| Papers [449-462] of 4570 :: [Page 33 of 327] | | Go to page : <— 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 —> | |
|
|
Illegal Immigrants, 2007.
This paper examines the issue of illegal immigration into America.
850 words (approx. 3.4 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper argues that America should establish a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border as well as bolster efforts to track down those who are in America illegally. The paper contends that illegal immigrants divert social services away from legitimate American citizens, hurt domestic businesses and retailers and increase crime rates.
From the Paper
"Establishing a border fence and aggressively tracking down illegal immigrants will benefit America, first and foremost, because it will eliminate illegal arrivals who are committing crimes on American soil. In an online article, Heather MacDonald writes that the city of Los Angeles has been recently plagued by a ruthless Salvadoran prison gang whose chief members were previously deported for a host of violent crimes. Tragically, despite their brutal track record, members of that gang have once again slipped through the "cracks" along the Southern United States border and are again terrorizing sections of Los Angeles. Making the situation all the worse is the fact that, at least as of late 2004, the City of Los Angeles was actually enforcing a ban against police efforts to enforce immigration law (para.1-2). MacDonald's provocative expose also reveals that 95 percent of outstanding warrants for homicide involve illegal immigrants and as many as two-thirds of fugitive felony warrants are for illegals who should have been previously deported."
| |
|
The Integration of Immigrants, 2007.
A discussion of Peter Skerry's article, "Citizenship Begins at Home: A New Approach to the Civic Integration of Immigrants".
1,002 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, APA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper reviews the article by Peter Skerry, "Citizenship Begins at Home: A New Approach to the Civic Integration of Immigrants", in order to assess the extent to which institutions should be responsible for the integration of new immigrants into American communities. The paper argues that institutions should act formally and informally as support systems for new arrivals, but individuals still must determine where they wish to go with their own lives.
From the Paper
"At the present time, some American universities are arguing that it is part of their mandate to provide "a diverse community" of career professionals with the opportunity to transform themselves so that they might transform society for the better. Indeed, some universities have made such sentiments part of their over-arching mission statement. While some people may feel uncomfortable with such assertions - there are perhaps too many "social engineers" in America as it is - there is definitely something to be said for institutions stepping forward to help groom young people, especially young people from immigrant backgrounds, into productive and faithful Americans. Certainly, Peter Skerry (2004) is correct to point out that what America needs most is for institutions and communities to step forward and provide the structure and guidance necessary for newly-arrived individuals to take full advantage of what America has to offer."
| |
|
Immigrants in the Labor Force, 2007.
An analysis of the positive and negative impact of immigration on the United States.
1,896 words (approx. 7.6 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 43.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper looks at the impact of immigrants upon the United States' domestic economy in terms of the contributions they make and the burdens they compel other Americans to shoulder. At the same time, the paper offers some recommendations and, ultimately, solutions which offer a means by which America can successfully marry immigration inflows with its economic needs as well as with the needs of its native-born population. The paper includes a brief annotated bibliography.
From the Paper
"To close briefly, the preceding paper has looked at immigration in the United States and its impact upon the American economy. Simply put, while the typical immigrant brings many things to America, there is mounting evidence that he or she creates complications for the native-born. At the same time, fears about illegal immigration and what it means for America abounds and there is no reason that this concern will abate any time soon. Ultimately, the best things America can do appear to be the following: tighten border security, increase the educational and professional requirements for immigrants; and put money into punishing those who profit from illegal immigration. If this is done, then there is hope for the future."
| |
|
A Crime of Compassion, 2007.
This paper argues that euthanasia is wrong for moral and intellectual reasons.
1,034 words (approx. 4.1 pages), 2 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper asserts that euthanasia undermines the sanctity of human life and can lead to situations in which people are put to death against their wishes. The paper looks at the reasons why some want to see the widespread use of euthanasia. The paper then examines the position of those opposed to euthanasia and agrees that it must be viewed as a crime of compassion that needs to be punished.
