Descent and Alliance Theory

Paper Summary:

This paper examines descent theory and alliance theory and some of the ethnographies associated with them in an attempt to discover why these formulations are not considered satisfactory analytical tools today. It then turns to modern developments in kinship to try to analyse the common points of failure for both theories. It takes the view that the two theories in question were very much a product of an attempt to reproduce a conception of existing in the world that is the product of a European elite.

From the Paper:

"Descent theory became popular in the 50's, and was used as an analytic tool to explain everything from divorce rates to witchcraft accusations. In this application to everything, the first cracks in theory began to emerge. In Papua New Guinea, where descent theory seemed to be an almost perfect fit, John Barnes notes that it did not explain why the foundations of community organisation included a large number of non-agnates who were powerful figures in the community. Behaviour is descent theory, as evidenced by these examples, is simply not realistic. Social systems allow room for manoeuvre and manipulation."

More papers on Descent and Alliance Theory:

• Analytical Essay # 138729 : "Functionalism and Conflict Theory"
• Term Paper # 127822 : "Patricia Benner and Nursing Theory"
• Research Paper # 51936 : "The Definition of Marriage"

APA Citation:

MLA Citation: