Login Create Account
 
Power Your Document

The GCHQ Case and Judicial Reviews


# 109251
The GCHQ Case and Judicial Reviews
An examination of the "Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for Civil Service" (or GCHQ) case and its relevance to judicial reviews.
2,873 words (approx. 11.5 pages) | 6 sources | APA | 2004 United Kingdom


Paper Summary:

This paper questions whether the "Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for Civil Service" (or GCHQ) case still has a great deal to teach us about judicial review. It examines the existing grounds of judicial review with respect to the GCHQ case, namely, illegality, irrationality and procedural impropriety. The paper shows that they are extremely developed and that they contribute to making the process of judicial review more accessible.

From the Paper:

"By illegality, he meant that 'the decision-maker must understand correctly the law that regulates his decision-making power and must give effect to it.' The courts may intervene and rule an action or a decision illegal if it is "ultra vires" i.e. the public body or officer performing it had no power to take such action or they exceeded their power. Moreover, an exercise of power which runs counter to the policy and objectives of the empowering Act or defeats the purpose for which power was given is also deemed to be illegal. There are various principles which fall under this head: (a) Relevant/Irrelevant Considerations, (b) Fiduciary Duty, (c) Fettering of Discretion, (d) Improper Purpose, and (e) Bad Faith. In reality, this definition sheds little light on these principles under its head. We will briefly cover these principles below."

Sample of Sources Used:

  • A W Bradley and K D Ewing, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 13th Ed. 2003, Pearson Education Limited
  • Leyland, P. and Woods, T. Textbook on Administrative Law, 4th Ed. 2002, Oxford: OUP
  • Walker, P 'What's Wrong with Irrationality?' [1995] Public Law 556
  • Craig, P. P. Administrative Law, 5th Ed. 2003, Sweet and Maxwell
  • Craig, P. P. 'Legitimate Expectations: A Conceptual Analysis' [1992] 107 Law Quarterly Review 79

Cite this paper

APA Citation:

The GCHQ Case and Judicial Reviews (2012, January 15). Retrieved February 13, 2012, from http://www.academon.co.uk/Research-Paper-The-GCHQ-Case-and-Judicial-Reviews/109251

MLA Citation:

"The GCHQ Case and Judicial Reviews" 15 January 2012. Web. 13 Feb. 2012. <http://www.academon.co.uk/Research-Paper-The-GCHQ-Case-and-Judicial-Reviews/109251>




ATTENTION:

Your browser does not have cookies enabled.

Our shopping cart will not function properly.
Downloadable version: £ 32.95
ADD TO CART »
You will be able to download, read and edit this file once you buy this document
Shopping Cart
Currency:
AcaDemon.com is that one place
Published by:

davyd GB
Publisher Since:
May 18, 2006
The School of Law at King's College London has been awarded the highest research and teaching ratings by the UK Government's Higher Education Funding Council. It enjoys a distinguished international reputation.
Seller Assistance
Share Our Success