From the Paper
"There are few controversies in our society more polarizing than the topic of Euthanasia. For one thing, a host of moral assumptions and values are brought "into the mix" whenever the subject is brought up. Perhaps more significantly, Euthanasia frightens many people because it involves a matter of life and death and whether or not a human being should be given that power over another human being regardless of how well-meaning the latter might be. In any case, Stedman's Medical Dictionary defines "Euthanasia" as being "The act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or by the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment" ("Euthanasia," defin.1)."
| |
|
Private Security Firms, 2007.
This paper explores the role of private security firms in improving national security.
999 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper looks at Charles Connolly's "The Role of Private Security in Combating Terrorism," where he reveals that local law enforcement agencies are not necessarily up to the task of protecting the average citizen. The paper discusses his solution of employing the services of private security contractors to supplement the effectiveness of current government-based security forces. The paper notes the criticisms against this proposal, examines Connoly's arguments and concludes that partnerships with private firms may well be the best path to improve national security.
From the Paper
"In the United States, there has been a heightened sense of awareness of the potential for terrorism-induced danger since September 11, 2001. The attacks leveled against the United States on that day brought into focus some inadequacies in the state of security response and intelligence in the United States. It has prompted a number of initiatives of questionable Constitutional merit such as warrant-less wiretaps on American citizens and prisoners held in violation of the Geneva Convention. The desire to be safe has, in many cases, overridden common sense and has actually eroded the strength of the freedoms that were being protected."
| |
|
Euthanasia and "The First Immortal", 2007.
A review of the issues about euthanasia presented in James Halperin's novel, "The First Immortal: A Novel of the Future".
2,201 words (approx. 8.8 pages), 12 sources, MLA, £ 48.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the debate over the legality and ethics of euthanasia. It bases its discussion on James Halperin's novel, "The First Immortal: A Novel of the Future", in which the author begins with a scene that depicts the primary reason why individuals might choose euthanasia over a natural demise. The paper discusses the appropriate character choice in the book and discusses the issues that Halperin presents.
From the Paper
"Detractors of euthanasia as a legal if not state sponsored activity not only rely on the traditional religious reasons against it but also on philosophical and psychological musings. Somerville describes euthanasia as largely resulting from hopelessness and therefore is implying that these individuals are opting for euthanasia simply because they believe they have no future (pars.8-12). Such commentary is overly simplistic and without merit. In fact, the contrary is most often the case. Euthanasia and the decision to employ it is a highly personal one and certainly one in which the participants put much thought into. Additionally, if it were not for the innate sense of hope that the result will be better than their present circumstances that these individuals who, for whatever reason, choose to employ euthanasia, it would not be a serious consideration."
| |
|
Cloning, Society and Huxley, 2007.
This paper presents a persuasive argument on behalf of cloning research and its medical and health related benefits.
2,228 words (approx. 8.9 pages), 12 sources, MLA, £ 49.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper relates that cloning as a scientific activity holds much promise in alleviating many of society's medical issues. The paper examines the concept of cloning in Aldous Huxley's "Brave New World" and shows how cloning today as a medical and scientific activity is far from Huxley's vision of a world of human duplicates. The paper maintains that cloning human beings is not being advocated by anyone in the scientific community and it was Huxley who moved the public psyche to associate cloning with carbon copy human beings. The paper accuses the public of mania and emphasizes that the vast majority of cloning research is concerned only with cloning single cells and tissues associated with treating specific diseases and illnesses.
From the Paper
"Supporters of cloning have a substantial amount of sound scientific evidence as well as a surfeit of informal evidence that establishes a case for active research in cloning. Unfortunately, the concept of cloning received short shrift in Huxley's Brave New World where the author moved cloning in the public consciousness from the mere conceptual to the livid by by-passing the scientific process completely. That is, where in reality cloning full-blown human beings is not being advocated by anyone in the scientific community, Huxley moved the public psyche from the idea to associating cloning with carbon copy human beings who would somehow be devoid of human qualities but desire them none-the-less: "But I don't want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin." (288). Thus, the entire research process and the simple development of cloned tissues used in treating various illnesses and afflictions, for example, were by-passed and suddenly cloning was equated with moral reprehensibility. Yet, the reality is that cloning as a medical and scientific activity is far less romanticized as a human activity that popping out human duplicates left and right."
| |
|
Due Process and the War against Terror, 2007.
