even at this final moment, Ivan Ilych is capable of redeeming himself and making this discovery, that though his life had not been what it should have been, this could still be rectified (151). If Ivan Ilych can do it at the last minute, the rest of us still can."
| |
|
Relevance of Ivan Ilych, 2007.
This paper discusses Leo Tolstoy's book "The Death of Ivan Ilych" and looks at its relevance today.
1,323 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this study of "The Death of Ivan Ilych" by Leo Tolstoy, the writer notes that the book is very relevant today because of its message concerning living an empty life, one that is filled with pursuing all the wrong things. The writer points out that Tolstoy gets straight to the truth about life and how it should be lived, in this story about a very ordinary man that realizes he has wasted his life. The writer discusses that Ivan shows how people can become manipulated by egotism, falsity, and hypocrisy and waste their lives chasing these things in vain. Further, the writer demonstrates that the story is pertinent today, because we find many individuals living the same kind of life that Ivan did without even knowing it. In addition, the writer discusses that death is inevitable and instead of chasing after empty ideals, man should think of life beyond death. The writer concludes that through this point of view, one sees how Tolstoy was a severe realist, which allows his message and social commentary to remain just as significant today as ever.
From the Paper
"The phsyical death that Ivan endures is "merely the last phase of mortality" . From this perspective, we can see how Tolstoy inserts his belief that all things in life are coverings for the reality of death. In short, death is inevitable. How Tolstoy approaches this particular death forces us to think about the meaning of our own lives. Death is more than death. When we see Ivan's attitude change, we see a ray of hope that we can life a life that is right, good and satisfying, if we choose. What we must realize is that the choices are difficult and sometimes not always clear. This is the truth of Ivan's life.
This notion leads us to another concept that Tolstoy supported, which was that one must listen to his or her own inner voice. This is a problem our society struggles with today because we are constantly bombarded with messages from every angle. If we do not find our own voice and find our own way, we will surely be lead atray by meaningless efforts."
| |
|
Arab-Israeli Conflict: The Six-Day War, 2002.
A day-by-day discussion of the events of the Six-Day War.
3,235 words (approx. 12.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper breaks the war down, and gives details of the events of each day. The paper also looks at the broader political picture and how this conflict fits into it. By recounting a brief history of the Middle East post World War II and examining the events of the Six-Day War, this paper reveals how Israel's military progress was both advanced and restricted by the influence of the Super-powers in the region.
From the Paper
"The Six Days War was essentially a regional conflict until one considers its broader Cold War strategic implications. As a client of the United States, Israel was able to utilize its air power to its fullest, allowing the Israeli army to make astounding gains in the course of a few days. So dominant was the air superiority of Israel that the conquest of the Arab nations surrounding it seemed almost inevitable. Further, support from the United States in the form of military hardware and diplomatic inaction allowed Israel to prosecute the war more effectively and to extend its dominance over its Arab neighbours in less than a week. Conversely, the threat of intervention by the USSR, in order to protect strategic interests in the region, prevented Israel from completely conquering the Middle East. "
| |
|
Ivan the Terrible, 2007.
This paper portrays the violent rule of Ivan IV, known as Ivan the Terrible.
5,614 words (approx. 22.5 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 70.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper illustrates the terrors and unremitting hostility of Ivan IV and shows how Russia suffered greatly under his leadership. The paper discusses how, although Ivan started out with improvements for Russia in mind and certainly had the intelligence and political pull to accomplish great things, he allowed himself and his government to get dragged down in impossible battles. The paper shows how due to his mental state, Ivan ran his government in a formidable way and was considered fearsome by many of his subjects. The paper concludes that Ivan perpetuated the flawed system and created deep animosities that would cause more problems in the future.
