| Papers [1-14] of 100 :: [Page 1 of 8] | | Go to page : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 —> | Search results on "AMERICAN IMPERIALISM": |
|
|
American Imperialism in the Twentieth Century, 2002.
Discusses American imperialism in 20th century and explores how America deals with its neighboring countries.
1,150 words (approx. 4.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Some examples of American imperialism in the twentieth century will be given and explained as to why they occur and how they happen. By examining the methods and different ways that Imperialism has affected other countries, as a result of American intervention, there can be a better analysis of how the world is affected from it.
| |
|
American Imperialism, 2002.
A look at how the concept of American Imperialism has affected the island of Hawaii.
1,178 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper introduces, discuss and compares the concept of American New Imperialism. Specifically, it discusses the significance of America's acquisition of Hawaii. It looks at the history of the island and the heritage of its inhabitants and then examines how all this was destroyed due to the American gaining control of the island.
From the Paper
"Imperialism took place around the globe in 1800 and 1900s at a tremendous scale. Most of the imperialist powers were based in Europe, such as England and France, but the United States had its share of annexations and takeovers, such as The Panama Canal and the Philippines. However, the United States annexation of Hawaii is perhaps one of the worst examples of imperialism in history. "This act of American imperialism was the death knell of Hawaiian sovereignty and continues to negatively affect the lives of people of Hawaiian blood today.""
| |
|
American Imperialism, 2007.
A discussion on American imperialism, focusing on Theodore Roosevelt.
1,313 words (approx. 5.3 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper first examines the components of Roosevelt's foreign policy, as build upon the Monroe Doctrine. The paper then looks at this policy in action, as seen in repeated interventions into sovereign countries, as well as during the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars. The writer argues that these interventions led to considerable resentment in Latin American countries. The paper analyzes how there is a second side to Roosevelt's foreign policy, that of being a "good neighbor." By the 1920s, Roosevelt had moved away from colonizing as a superior power to one emphasizing commercial relations and the need for nations to act like good neighbors. The paper concludes that Roosevelt's "big stick" and "good neighbor" policies have had lasting effects on diplomacy in the Western Hemisphere, through World War II until the Cold War.
Outline:
Abstract
Content
References
From the Paper
"This "big stick" policy is a significant departure from previous foreign policies, which were based on coastal defense. The new century, however, brought on a changing global vision of United States security. Previously, the thought of an army and militia coming to the rescue was enough to make the American government feel secure. However, by the 1890s, the age of "big navies" meant that imperialist countries such as the United States could be threatened by conflicts that are occurring far from its shores. Navalists such as the young Theodore Roosevelt therefore began to think of American security in terms of the greater global framework. Since America is an imperialist country, it also needed to conceive of a global security framework to safeguard its colonial possessions (Tompkins)."
| |
|
Justifying American Imperialism, 2000.
A discussion of American imperialistic ventures in the late 1800's, specifically the Spanish American War, Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines, explaining why intervention was justified.
945 words (approx. 3.8 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses many primary sources of the day and their opinions on what America was doing at the time, including the debate between isolationism and the belief in intervention. The paper quotes many opinions backing both sides and shows why one side was right.
From the Paper
From the outset of the United States? independence from Britain, it had abided by a foreign policy of no foreign policy. This isolationist policy was stressed by George Washington, the nation?s first president. It was not until the late 19th century that the United States took an active role in international politics, intervening between Spain and Cuba. This intervention led to the Spanish American War, and the US gaining additional territories from Spain. The issue of whether the US had the right to control Cuba, Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines was a topic of great debate among the politicians of the day. The vast public opinion favored the United State?s intervention and expansion, as it was clearly the reasonable approach.
| |
|
Humanitarian Motives in 1890s American Imperialism, 1999.
An examination of how much humanitarian concerns played a role in American diplomacy in the 1890s.