An explanation of three approaches that the US can take to provide due process to suspected terrorists.
1,197 words (approx. 4.8 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the War on Terror and the number of issues that have been raised vis-a-vis how Americans should treat suspected terrorists. The paper provides an explanation of three different approaches to providing due process to these terrorists and suggests that a compromise approach should be followed. The paper describes each approach and describes the suggested compromise.
From the Paper
"As suggested above, a careful regard for the procedural rights of suspected terrorists - their "Due Process" rights - is vital inasmuch as it sends a message to critics both within and without America that the world's great superpower is committed to doing the "right thing" and not merely the expedient thing. Needless to say, projecting this image goes a long way towards solidifying international support for U.S. military operations abroad and it also goes a very long way towards ensuring that other nations will be more cooperative in "rooting out" terrorist elements within their own states - both developments which will necessarily bolster U.S. security. But more than that, America is in a position where it can protect the procedural rights of terrorist operatives without bequeathing to those individuals the sorts of privileges and prerogatives normally available to an American citizen accused of a criminal offense in the United States."
| |
|
Capital Punishment as a Deterrent, 2007.
A review of literature in favor of and in opposition to capital punishment.
1,067 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 26.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper describes and assesses four scholarly articles which provide arguments either in favor of or in opposition to capital punishment. It briefly explains why one of the sources appears to be the best of the quartet while another seems to flag behind the others. In the end, the paper reveals just how contentious the issue of capital punishment is and how divided the academic community remains even after decades of research.
Table of Contents:
Abstract
Opposing Capital Punishment: A Look at Four Scholarly Sources
Facts In Support Of Writer's Position
Facts Opposing This Writer's Position
The Strongest And Weakest Source
From the Paper
"After carefully reviewing the available evidence, it seems clear that Donohue and Wolfers provide the strongest article of the four insofar as they exhaustively detail the methodological failures which undermine many studies determined to support the validity of capital punishment (although the aforementioned Dezhbakhsh and Shepherd study seems to scrupulously follow the sort of detailed regression analysis that Donohue and Wolfers accuse many pro-death penalty studies of lacking). On the other hand, the Marquis argument appears to be the weakest for the very simple reason that it eschews quantitative research in favor of a more strident, accusatory tone that fails to appreciate that even a few mistaken executions is too many. On the whole, however, the four articles do appear to be a solid beginning to further research and certainly reveal that the evidence does not offer unanimous support to one side or the other."
| |
|
Immigration Laws, 2007.
This paper explores whether state and local authorities in the US are responsible for enforcing federal immigration laws.
1,268 words (approx. 5.1 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses how immigration has become a highly contentious issue in American politics, due to the fear of terrorism and worry for the nation's economy. The paper discusses how pressure for enforcement has created a domestic constitutional issue that raises the issue of who is responsible for enforcing immigration laws.
From the Paper
"Immigration has become a highly contentious issue in American politics, probably the second most contentious behind abortion in terms of domestic policy. Protection of the borders has become more important to many people since the 9-11 attacks, based on the view that terrorists could cross the borders and wreak havoc. The terrorists involved in the 9-11 attacks entered the country legally and then failed to go home as they were supposed to do, but none simply crossed the borders illegally. Still, the perception grew quickly that protecting the borders was necessary to protect us from terrorism."
| |
|
Stem Cell Research, 2007.
This paper deals with the controversial issue of stem cell research.
1,393 words (approx. 5.6 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 33.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer notes that the issue of stem cell research has to do with a conflict between the need for scientific research on the one hand, and the moral issues associated with the sanctity of human life on the other hand. The writer discusses that taking human life is certainly reprehensible to most people's moral code, but there is also the issue of all the good that could come out of stem cell research, in terms of alleviating human suffering. The writer points out that the issue of funding stem cell research in the U.S.A. remains steeped in controversy and subject to severe restrictions. The writer concludes that if it continues and does one day yield almost miraculous cures, this might have an extremely positive impact on the US economy - but it might also yield even more complex moral issues, as to who gets to reap its benefits, and who does not.
