| Papers [253-266] of 2753 :: [Page 19 of 197] | | Go to page : <— 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 —> | |
|
|
Globalization Then and Now, 2007.
This paper looks at the beginnings of globalization and discusses globalization in current times.
1,238 words (approx. 5.0 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 29.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer explains that modern globalization is generally understood to be the expansion of businesses and corporate interests to foreign markets either to increase their consumer base or to utilize a cheap workforce. The writer then notes that the history of globalization really dates back to colonial and even ancient time periods; when strategic and monetary aims were first being seen from an intercontinental perspective and were usually achieved to increase the power and wealth of the state. The writer concludes that outside of the political factors that helped to create our economy, technological advances in travel and communications have aided globalization, and at the same time been fostered by it.
From the Paper
"Within the Roman Empire, for example, numerous Germanic clans - most notably the Goths - desperately sought to incorporate themselves into the powerful Roman state because it offered them economic opportunities as well as safety from invading tribes, like the Huns. Additionally, through most of Roman history, incorporating these people into the Empire was beneficial; conquered lands meant more slaves, more citizens meant more soldiers, more lands meant a more food, and all of these meant a more opulent lifestyle was possible for the ruling culture or class. Although ancient globalization centered on military operations, the ultimate goal was quite analogous to present day globalization: increasing the wealth of the expansionists. Modern expansionists, however, achieve their aims with far less bloodshed and no longer need the people they draw their wealth from to be subjugated by their homeland. Accordingly, the primary difference between the form of globalization evident in ancient times and the form prevalent in modern times is the current absence of military enforcement and the limited role of the state."
| |
|
Globalization and Colonialism, 2007.
An analysis of the similarities and differences between colonialism and globalization as they relate to the economy.
1,005 words (approx. 4.0 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 24.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores the concepts of globalization and colonialism as they relate to the economy. The paper defines each term individually and then examines the similarities and differences in the two concepts. It then defines neocolonialism and argues that society continues to live in a neocolonial world. The paper then provides reasons that support this argument.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Colonialism
Globalization
Similarities
Differences
Neocolonialism
From the Paper
"The main similarity between globalization and colonialism is the fact that it is economically driven and nonmilitary by nature (Massey, 2004). The underlying economic power in the globalization process is similar by nature to what happens in a colonialism effort between two geographic areas. In addition the effort to globalize is in some ways dovetailing with the colonialism efforts of history as it provides the weakening of the former financial structuring and places a stronger unified system in its place. While this is an important component of the two systems it is where the similarities end. The differences are much more obvious and evident."
| |
|
Free Trade, 2007.
This paper discusses free trade and looks at the economic benefits of current agreements between the US and its economic partners.
5,132 words (approx. 20.5 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 88.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer points out that while tariffs were once popular in the historical past as a way of protecting the national economy from the forces of competition, today most economists agree that free trade has more benefits for both countries engaging in such trade than drawbacks. The writer notes that the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the Canada-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement, are all treaties that have attempted to curtail or eliminate tariffs between the agreeing nations with the aim of improving international business. These agreements are discussed. The writer concludes that by rendering nations more interdependent upon one another in the developed and developing worlds, persons living in areas of the globe, from Canada to Costa Rica, from Mexico to Israel to the United States, will have a greater interest in maintaining peace and stability between nations of different cultures.
From the Paper
"The United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and the Canada-Costa Rica Free Trade Agreement, are all treaties that have attempted to curtail or eliminate tariffs between the agreeing nations with the aim of improving international business. The US-Israel Free Trade Agreement was the first of its kind, and has since become a model for other free trade agreements. The US-Israel Free Trade Agreement allowed American products to compete with European goods on the Israel domestic market. It was agreed upon between countries in 1985 and eliminated almost all restrictions and duties on trade between the United States and Israel. A non-binding declaration of trade in services was also included in the FTA, providing for the elimination of barriers in industries pertaining to tourism, communications, banking, insurances, management, consulting, accounting, law, computer sciences, and advertising."
| |
|
International Order, 2006.
A look at international or world order.
4,027 words (approx. 16.1 pages), 5 sources, MLA, £ 75.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the concept of international order. According to the paper, the idea of international order or world order is nothing new; however technological innovations have created a world that is increasingly more global. In light of this globalization the type of international order that will emerge is in question. This paper examines the emerging international order to determine if it is increasingly liberal.