593 words (approx. 2.4 pages), 4 sources, £ 14.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
From the Paper
"American foreign policy was the result of a multitude of causes. Among the most important influences upon American foreign policy were business and popular sentiment. Business desired an expansionist policy to provide a market for their exports. Popular sentiment also demanded empire; the atrocities of foreign butchers, such as Weyler in Cuba, were intolerable and the humanitarian nature of the American character required that the United States act decisively. At times, these two forces worked in opposition to each other. For instance, American businessmen with over $50 million invested in Cuba and that imported over $100 million worth of goods annually feared that military action in Cuba could jeopardize their interests. The eventual outbreak of the Spanish-American war, incited in part by rage of Spain?s inhumane policies, proves the power of humanitarianism in shaping diplomacy during the late nineteenth century."
| |
|
American Imperialism and 9/11, 2002.
And analysis of whether U.S. foreign policies led to hatred on part of terrorists.
1,125 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 6 sources, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
Analysis of whether U.S. foreign policies led to hatred on part of terrorists. Discusses perception of U.S. interests as self-serving. Pro-Israel bias. Purpose of U.S> foreign policy to protect American economic interests. Dissatisfaction in Islamic regimes over U.S. exporting American ideals of democracy. Tie-in of democracy to modern consumer goods.
From the Paper
"American Imperialism as a Cause of September 11?
Perhaps the two most frequently asked questions after the terrorist attacks of September 11, were "Why do these people hate America so?" and "Are we somehow partially to blame for inciting terrorists?" There are no simple, pat answers. But, scanning some of the letters to the editors in this weeks TIME Magazine (Oct 22) might shed some light on the issue:
"The problem is that U.S. citizens have little reciprocal feeling for U.S. engineered human tragedy elsewhere. The U.S. needs to be aware that even among the countries is considers its subordinates and even within affluent nations the U./S. considers its compliant..."
| |
|
American Imperialism, 2002.
An overview of the United States as an imperialist power in the early twentieth century.
900 words (approx. 3.6 pages), 5 sources, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper will discuss why it was important to have the United States be in imperialist power after the Spanish American wars of 1898, and the Roosevelt era. By understanding this, we can see the affects of this policy that strengthened America's outlook on the rest of the world. This not only created some certain terms to make use of the world's resources, but expanded the power of the US, as well. By realizing this, certain examples of hegemony will be used to understand why it was important to do this in the early twentieth century.
| |
|
Cultural Imperialism., 2002.
This paper discusses cultural imperialism in the Canadian/American relationship.
1,650 words (approx. 6.6 pages), 9 sources, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper reviews American cultural imperialism as expressed in a variety of manners and methods.
| |
|
The 'New Imperialism', 2002.
This paper examines the 'New Imperialism' ('Capitalist Imperialism') of 1870-1914.
2,400 words (approx. 9.6 pages), 11 sources, £ 61.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper is structured around a debate about Marxist analyses of imperialism, particularly in the period 1870-1914 and alternative explanations.
| |
|
Imperialism, 2007.
This paper discusses the role of imperialism in the development of nations.
1,027 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article the writer points out that imperialism has been a driving force in global economic and social development throughout much of history. A definition of imperialism is provided as acquiring nations by extending control over foreign entities. The writer notes that from ancient China, through Western Europe, and even today, the process of garnering control and using underutilized assets from lesser developed nations has shaped the world. The writer then discusses that as trade barriers dissolve, it becomes increasingly clear that imperialism has changed form from a singular nation-strategy, to a multi-national organization strategy as a globalizing force. The writer concludes that globalization, in a more socially responsible format, could lead to bona fide human liberation globally, making it the farthest thing from imperialism as possible and, therefore, perhaps the light at the end of the dark imperialistic tunnel.
Outline:
Introduction
Imperialism Under the Guise of Developing Underdeveloped Nations
Capitalism, Privatization and Modern Imperialism
Imperialism and Globalization
Conclusion
References
From the Paper
"Throughout history, societies have been subdivided into levels of development. The industrialized nations of Western Europe and North America, and currently more recently industrialized nations such as Japan, have been dubbed "First World" nations, while others such as many nations in Asia, Africa and Latin America, are categorized as "Third World" nations. This categorization occurs due to several factor include poverty levels, industrialization, and productivity of the nation. Historically, Imperialism is the process of seeing the underutilized riches in an underdeveloped nation, and then taking control of the nation in question, in order to benefit from their lack of ability to defend themselves. It is this historic exploitation that has often negatively affected the nation's current global standing."
| |
|
Consequences of Imperialism, 2004.