From the Paper
"There is clearly a strong case to be made for this point of view. Harvesting stem cells implies that the embryo is denied the chance of growing into a human being, so it is clearly not to be taken lightly. On the other hand, proponents of stem cell research argue that in normal life, human eggs are frequently fertilized but fail to implant in the woman's uterus. Thus, a fertilized egg should not be seen as a human life, but only as potential human life - without the same rights and privileges of an actual human being. Apart from this theoretical point, proponents of stem cell research point out that in practice, the embryos utilized never had any hope of growing and being born anyway."
| |
|
Guantanamo Bay, 2007.
This paper decries the unlawful and inhumane treatment of detainees in Guantanamo Bay.
1,483 words (approx. 5.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 35.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper contends that the Bush Administration has refused to address the root causes of terrorism and has chosen instead to rely upon military force, detaining and abusing prisoners in Guantanamo. The paper asserts that the Bush Administration's actions contradict their claims of spreading freedom and democracy throughout the world. The paper maintains that as long as these actions are not rectified, terrorism will increase and the world will continue to be destabilized.
From the Paper
"The twentieth century was plagued by fascist militarism, brutal dictatorships, global military confrontation, and regional wars, which were triggered by economic injustice, religious intolerance, countless ideological rivalries, and seething ethnic and racial hatreds. These same factors have produced terrorism in the twenty-first century, for we have not left behind the consequences of twentieth century enmities and conflicts. They continue to incite disaffected groups to unleash terrorist attacks such as 9/11, which in turn incited the Bush Administration to take extreme measures in the hope of preventing
future terrorist attacks."
| |
|
Gay Rights and Civil Rights, 2007.
This paper compares and contrasts gay rights with civil rights.
880 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 1 source, MLA, £ 22.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer discusses whether homosexuals should receive rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. The writer questions whether gays should receive rights compared to civil rights. The writer argues that while it is true that gays and minorities are often mistreated, the difference is in the ability to make a decision. The writer maintains that gay rights are different than civil rights because homosexuals make the decision to be gays and even the Bible shows that it is wrong, but African-Americans are born "black" and the Bill of Rights guarantee rights to "all men". The writer then points out that the Civil Rights Act was passed to guarantee that all African-Americans be treated equally with other Americans. The writer argues that comparing gay rights with civil rights shows that gays make a decision to date or love another person of the same sex, while African-Americans are born with their skin color and they should be given the same rights as any American.
From the Paper
"Before determining whether gays should have rights it is important to look at the definition of homosexuals. The definition of homosexuals will show that it is defined as a sexual orientation with romantic love and sexual desire of the same sex or gender. When a person falls in love with another person, a decision must be made to love the person. Homosexuality is a decision. The gay person decides to fall in love with another person of his or her same gender. This is the same as if a person decides to never date a person or if a person decides to fall in love with another person of a difference sex. Since it is a decision, people should not receive certain rights because they make a decision. Many homosexuals and minorities are rejected jobs and other freedoms so many people believe they should have rights as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. However, it is important to remember that homosexuals decide whether they want to have a love life with a member of the same sex."
| |
|
U.S.A. Immigration, 2007.
This paper discuses past and present U.S.A. immigration laws and the attitudes of citizens towards immigrants
1,235 words (approx. 4.9 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 30.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explains that, although historically on the surface U.S.A. policy has maintained an open door towards immigration, more established immigrant groups and nationalities have discouraged immigration from nations and ethnicities other than their own. The author points out that given the impending health care crisis and the pressure on the educational system, currently, America's immigration laws are under attack for being too lax on both legal aliens and illegal immigrants. The paper relates that the proponents of the latest immigration laws hold to the premise that it is impossible to prevent immigrants from entering the U.S. through legal or illegal means; therefore, legal methods of obtaining citizenship should be proposed even for less favored immigrants.
From the Paper
"Doubtlessly, the United States policy regarding immigration has ceaselessly demanded that foreign peoples conform to our culture, religion, language, and preferably be of our race. The general fear is loss of our way of life; loss of our jobs, degradation of our language, loss of our vast open spaces, weakening of the economy, and loss of our identity. To many people these threats are very real; presently the U.S. takes in almost half of the world's immigrants; this suggests that if there were no regulations, drastic changes would come about."
|
|
|