Outline:
Introduction
International Order from a Historical Perspective
The Current System of International Order
The Role of an Imperial Threat
Conclusion
From the Paper
"Overall this aspect the research seems to indicate that in the eyes of many America has already formed an imperial structure or way of being as it relates to foreign policy and the international community. Whether this kind of informal imperialism was intentional is unclear. However, it seems more likes that America's dominance in the world is a result of the positions that the United States took following the world war. During much of this time America worked multilaterally with other nations to bring about peace and stability in the world. America was able to influence countries because it had both economic and political strength that was unparallel. Although there were conflicts after the Cold War that involved American troops, America seemed more apt to solve problems using diplomatic means. However, after the attacks of 9/11 the approach to global conflict changed and the nation believed that it had to act unilaterally to ensure the security of its citizens. Because this unilateral approach as it relates specifically to the invasion of Iraq-- has lessened the sovereignty of nation states, America is viewed as a nation that desires imperial rule. "
| |
|
2000 vs. 1960, 2006.
This paper argues that, despite the passage of time, the cause and effect of the world climate in 1960 and today are very similar.
1,820 words (approx. 7.3 pages), 3 sources, APA, £ 40.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper contends that, comparing today with 1960, humanity has not advanced in the past four decades; the world of today still comes down to the choice of opportunity and harmony or discord and destruction. The author explains that, in 1960, because of the Cold War, the world faced the threat of nuclear war; whereas, in the 21st century, with the collapse of the U.S.S.R and the subsequent strengthening of the U.S. and other nations, which has resulted in some of the Islamic peoples' growing resentment towards Western influence, the world now faces global terrorism. This paper concludes that the world community is constantly faced with choices that literally can result in life or death; therefore, every person, government leader and nation must make the right choices between war or peace and freedom or oppression to ensure the life of future generations.
Table of Contents:
Introduction
Definition
Cause and Effect
Argument
Conclusion
From the Paper
"In 1960, on a cold crisp January afternoon, the newly elected President of the United States, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, stood at the podium of his inaugural and gave a speech outlining his objectives for the coming presidential term. As one of the most powerful nations in the world at that time, people in all corners of the globe listened with rapt attention. In this speech, Kennedy made it clear that he represented a new era of leadership not only for the United States, but also for the world; a leadership that was born in the 20th century and held a fresh point of view to lead the nations of the world in a bold new direction, ..."
| |
|
NAFTA, 2006.
A discussion regarding the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
750 words (approx. 3.0 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 18.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper takes a look at the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) from the perspective of right-wing activist, Pat Buchanan and left-wing activist, Ralph Nader. According to the paper, it is rare for Buchanan and Nader to agree on anything, but NAFTA represents an area where these two traditionally opposite ends of the political and economic spectrum have comparable viewpoints.
From the Paper
"Both Buchanan and Nader dispute that NAFTA is facilitating comparative advantage for the benefit of all. According to Nader, "Someday the pollyanna belief that the US economy always replaces the jobs it loses overseas with new jobs here, as we keep racing ahead of other countries with modern technology, may run into a contrary riptide that no set of spurious statistics can obscure." Buchanan elaborates with statistics related to manufacturing jobs. He says that under Bush, three million manufacturing jobs have disappeared, one in every six, and that Mexico is taking on our higher value exports. Mexico's leading exports to the United States in 2005 were automobiles, oil, electrical machinery, computers, furniture, textiles and apparel while the United States' leading exports to Mexico were plastics, chemicals, cereals, cotton, meat, paper, oil seed, aluminum, copper and knitted or crocheted fabrics. Nader, on free trade in general, points out the lost of skilled jobs in the United States in the fields of computer programming, payroll processing, airline passenger billings, and insurance computer applications."
| |
|
Russia, Germany & the UN Security Council, 2006.
An analysis of Russia's foreign policy regarding Germany's demand for a permanent seat in the UN Security Council.
2,144 words (approx. 8.6 pages), 11 sources, MLA, £ 46.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper provides a discussion of the key issues and disputes between Russia and Germany. The paper describes the historical sequence and context of these events, identifies the respective interests and goals of the parties involved and discusses the various policy alternatives under consideration.