From the Paper
"The baby destined to be Ivan IV was born to Tsar Vasily III and his second wife, Elena Glinskaia. Vasily III was much older than Ivan's mother. By the time Ivan was born, he was desperate for a son to be the future tsar of Russia. Vasily's first wife, Solomonia, never produced a child of either sex. After years of marriage, Vasily pursued a controversial divorce and re-marriage. Vasily received permission for his new marriage from the Metropolitan Daniel in Russia, however, Vasily wanted assurance from a higher power and sought approval from the Greek Patriarch who may have inadvertently cursed the unborn Ivan. The Patriarch wrote to Vasily, "if you contract a second marriage, you will have a wicked son; your states will be prey to terror and tears; rivers of blood will flow; the heads of the mighty will fall; your cities will be devoured by flames.""
| |
|
Cultural Tourism and the Day of the Dead, 2008.
Discusses the feelings of the people of Mexico regarding tourism during the holiday, Day of the Dead, based on Lucero Morales Cano and Avis Mysyk's article "Cultural tourism, the State, and the Day of the Dead".
1,336 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 2 sources, APA, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper is a review of an article entitled "Cultural tourism, the State, and the Day of the Dead", which the writer find particularly relevant to him because of his plans to observe Day of the Dead celebrations during an upcoming visit to Mexico. The paper then relates the emotions of the writer prior to an intended visit to Mexico during the "Day of the Dead " celebrations, noting that there is a conflict between the authorities who welcome tourism on this holiday and the civilians who see tourism as intrusion into a sacred historical ritual and oppose it being promoted as a tourist attraction. The paper also explains that the community is divided on the subject, as many recognize the economic importance of tourism.
From the Paper
"These dynamics are evident in Mexico, particularly concerning how to mediate the conflict between the state and local residents over the tourist attraction that Day of the Dead festivities have become because of globalization. Cano and Mysyk have studied the problems which have arisen in the village of Huaquechula since 1988, when the one road leading into the village was paved for the benefit of tourists and the village became a part of the tourism circuit. In the process of studying the impact of these developments, Mysyk surveyed the villagers regarding their appreciation of the presence of tourists, their behavior, their feelings about tourists photographing or videotaping altars, and related issues."
| |
|
Two "Saints": Dorothy Day and St. Augustine, 2002.
This paper discusses the commitment to God of St. Augustine and Catholic Worker Movement leader Dorothy Day as presented in the books "The Confessions of St. Augustine" translated by John K. Ryan and "Dorothy Day: A Radical Devotion" by Robert Coles.
1,430 words (approx. 5.7 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that Catholic Worker Movement leader Dorothy Day and St. Augustine may be separated by years, but they are brother and sister in their joy and passion for life, for God, and for serving their Lord to the best of their abilities. The paper relates that Day question God throughout her life but found the answers in her work, in her strong commitment, and her relationship with God. The author believes that while Dorothy Day has not been raised to sainthood by the Church, she is certainly a saint in her own right and deserves a place beside St. Augustine.
From the Paper
"By sharing their writings and really their souls with their readers, both Day and St. Augustine not only show their beliefs - they are actually perpetuating them. Those who read their stories cannot help but be touched by these devout people and the path they chose to worship and share their worship. They are more than believers; they are doers, for they dedicated their lives to following the path of God, and leading others down that path to joy and salvation. One of the things that really stand out in their wittings is their passion and commitment to what they are doing, and their passion and commitment in life. As they share their joy with others, they not only transform others' lives, they transform their own, and that is one of the things that helps their stories ring so true, and become so influential in the eyes of readers."
| |
|
Euthanasia and Ivan Ilych., 2002.
Discusses the idea of euthanasia as portrayed by the character Ivan Ilyich in Leo Tolstoy's novel.
1,400 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
All forms of life have an end. Tolstoy gave us a wholly unsympathetic character in the form of Ivan Ilyich. Ivan Ilych is embarrassed that someone should see him is his condition, "but just through this most unpleasant matter, Ivan Ilych obtained comfort." Ivan Ilych is "touched" by Gerasim's unconditional caring, but it never occurs to him that he should act the same way. Even in Ivan Ilych's death, Gerasim is at task. Ivan Ilych is dead, yet Gerasim feels compelled to maintain his aura of dignity to the last.
|
|
|