This paper discusses the consequences of imperialism while highlighting the effects of European imperialism in Africa, Asia, and Algeria.
1,256 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper gives a detailed explanation about how the European imperialism started and how it exploited the resources and people of both Asia and Africa. The paper also emphasizes on the outcome or after-effects of imperialism in Europe, Asia, and Africa.
From the Paper
"For four hundred years, the world has been quite aware of the European imperialism. Examples of European imperialism were found not only in Europe but also in other continents as a result of outward European expansion. The word Imperialism was basically invented during the mid-nineteen century when the age of autocracy was on the rise. Imperialism has led to multiple effects of globalization and multiculturalization in the modern day Europe."
| |
|
Imperialism and Capitalism, 2003.
This paper explores the relationship between imperialism and capitalism.
2,300 words (approx. 9.2 pages), 10 sources, £ 54.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the relationship between imperialism and capitalism from the time of the Spanish Empire to the present. The author describes both forces--capitalism and imperialism--and argues that imperialism is the monopoly stage of capitalism. The paper relates the purpose of Spanish imperialism and how the forms of imperialism have changed over time.
From the Paper
"For many world scholars, the form of slavery, begun by the English in the seventeenth century and continued into the nineteenth century by the Americans, is merely the most naked form of imperialism. It is the domination of an oppressor ..."
| |
|
20th Century Imperialism, 2005.
An examination of imperialism movements in the 20th century.
1,575 words (approx. 6.3 pages), 3 sources, £ 42.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at imperialism in the 20th century. It takes a look at both the pro-imperialism and anti-imperialism points of view. Included are the pro-imperialism ideologies of Teddy Roosevelt and Adolph Hitler and the anti-imperialism arguments of Frantz Fanon and Mahandas Gandhi,as well as others. The political ideas of expansionism and protectionism are explored.
From the Paper
"As the 20th century unfolded, the struggle for and against imperialism continued escalate and became a dominant issue on the world political stage. While political figures in countries as disparate as Nazi Germany and the United States supported and justified imperialism, those who were subjects of it willingly put their lives on the line to oppose it and, hopefully, bring it to an end. For the most part, the pro-imperialist, based their arguments on economic need and/or racism. Such is true in the cases of Jules Ferry, Theodore Roosevelt, and Adolph Hitler. On the other hand, those who stood against imperialism based their arguments on human rights and self-determination. Just before the dawn of the 20th century, both Ferry of France and Roosevelt of the United States led the charge for expansionism by their respective countries."
| |
|
Ecological Imperialism and Marx's Capitalism, 2008.
This paper discusses ecological imperialism in light of Marx's views on capitalism.
1,042 words (approx. 4.2 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at how political imperialism and capitalist forces are closely connected with ecological imperialism. In particular, the paper examines the theories of Alfred W. Crosby and Karl Marx on imperialism and looks at how they relate to ecological imperialism. The paper first discusses Crosby's thesis that imperialism did not only change the political and social structures of colonies but also affected their ecological systems. The paper then looks at Marx's arguments about the damage caused by capitalism. According to Marx, capitalism was a force that treated laborers as machines and did not give them the value they deserved. This degradation of work leads to degradation of environment and ecology.
From the Paper
"Imperialism is a well-understood concept and the mere mention of the word generates extreme sentiments of resentment and bitterness against certain nations of the world. When imperialism in politics was destroying the colonies, there was another phenomenon at work, which had also been working hand in hand. It was called ecological imperialism where entire ecologies of colonies were changed because of imperial influences. Alfred W. Crosby first brought this forward in 1986 in his book Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900."
|
|
|