Outline:
Introduction
Review and Discussion
Key Issues/Problems/Concerns
Recent and Current Policy.
Respective Goals of Russia and Germany, Their Rationale and Relative Importance
Foreign Policy Alternatives
Conclusion
From the Paper
"German Foreign Policy. In recent years, German foreign policy has always been that the country did not want to have to choose between France and Europe on the one hand and the United States on the other (Sands 6), but the nation has increasingly sought a more active leadership role in regional and global affairs. A speech before the UN General Assembly on September 25, 1996 by the German Foreign Minister Kinkel articulated the evolution of German foreign policy responsibilities. According to Lantis (2002), "Reaffirming Germany's commitment to multilateralism, Kinkel called on the member states of the UN to take decisive action to bolster the organization's effectiveness and efficiency" (133). At that time, the German foreign minister also reported that Germany would support an extension of the mandate for the Implementation Force (IFOR), a NATO-led multinational force in Bosnia and Herzegovina (IFOR 1). "
| |
|
The American Image in Germany, 2006.
A look at the image of America from a German perspective.
1,185 words (approx. 4.7 pages), 4 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the German perspective of the USA. The paper reviews the historical relationship between the two countries and reviews the difference between the diplomatic German opinion with that of the average German citizen.
From the Paper
"In recent years, German-American relations have been considered on the downtrend especially with the negative outlook on America's foreign and military policies on Iraq, Iran and other hot spots. With the new German chancellor, Angela Merkel, showing emerging signs of bridging the gap between U.S.-German relationships - this might be a gesture of interest in rebuilding the Atlantic alliance and see if the "Bush administration wants to see her get the economy moving again so Germany can pick up the slack from the U.S. but also work with the U.S. to deal with challenges such as Russia and Iran (USINFO, 2006)." The assistance or partnership of the U.S. in stabilizing the region without appearing as the "neighborhood bully" might capture the sympathy and support of the German people in terms of accepting fully the U.S. again as a partner in global governance."
| |
|
The US and the Middle East, 2007.
This paper describes the motives influencing US policy in the Middle East.
973 words (approx. 3.9 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 23.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper explores US policy in the Middle East over the last half-century. Several factors that have influenced American diplomatic policy in the region are considered, including the threat of communism and the US reliance on oil. Special consideration is given to the end of the Cold War and its impact on US policy toward Israel and the Arab nations. The paper cites the delicate diplomacy the United States must employ in the region, between appeasing the oil-rich Saudi kingdom, rooting out international terrorism, and maintaining ties with Israel, a democratic ally.
From the Paper
"The Soviet Union's dissolution caused a seismic change in the world geopolitical scene, as it spelled the decline of the bipolar balance of power in the world. However, although it called into question a number of the polices of the United States, it could be argued that the collapse of the Soviet Union, ideologically, had less of an impact upon the Middle East than the rise of Islamic fundamentalism. Communism had never been a formidable force in the Middle East, unlike Latin America. But it is true that in practical terms of foreign aid, the coming to prominence of fundamentalist regimes in the Middle East in Iran was partially enabled by the decline of Soviet influence, cash and power backing up some regimes, as in Afghanistan. Renegade groups and states in their wrangling for power in the region often used old Soviet weapons, now traded on the black market."
| |
|
Israel and Palestine, 2007.
This paper describes the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians in a historical context.
1,441 words (approx. 5.8 pages), 4 sources, APA, £ 32.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper argues that to understand the suggested two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians, one must first understand the origins of the conflict. An overview of the history is presented from the Palestinian viewpoint. Conditions that the Palestinians side deems necessary for a two-state solution are presented in a list format. The author concludes that the greatest impediment to the two-state solution, however, is trust on both sides.
From the Paper
" In essence the various political events in the region over the past century have created two separate and opposing realities or "narratives". The first is the Israeli narrative of the horror of the Holocaust, coupled with claims to the Holy lands which are seen as being ordained by God to the Jewish people. This has resulted in the occupation of Palestine and the violence, demolition of houses etc. More importantly it leads to what is perceived as the denial of Palestinian autonomy and a reduction of a sense of dignity and the very right to their narrative or political history."
| |
|
Global Business Strategies, 2007.
This paper discusses the issue of global business and studies the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).
882 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 3 sources, MLA, £ 21.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
In this article, the writer researches and analyzes the role of regional integration in promoting global business. The writer then discusses the advantages and disadvantages of regional integration. Further, the writer compares and contrasts the economic development stages of countries within one region and the ramifications of the region's economic development for global business. This work focuses on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The writer concludes that the intentions and the reality of NAFTA are radically different.
Outline:
Objective
Introduction
Global Trade and NAFTA
Summary and Conclusion
Bibliography
From the Paper
"It is clear that the promise of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) has not materialized in the lives of independent farmers, wage workers and that this has greatly affected the lives of millions. NAFTA is proclaimed by the governments and corporations within the countries of NAFTA to be an unmitigated success and perhaps from the perspective of the governments and the corporations this is true. The problem that exists is that the independent farmers are out of business and migrating into the areas where jobs are already scarce and wages are low. Furthermore U.S. independent farmers have been essentially driven out of business due to impacts of NAFTA. It should be questioned that the only growers of food are the big corporations leaving little in the way of choice to consumers."
| |
|
The U.S. and the Korean War, 2007.
This paper explores the role of the United States in the current Korean conflict.
864 words (approx. 3.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 20.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper discusses the Korean War that divided a once single nation into North and South Korea. The paper shows how the United States has been one of the raison d'etre for the Korean War; the U.S. saw the Soviet Union's expansion in the Asian continent as a threat to its sphere of democracy. The paper discusses how as the world entered the 21st century, the United States continued its involvement in the Korean peninsula, albeit as a broker for peace and reunification initiatives. The paper concludes that despite all the United States' reunification efforts, the two Koreas are still a long way off from actually coming to terms with reunification.
From the Paper
"Never in the history of mankind have we seen a conflict that lasted for over half a century. A conflict that started with a full-scale warfare and continued with skirmishes and psychological warfare, the Korean War divided a once single nation into North and South Korea. "On June 25, 1950, fighting broke out between North Korea and South Korea along the 38th parallel. The South Koreans were quickly overrun and sought help from the United Nations (UN). By October, UN forces had advanced as far north as the Yalu River, which forms Korea's border with China. China then entered the war on the side of North Korea and forced a retreat of UN troops back toward the 38th parallel. An armistice line was formed July 27, 1953, north of the 38th parallel along the battle line. (Microsoft Corp., 2006)" "
| |
|
Korean Reunification, 2007.
This paper explores the Korean Conflict and the possible outcomes of a reunification.
1,131 words (approx. 4.5 pages), 6 sources, MLA, £ 27.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
The paper relates that the Korean War or Conflict is considered nowadays as the longest war fought in modern history. The paper explains that this event in history got its "title" because, from the 1950s up to the present times, Korea has been divided into North and South Korea and the war never officially ended because no truce was ever signed. In considering the possible or probable reunification of Korea, the paper looks at what occurred during the German reunification. The paper predicts that the burden on the economy would be massive and several social conflicts would arise as a result.
From the Paper
"Eventually there was still no firm reunification agreement considering there were still several issues that hamper the peace and reunification process. "The two leaders did not come to any agreement on two other major issues: the presence of nearly 40,000 U.S. troops in South Korea and North Korea's long-range and nuclear missile programs. (CNN News, 2000)" Despite all the hypes and contacts between the two Koreas and its leaders, the issues remained unresolved and the plan is still a long way off."
| |
|
US and Germany, 2006.
A review of the relationship between the USA and Germany.
1,078 words (approx. 4.3 pages), 7 sources, MLA, £ 25.95
»
Click here to show/hide summary
Abstract
This paper discusses the impact that German politics have on the USA. The paper reviews the history of Germany, the relationship between the USA and Germany and the effect German politics have had on the USA, economically and politically. The paper focuses primarily on the unification of East and West Germany.
From the Paper
"The Socialist Unity Party (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands), headed by Ulbrecht for decades, laid the foundations for the state-controlled industrial economy that would characterize East Germany and which might have crippled the Eastern provinces' potential to thrive as part of the EU. Like the former GDR, West Germany also emphasized heavy industry during the Cold War as a key to their economic growth, but the FRG permitted at least some form of free enterprise and also enjoyed having the United States as a wealthy trading partner."
|
|
|
